Genomic Markers Distinguishing Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli: Insights from Pangenome and Phylogenomic Analyses.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Asmaa Elrefaey, Kingsley E Bentum, Emmanuel Kuufire, Tyric James, Rejoice Nyarku, Viona Osei, Yilkal Woube, Temesgen Samuel, Woubit Abebe
{"title":"Genomic Markers Distinguishing Shiga Toxin-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i>: Insights from Pangenome and Phylogenomic Analyses.","authors":"Asmaa Elrefaey, Kingsley E Bentum, Emmanuel Kuufire, Tyric James, Rejoice Nyarku, Viona Osei, Yilkal Woube, Temesgen Samuel, Woubit Abebe","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14090862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) are genetically diverse foodborne pathogens of major global public health concerns. Serogroup-level identification is critical for effective surveillance and outbreak control; however, it is often challenged by STEC's genome plasticity and frequent recombination. In this study, we employed a standardized pangenomic pipeline integrating Roary ILP Bacterial Core Annotation Pipeline (RIBAP) and Panaroo to analyze 160 complete, high-quality STEC genomes representing eight major serogroups at a 95% sequence identity threshold. Candidate serogroup-specific markers were identified using gene presence/absence profiles from RIBAP and Panaroo. Our analysis revealed several high-confidence markers, including metabolic genes (<i>dgcE</i>, <i>fcl_</i>2, <i>dmsA</i>, <i>hisC</i>) and surface polysaccharide-related genes (<i>capD</i>, <i>rfbX</i>, <i>wzzB</i>). Comparative pangenomic evaluation showed that RIBAP predicted a larger pangenome size than Panaroo. Additionally, some genomes from the O104:H1, O145:H28, and O45:H2 serotypes clustered outside their expected clades, indicating sporadic serotype misplacements in phylogenetic reconstructions. Functional annotation suggested that most candidate markers are involved in critical processes such as glucose metabolism, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and cell surface assembly. Notably, approximately 22.9% of the identified proteins were annotated as hypothetical. Overall, this study highlights the utility of pangenomic analysis for potential identification of clinically relevant STEC serogroups markers and phylogenetic interpretation. We also note that pangenome analysis could guide the development of more accurate diagnostic and surveillance tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are genetically diverse foodborne pathogens of major global public health concerns. Serogroup-level identification is critical for effective surveillance and outbreak control; however, it is often challenged by STEC's genome plasticity and frequent recombination. In this study, we employed a standardized pangenomic pipeline integrating Roary ILP Bacterial Core Annotation Pipeline (RIBAP) and Panaroo to analyze 160 complete, high-quality STEC genomes representing eight major serogroups at a 95% sequence identity threshold. Candidate serogroup-specific markers were identified using gene presence/absence profiles from RIBAP and Panaroo. Our analysis revealed several high-confidence markers, including metabolic genes (dgcE, fcl_2, dmsA, hisC) and surface polysaccharide-related genes (capD, rfbX, wzzB). Comparative pangenomic evaluation showed that RIBAP predicted a larger pangenome size than Panaroo. Additionally, some genomes from the O104:H1, O145:H28, and O45:H2 serotypes clustered outside their expected clades, indicating sporadic serotype misplacements in phylogenetic reconstructions. Functional annotation suggested that most candidate markers are involved in critical processes such as glucose metabolism, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and cell surface assembly. Notably, approximately 22.9% of the identified proteins were annotated as hypothetical. Overall, this study highlights the utility of pangenomic analysis for potential identification of clinically relevant STEC serogroups markers and phylogenetic interpretation. We also note that pangenome analysis could guide the development of more accurate diagnostic and surveillance tools.

区分产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的基因组标记:来自泛基因组和系统基因组分析的见解。
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)是遗传多样性的食源性病原体,是全球主要公共卫生问题。血清组水平的鉴定对有效监测和疫情控制至关重要;然而,它经常受到产肠毒素大肠杆菌基因组可塑性和频繁重组的挑战。在这项研究中,我们采用了标准化的全基因组管道,整合了Roary ILP细菌核心注释管道(RIBAP)和Panaroo,以95%的序列识别阈值分析了160个完整的、高质量的STEC基因组,代表了8个主要的血清群。利用RIBAP和Panaroo的基因存在/缺失谱确定候选血清组特异性标记。我们的分析发现了几个高可信度的标记,包括代谢基因(dgcE, fcl_2, dmsA, hisC)和表面多糖相关基因(capD, rfbX, wzzB)。比较全基因组评估显示,RIBAP预测的全基因组大小比Panaroo大。此外,来自O104:H1、O145:H28和O45:H2血清型的一些基因组聚集在其预期分支之外,表明在系统发育重建中存在零星的血清型错位。功能注释表明,大多数候选标记都参与了葡萄糖代谢、脂多糖生物合成和细胞表面组装等关键过程。值得注意的是,大约22.9%的鉴定蛋白被标注为假设蛋白。总的来说,本研究强调了全基因组分析在临床相关产志异大肠杆菌血清群标记物鉴定和系统发育解释方面的效用。我们还注意到,泛基因组分析可以指导开发更准确的诊断和监测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信