{"title":"Formulation of Recombinant Therapeutic Proteins: Technological Innovation, Regulations, and Evolution Towards Buffer-Free Formulations.","authors":"Tomas Gabriel Bas","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17091183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Formulating recombinant therapeutic proteins is essential to ensure their safety, efficacy, and stability. A growing trend in biopharmaceutical development is the move toward buffer-free formulations, which aim to reduce immunogenicity, improve tolerability, and simplify production. This review explores technological advances, regulatory perspectives, and safety considerations related to this shift. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic documentary review was conducted using the PSALSAR framework. Scientific publications, patents, and regulatory documents (2020-2025) were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and regulatory databases (FDA, EMA). Inclusion criteria focused on recombinant proteins, buffer-free formulations, and regulatory alignment. <b>Results</b>: The findings reveal an increasing adoption of self-buffering strategies in high-concentration subcutaneous biologics. Technologies such as Fc-fusion, PASylation, and XTENylation enhance stability without conventional buffers. Regulatory bodies are progressively accepting minimalist formulations, provided safety and biosimilarity are demonstrated. However, intellectual property barriers limit formulation transparency. A synthesis of recent FDA and EMA approvals illustrates this formulation evolution. <b>Conclusions</b>: Buffer-free formulations offer a promising alternative for therapeutic protein development by improving patient experience and reducing formulation complexity. They align with biosimilar goals and regulatory trends, although long-term transparency and safety assessments remain critical for widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Formulating recombinant therapeutic proteins is essential to ensure their safety, efficacy, and stability. A growing trend in biopharmaceutical development is the move toward buffer-free formulations, which aim to reduce immunogenicity, improve tolerability, and simplify production. This review explores technological advances, regulatory perspectives, and safety considerations related to this shift. Methods: A systematic documentary review was conducted using the PSALSAR framework. Scientific publications, patents, and regulatory documents (2020-2025) were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and regulatory databases (FDA, EMA). Inclusion criteria focused on recombinant proteins, buffer-free formulations, and regulatory alignment. Results: The findings reveal an increasing adoption of self-buffering strategies in high-concentration subcutaneous biologics. Technologies such as Fc-fusion, PASylation, and XTENylation enhance stability without conventional buffers. Regulatory bodies are progressively accepting minimalist formulations, provided safety and biosimilarity are demonstrated. However, intellectual property barriers limit formulation transparency. A synthesis of recent FDA and EMA approvals illustrates this formulation evolution. Conclusions: Buffer-free formulations offer a promising alternative for therapeutic protein development by improving patient experience and reducing formulation complexity. They align with biosimilar goals and regulatory trends, although long-term transparency and safety assessments remain critical for widespread adoption.
背景/目的:制备重组治疗蛋白是确保其安全性、有效性和稳定性的必要条件。生物制药发展的一个日益增长的趋势是转向无缓冲制剂,其目的是降低免疫原性,提高耐受性,并简化生产。这篇综述探讨了与这种转变相关的技术进步、监管观点和安全考虑。方法:采用pssar框架进行系统的文献综述。从PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和监管数据库(FDA、EMA)检索科学出版物、专利和监管文件(2020-2025)。纳入标准集中在重组蛋白,无缓冲配方和调节对齐。结果:研究结果表明,在高浓度皮下生物制剂中越来越多地采用自缓冲策略。fc融合、pas酰化和xten酰化等技术提高了稳定性,无需常规缓冲液。监管机构正在逐步接受极简配方,前提是安全性和生物相似性得到证明。然而,知识产权壁垒限制了配方的透明度。最近FDA和EMA批准的综合说明了这种配方的演变。结论:无缓冲剂配方通过改善患者体验和降低配方复杂性,为治疗性蛋白质开发提供了一个有希望的替代方案。它们与生物仿制药目标和监管趋势一致,尽管长期透明度和安全性评估对于广泛采用仍然至关重要。
PharmaceuticsPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍:
Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.