Fracture Toughness, Work of Fracture and Hardness of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins.

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.3390/ma18184338
Sebastian Hetzler, Sebastian Rehm, Sven Räther, Stefan Rues, Andreas Zenthöfer, Peter Rammelsberg, Franz Sebastian Schwindling
{"title":"Fracture Toughness, Work of Fracture and Hardness of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins.","authors":"Sebastian Hetzler, Sebastian Rehm, Sven Räther, Stefan Rues, Andreas Zenthöfer, Peter Rammelsberg, Franz Sebastian Schwindling","doi":"10.3390/ma18184338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To compare fracture toughness (FT), work of fracture (WOF) and Vickers hardness (HV) of four 3D-printed denture base resins-including two novel formulations-and one conventional cold-cured polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) resin. <b>Methods:</b> 3D-printed specimens (Freeprint denture (FD)/denture impact (FDI), DETAX GmbH and V-Print dentbase/dentbase 2.0, VOCO GmbH) were fabricated at 90° layer orientation (<i>n</i> = 40/group) and notched according to ISO 20795-1. FT and WOF were measured via single-edge notched bend testing after seven-day water storage at 37 °C. HV was determined on fractured shards using 3 N load. Data were analyzed with Welch-ANOVA/Dunnett-T3 or ANOVA/Tukey (α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> The conventional PMMA showed the highest FT and WOF, followed by the novel formulations of the 3D-printed groups VD2 and FDI. Lowest FT and WOF values were measured for VD and FD. HV was highest for the conventional PMMA, followed by the primary formulations FD and VD. Lowest hardness was measured for the novel formulations FDI and VD2. <b>Conclusions:</b> The formulations of the novel 3D-printed materials (FDI and VD2) exhibited markedly greater FT and WOF than their respective predecessors, although this improvement was accompanied by a decrease in hardness. Nevertheless, none of the 3D-printed materials fulfilled the ISO standard criteria for enhanced FT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare fracture toughness (FT), work of fracture (WOF) and Vickers hardness (HV) of four 3D-printed denture base resins-including two novel formulations-and one conventional cold-cured polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) resin. Methods: 3D-printed specimens (Freeprint denture (FD)/denture impact (FDI), DETAX GmbH and V-Print dentbase/dentbase 2.0, VOCO GmbH) were fabricated at 90° layer orientation (n = 40/group) and notched according to ISO 20795-1. FT and WOF were measured via single-edge notched bend testing after seven-day water storage at 37 °C. HV was determined on fractured shards using 3 N load. Data were analyzed with Welch-ANOVA/Dunnett-T3 or ANOVA/Tukey (α = 0.05). Results: The conventional PMMA showed the highest FT and WOF, followed by the novel formulations of the 3D-printed groups VD2 and FDI. Lowest FT and WOF values were measured for VD and FD. HV was highest for the conventional PMMA, followed by the primary formulations FD and VD. Lowest hardness was measured for the novel formulations FDI and VD2. Conclusions: The formulations of the novel 3D-printed materials (FDI and VD2) exhibited markedly greater FT and WOF than their respective predecessors, although this improvement was accompanied by a decrease in hardness. Nevertheless, none of the 3D-printed materials fulfilled the ISO standard criteria for enhanced FT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

3d打印义齿基托树脂的断裂韧性、断裂功和硬度。
目的:比较四种3d打印义齿基托树脂的断裂韧性(FT)、断裂功(WOF)和维氏硬度(HV),包括两种新型配方和一种传统冷固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)树脂。方法:3d打印标本(Freeprint义齿(FD)/义齿冲击(FDI), DETAX GmbH和V-Print基托/基托2.0,VOCO GmbH)按90°层取向制作(n = 40/组),并按照ISO 20795-1进行切口。在37°C水储存7天后,通过单边缺口弯曲测试测量FT和WOF。用3n载荷测定破碎碎片的HV。数据采用Welch-ANOVA/Dunnett-T3或ANOVA/Tukey分析(α = 0.05)。结果:传统PMMA的FT和WOF最高,其次是新型配方的3d打印组VD2和FDI。VD和FD组测量最低FT和WOF值。常规PMMA的HV最高,其次是FD和VD。测定了新配方FDI和VD2的最低硬度。结论:新型3d打印材料(FDI和VD2)的配方比各自的前辈表现出明显更高的FT和WOF,尽管这种改进伴随着硬度的降低。然而,没有一种3d打印材料符合ISO标准的增强FT标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信