{"title":"<i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> Phylotyping and Antibiotic Resistance to Six Antibiotics: A Bulgarian Study.","authors":"Lyudmila Boyanova, Georgi Dimitrov, Vessela Raykova, Kircho Patrikov, Raina Gergova, Rumyana Markovska","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13092185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> subspecies/phylotypes can cause infections requiring antibiotic therapy. Phylotyping of 73 (55 acneic and 18 non-acneic) <i>C. acnes</i> strains was performed, and antibiotic susceptibility was tested by E tests, breakpoint susceptibility test, or disk diffusion method. The dominant phylotype in both acneic and non-acneic strains was IA1 (56.2%). Phylotype II was >3-fold more frequent in non-acneic than acneic isolates. Resistance in acneic strains was >41% for clindamycin, 36.4% for tetracycline and 15.9% for levofloxacin, and that in non-acneic strains was >38% for clindamycin, 22.2% for tetracycline and 5.6% for levofloxacin. No strain was piperacillin/tazobactam or vancomycin resistant. Amoxicillin resistance was found in both acneic (5.4%) and non-acneic strains (11.1%), and was rare (1.8%) in phylotype I but higher (23.5%) in other strains. Double resistance was found in 32.6% of acneic and 22.2% of the non-acneic strains, and 9.3% of acneic strains displayed multidrug resistance. In conclusion, IA1 phylotype was dominant in both acneic and non-acneic strains, and type II was more frequent in non-acneic isolates. The detection (at >6%) of amoxicillin resistance represents a rare yet important finding. The presence of double/multidrug resistance strongly implies the need of susceptibility-guided therapy of the associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cutibacterium acnes subspecies/phylotypes can cause infections requiring antibiotic therapy. Phylotyping of 73 (55 acneic and 18 non-acneic) C. acnes strains was performed, and antibiotic susceptibility was tested by E tests, breakpoint susceptibility test, or disk diffusion method. The dominant phylotype in both acneic and non-acneic strains was IA1 (56.2%). Phylotype II was >3-fold more frequent in non-acneic than acneic isolates. Resistance in acneic strains was >41% for clindamycin, 36.4% for tetracycline and 15.9% for levofloxacin, and that in non-acneic strains was >38% for clindamycin, 22.2% for tetracycline and 5.6% for levofloxacin. No strain was piperacillin/tazobactam or vancomycin resistant. Amoxicillin resistance was found in both acneic (5.4%) and non-acneic strains (11.1%), and was rare (1.8%) in phylotype I but higher (23.5%) in other strains. Double resistance was found in 32.6% of acneic and 22.2% of the non-acneic strains, and 9.3% of acneic strains displayed multidrug resistance. In conclusion, IA1 phylotype was dominant in both acneic and non-acneic strains, and type II was more frequent in non-acneic isolates. The detection (at >6%) of amoxicillin resistance represents a rare yet important finding. The presence of double/multidrug resistance strongly implies the need of susceptibility-guided therapy of the associated infections.
期刊介绍:
Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.