{"title":"Retrospective analysis of the use of orthopedic reduction robots in treating low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in the elderly.","authors":"Zhe Lu, Hou Xiuxiu, Baorui Xing","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Rossum Robot in assisting full-process closed reduction and internal fixation for low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 37 patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures due to low-energy trauma, who underwent robotic reduction and internal fixation surgery between October 2023 and May 2024. Eighteen patients underwent Rossum Robot-assisted full-process closed reduction and internal fixation (RoRobot group), while 19 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation with TiRobot assistance (TiRobot group). We compared the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (EGR), the accuracy of screw placement (ASP), and the degree of fracture healing between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Majeed score at preoperative, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical correlations were assessed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The EGR in the RoRobot assistance group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.019). No significant difference was observed in fracture healing between the two groups post-surgery (P = 0.157). No significant difference was found in ASP between the RoRobot and TiRobot assistant groups (P = 0.619). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative VAS and Majeed scores between the two groups (P = 0.611, P = 0.939). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores post-surgery. One week and one month after surgery, the VAS score in the RoRobot assisted group was significantly lower than in the TiRobot assisted group (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). Majeed scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery, and during multiple follow-ups within six months, the RoRobot assisted group showed significantly higher Majeed scores than the TiRobot assisted group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures resulting from low-energy injuries, Rossum robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction and internal fixation surgery leads to less tissue damage, more effective fracture reduction, better postoperative pain relief, and faster recovery compared to TiRobot-assisted internal fixation surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Rossum Robot in assisting full-process closed reduction and internal fixation for low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in elderly patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 37 patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures due to low-energy trauma, who underwent robotic reduction and internal fixation surgery between October 2023 and May 2024. Eighteen patients underwent Rossum Robot-assisted full-process closed reduction and internal fixation (RoRobot group), while 19 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation with TiRobot assistance (TiRobot group). We compared the excellent and good rate of fracture reduction (EGR), the accuracy of screw placement (ASP), and the degree of fracture healing between the two groups. Efficacy indicators included changes in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Majeed score at preoperative, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical correlations were assessed using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and non-parametric tests.
Result: The EGR in the RoRobot assistance group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.019). No significant difference was observed in fracture healing between the two groups post-surgery (P = 0.157). No significant difference was found in ASP between the RoRobot and TiRobot assistant groups (P = 0.619). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative VAS and Majeed scores between the two groups (P = 0.611, P = 0.939). Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores post-surgery. One week and one month after surgery, the VAS score in the RoRobot assisted group was significantly lower than in the TiRobot assisted group (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). Majeed scores significantly increased in both groups post-surgery, and during multiple follow-ups within six months, the RoRobot assisted group showed significantly higher Majeed scores than the TiRobot assisted group.
Conclusion: In elderly patients with osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures resulting from low-energy injuries, Rossum robot-assisted pelvic fracture closed reduction and internal fixation surgery leads to less tissue damage, more effective fracture reduction, better postoperative pain relief, and faster recovery compared to TiRobot-assisted internal fixation surgery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.