Complication profile and risk patterns following elective implant removal in pediatric fractures: a 10-year retrospective analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Taner Alıç, Seniye Burcu Torumtay Alıç, Soner Gürel, Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Murat Çalbiyik
{"title":"Complication profile and risk patterns following elective implant removal in pediatric fractures: a 10-year retrospective analysis.","authors":"Taner Alıç, Seniye Burcu Torumtay Alıç, Soner Gürel, Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Murat Çalbiyik","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06264-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal timing and necessity of implant removal (IR) following fracture healing in children. Although generally recommended between 1 and 12 months after osteosynthesis, IR carries risks such as refracture, infection, and neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate the indications for IR, the timing of removal, and the complications observed during and after implant extraction in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 115 pediatric patients (mean age: 10.8 years, range: 2-17) who underwent IR following fracture treatment. Data on implant retention duration, type of implant, indication for removal, and post-removal complications were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IR was most commonly performed in asymptomatic cases upon parental request (90.4%), particularly for forearm fractures. Titanium elastic nails and plate-screw systems were the most frequently removed implants. Post-removal complications included refracture (4.3%), infection (1.7%), incomplete removal (1.7%), radial nerve neuropraxia (0.9%), and wound problems (0.9%). Refractures occurred within 5 to 18 days postoperatively, with the forearm being the most frequently affected region (7.5% of forearm IR cases). No statistically significant association was found between implant type, retention duration, and the occurrence of refracture (p > 0.05). These findings underscore the importance of patient-specific planning and postoperative protective strategies, especially for forearm IR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant removal in pediatric patients is generally safe; however, the risk of early refracture, especially in the forearm, highlights the need for short-term activity restrictions and splint immobilization post-removal. Surgeons should clearly communicate the risks and timing of IR with families during the decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06264-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal timing and necessity of implant removal (IR) following fracture healing in children. Although generally recommended between 1 and 12 months after osteosynthesis, IR carries risks such as refracture, infection, and neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate the indications for IR, the timing of removal, and the complications observed during and after implant extraction in pediatric patients.

Methods: This retrospective study included 115 pediatric patients (mean age: 10.8 years, range: 2-17) who underwent IR following fracture treatment. Data on implant retention duration, type of implant, indication for removal, and post-removal complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results: IR was most commonly performed in asymptomatic cases upon parental request (90.4%), particularly for forearm fractures. Titanium elastic nails and plate-screw systems were the most frequently removed implants. Post-removal complications included refracture (4.3%), infection (1.7%), incomplete removal (1.7%), radial nerve neuropraxia (0.9%), and wound problems (0.9%). Refractures occurred within 5 to 18 days postoperatively, with the forearm being the most frequently affected region (7.5% of forearm IR cases). No statistically significant association was found between implant type, retention duration, and the occurrence of refracture (p > 0.05). These findings underscore the importance of patient-specific planning and postoperative protective strategies, especially for forearm IR.

Conclusion: Implant removal in pediatric patients is generally safe; however, the risk of early refracture, especially in the forearm, highlights the need for short-term activity restrictions and splint immobilization post-removal. Surgeons should clearly communicate the risks and timing of IR with families during the decision-making process.

儿童骨折择期植入物取出后的并发症概况和风险模式:10年回顾性分析。
背景:关于儿童骨折愈合后植入物取出(IR)的最佳时机和必要性,目前还没有明确的共识。虽然通常建议在骨融合术后1 - 12个月进行IR,但IR有再骨折、感染和神经血管损伤等风险。本研究旨在评估儿科患者种植体拔除期间和之后的IR适应证、拔除时机和并发症。方法:本回顾性研究包括115例儿童患者(平均年龄:10.8岁,范围:2-17岁)在骨折治疗后接受IR治疗。记录并分析种植体保留时间、种植体类型、拔除指征和拔除后并发症的数据。结果:IR最常见于无症状患者(90.4%),尤其是前臂骨折患者。钛弹性钉和钢板螺钉系统是最常被移除的植入物。术后并发症包括再骨折(4.3%)、感染(1.7%)、取出不全(1.7%)、桡神经失用(0.9%)和伤口问题(0.9%)。复发发生在术后5 ~ 18天,前臂是最常见的受累部位(占前臂IR病例的7.5%)。种植体类型、固定时间与再骨折发生率无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。这些发现强调了患者特异性计划和术后保护策略的重要性,特别是前臂IR。结论:小儿种植体拔除术总体上是安全的;然而,早期再骨折的风险,特别是在前臂,强调了短期活动限制和夹板固定的必要性。在决策过程中,外科医生应与家属明确沟通IR的风险和时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信