Effect of the Second-generation Motion Correction Algorithm on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Fuminari Tatsugami, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Chikako Fujioka, Toshiro Kitagawa, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"Effect of the Second-generation Motion Correction Algorithm on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.","authors":"Fuminari Tatsugami, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Chikako Fujioka, Toshiro Kitagawa, Kazuo Awai","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The second-generation motion correction algorithm, Snapshot Freeze 2.0 (SSF2), is designed to suppress coronary artery motion in cardiac CT angiography. This study aimed to evaluate whether SSF2 improves unenhanced CT images and to compare the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) values reconstructed with and without SSF2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred nineteen patients with coronary artery calcium (CACS >0) were enrolled in this study. Unenhanced CT for CACS was performed with a phase window limited to 75% of the R-R interval, using 120 kVp and automatic tube current modulation. CACS values were measured on images with and without SSF2, and absolute differences were calculated. Two radiologists assessed the overall image quality, focusing on coronary artery motion, using a 4-point scale (1=uninterpretable, 4=no motion artifacts).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute differences in CACS for patients with heart rates of 60-95 bpm (n=85) were larger than those with heart rates of up to 59 bpm (n=21) or above 95 bpm (n=13) (median: 10.6, range: 0.1 to 171.2; median: 9.3, range: 0.8 to 31.8; median: 6.0, range: 1.6 to 43.4, respectively). In patients with heart rates of 60 to 95 bpm, SSF2 improved image quality scores (P<0.001); however, for heart rates of up to 59 bpm or above 95 bpm, the improvements were not significant (P=0.18 and 0.10, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSF2 reduces motion artifacts in the coronary arteries on unenhanced CT and significantly alters the CACS values. A more accurate calcification assessment is anticipated with SSF2, especially in patients with heart rates of 60 to 95 bpm.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The second-generation motion correction algorithm, Snapshot Freeze 2.0 (SSF2), is designed to suppress coronary artery motion in cardiac CT angiography. This study aimed to evaluate whether SSF2 improves unenhanced CT images and to compare the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) values reconstructed with and without SSF2.

Methods: One hundred nineteen patients with coronary artery calcium (CACS >0) were enrolled in this study. Unenhanced CT for CACS was performed with a phase window limited to 75% of the R-R interval, using 120 kVp and automatic tube current modulation. CACS values were measured on images with and without SSF2, and absolute differences were calculated. Two radiologists assessed the overall image quality, focusing on coronary artery motion, using a 4-point scale (1=uninterpretable, 4=no motion artifacts).

Results: The absolute differences in CACS for patients with heart rates of 60-95 bpm (n=85) were larger than those with heart rates of up to 59 bpm (n=21) or above 95 bpm (n=13) (median: 10.6, range: 0.1 to 171.2; median: 9.3, range: 0.8 to 31.8; median: 6.0, range: 1.6 to 43.4, respectively). In patients with heart rates of 60 to 95 bpm, SSF2 improved image quality scores (P<0.001); however, for heart rates of up to 59 bpm or above 95 bpm, the improvements were not significant (P=0.18 and 0.10, respectively).

Conclusions: SSF2 reduces motion artifacts in the coronary arteries on unenhanced CT and significantly alters the CACS values. A more accurate calcification assessment is anticipated with SSF2, especially in patients with heart rates of 60 to 95 bpm.

第二代运动校正算法对冠状动脉钙化评分的影响。
目的:设计第二代运动校正算法Snapshot Freeze 2.0 (SSF2)来抑制心脏CT血管造影中冠状动脉的运动。本研究旨在评估SSF2是否能改善非增强CT图像,并比较使用和不使用SSF2重建的冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)值。方法:119例冠状动脉钙化(CACS)患者入组研究。对CACS进行无增强CT,相位窗限制为R-R间隔的75%,使用120 kVp和自动管电流调制。测量有无SSF2图像的CACS值,计算绝对差值。两名放射科医生评估了整体图像质量,重点关注冠状动脉运动,使用4分制(1=不可解释,4=无运动伪影)。结果:心率60-95 bpm (n=85)患者的CACS绝对差异大于心率高达59 bpm (n=21)或高于95 bpm (n=13)的患者(中位数:10.6,范围:0.1 ~ 171.2;中位数:9.3,范围:0.8 ~ 31.8;中位数:6.0,范围:1.6 ~ 43.4)。在心率为60 - 95 bpm的患者中,SSF2改善了图像质量评分(pp结论:SSF2减少了未增强CT上冠状动脉的运动伪影,并显著改变了CACS值。SSF2可用于更准确的钙化评估,特别是在心率为60 - 95 bpm的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信