{"title":"Prediction of incident heart failure and/or re-hospitalization using different risk predictor models in Indian patients.","authors":"Anupam Kumar, Aditya Kapoor, S Harikrishnan, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Arshad Nazir, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Accurate prediction of incident heart failure (HF), risk of recurrent HF or hospitalization are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Seeing the rising trends of HF in Indians, the present study assessed the applicability of 5 different HF risk scores in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of the 280 patients recruited, 159 (55.7 %) had HF Stage A, B while 121 (44.3 %) had asymptomatic or symptomatic HF (HF Stage C, D). At 30 ± 7.5 months, new onset HF occurred in 32.07 % and in Stage C/D HF patients, rehospitalization was noted in 37.1 % and 8.9 % died. The incidence of new-onset HF increased incrementally with higher Health ABC scores (13.7, 31.4 and 52.9 % in score 5-10 %, 10-20 %, >20 % respectively). Amongst diabetic patients, TRS-HFDM score strongly predicted new-onset HF (16.7, 30 and 43.3 % in score 1,2 and ≥ 3 respectively). LACE index also accurately predicted events in those with Stage C/D HF: rehospitalization for recurrent HF was 6.6, 44.5 and 48.9 % while mortality was 4, 36 and 60 % in those with LACE index 0-4, 5-9, >9 respectively. Patients without any events had a lower MAGGIC score (19.25 ± 9.56) vs those who died (29.33 ± 8.32). H2FPEF score also performed well: re-hospitalization for HF was 22.2 vs 57.7 % and mortality was 20 vs 72 % in score <2 vs score >2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These easily available risk scores can accurately predict events in Indian patients with HF and should be part of clinical workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Accurate prediction of incident heart failure (HF), risk of recurrent HF or hospitalization are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Seeing the rising trends of HF in Indians, the present study assessed the applicability of 5 different HF risk scores in these patients.
Methods and results: Of the 280 patients recruited, 159 (55.7 %) had HF Stage A, B while 121 (44.3 %) had asymptomatic or symptomatic HF (HF Stage C, D). At 30 ± 7.5 months, new onset HF occurred in 32.07 % and in Stage C/D HF patients, rehospitalization was noted in 37.1 % and 8.9 % died. The incidence of new-onset HF increased incrementally with higher Health ABC scores (13.7, 31.4 and 52.9 % in score 5-10 %, 10-20 %, >20 % respectively). Amongst diabetic patients, TRS-HFDM score strongly predicted new-onset HF (16.7, 30 and 43.3 % in score 1,2 and ≥ 3 respectively). LACE index also accurately predicted events in those with Stage C/D HF: rehospitalization for recurrent HF was 6.6, 44.5 and 48.9 % while mortality was 4, 36 and 60 % in those with LACE index 0-4, 5-9, >9 respectively. Patients without any events had a lower MAGGIC score (19.25 ± 9.56) vs those who died (29.33 ± 8.32). H2FPEF score also performed well: re-hospitalization for HF was 22.2 vs 57.7 % and mortality was 20 vs 72 % in score <2 vs score >2.
Conclusion: These easily available risk scores can accurately predict events in Indian patients with HF and should be part of clinical workflow.
期刊介绍:
Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.