Prediction of incident heart failure and/or re-hospitalization using different risk predictor models in Indian patients.

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anupam Kumar, Aditya Kapoor, S Harikrishnan, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Arshad Nazir, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari
{"title":"Prediction of incident heart failure and/or re-hospitalization using different risk predictor models in Indian patients.","authors":"Anupam Kumar, Aditya Kapoor, S Harikrishnan, Arpita Katheria, Harshit Khare, Arshad Nazir, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Accurate prediction of incident heart failure (HF), risk of recurrent HF or hospitalization are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Seeing the rising trends of HF in Indians, the present study assessed the applicability of 5 different HF risk scores in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of the 280 patients recruited, 159 (55.7 %) had HF Stage A, B while 121 (44.3 %) had asymptomatic or symptomatic HF (HF Stage C, D). At 30 ± 7.5 months, new onset HF occurred in 32.07 % and in Stage C/D HF patients, rehospitalization was noted in 37.1 % and 8.9 % died. The incidence of new-onset HF increased incrementally with higher Health ABC scores (13.7, 31.4 and 52.9 % in score 5-10 %, 10-20 %, >20 % respectively). Amongst diabetic patients, TRS-HFDM score strongly predicted new-onset HF (16.7, 30 and 43.3 % in score 1,2 and ≥ 3 respectively). LACE index also accurately predicted events in those with Stage C/D HF: rehospitalization for recurrent HF was 6.6, 44.5 and 48.9 % while mortality was 4, 36 and 60 % in those with LACE index 0-4, 5-9, >9 respectively. Patients without any events had a lower MAGGIC score (19.25 ± 9.56) vs those who died (29.33 ± 8.32). H2FPEF score also performed well: re-hospitalization for HF was 22.2 vs 57.7 % and mortality was 20 vs 72 % in score <2 vs score >2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These easily available risk scores can accurately predict events in Indian patients with HF and should be part of clinical workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Accurate prediction of incident heart failure (HF), risk of recurrent HF or hospitalization are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Seeing the rising trends of HF in Indians, the present study assessed the applicability of 5 different HF risk scores in these patients.

Methods and results: Of the 280 patients recruited, 159 (55.7 %) had HF Stage A, B while 121 (44.3 %) had asymptomatic or symptomatic HF (HF Stage C, D). At 30 ± 7.5 months, new onset HF occurred in 32.07 % and in Stage C/D HF patients, rehospitalization was noted in 37.1 % and 8.9 % died. The incidence of new-onset HF increased incrementally with higher Health ABC scores (13.7, 31.4 and 52.9 % in score 5-10 %, 10-20 %, >20 % respectively). Amongst diabetic patients, TRS-HFDM score strongly predicted new-onset HF (16.7, 30 and 43.3 % in score 1,2 and ≥ 3 respectively). LACE index also accurately predicted events in those with Stage C/D HF: rehospitalization for recurrent HF was 6.6, 44.5 and 48.9 % while mortality was 4, 36 and 60 % in those with LACE index 0-4, 5-9, >9 respectively. Patients without any events had a lower MAGGIC score (19.25 ± 9.56) vs those who died (29.33 ± 8.32). H2FPEF score also performed well: re-hospitalization for HF was 22.2 vs 57.7 % and mortality was 20 vs 72 % in score <2 vs score >2.

Conclusion: These easily available risk scores can accurately predict events in Indian patients with HF and should be part of clinical workflow.

使用不同风险预测模型预测印度患者心力衰竭事件和/或再住院
背景和目的:准确预测心衰事件、心衰复发风险或住院治疗对于优化患者预后至关重要。鉴于印度人心衰的上升趋势,本研究评估了5种不同的心衰风险评分在这些患者中的适用性。方法和结果:在招募的280例患者中,159例(55.7%)为HF A、B期,121例(44.3%)为无症状或有症状的HF (HF C、D期)。在30 + 7.5个月时,新发HF发生率为32.07%,在C/D期HF患者中,再住院率为37.1%,死亡率为8.9%。随着健康ABC评分的升高,新发HF的发生率逐渐增加(5-10%、10-20%、> -20%评分分别为13.7%、31.4和52.9%)。在糖尿病患者中,TRS-HFDM评分对新发HF有较强的预测作用(评分1分、2分和3分分别为16.7%、30%和43.3%)。LACE指数也能准确预测C/D期HF患者的事件:在LACE指数为0-4、5-9、bb0 -9的患者中,复发性HF再住院率分别为6.6、44.5和48.9%,死亡率分别为4.36和60%。无任何事件的患者MAGGIC评分(19.25±9.56)低于死亡患者(29.33±8.32)。H2FPEF评分也表现良好:评分< 2和评分bbbb2的HF再住院率分别为22.2和57.7%,死亡率分别为20%和72%。结论:这些容易获得的风险评分可以准确预测印度心衰患者的事件,应成为临床工作流程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信