Design and selection of items for a new health-related quality of life instrument with infertility patients (Infertility-QoL): a national multicenter, four-phase, mixed-methods study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zhao Shi, Yu Zheng, Zhuxin Mao, Hongwei Nie, Gang Chen, Shunping Li
{"title":"Design and selection of items for a new health-related quality of life instrument with infertility patients (Infertility-QoL): a national multicenter, four-phase, mixed-methods study.","authors":"Zhao Shi, Yu Zheng, Zhuxin Mao, Hongwei Nie, Gang Chen, Shunping Li","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02416-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility is a global issue that significantly imposes physical and psychosocial burdens on both female and male patients, affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and family wellbeing. The aim of this study was to develop a de novo HRQoL instrument for male and female infertility patients in China, and describe the generation and selection of items for Infertility-QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed methods design involving 4 steps. The items identified from the systematic review and qualitative interview analysis were used to construct draft candidate items (step 1). In order to ensure item relevance, comprehension, and acceptability, using cognitive interviews prior to quantifying psychometric testing (step 2). In the third step, we conducted a cross-sectional quantitative offline survey for item selection. Classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) were used to assess dimensionality and performance of items. Finally, by conducting advisory committee consultations and thematic seminars, the items were further qualitatively evaluated, and developed a formal version of the Infertility-QoL (step 4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Step 1 resulted in the generation of 73 items. Based on CTT and IRT psychometric evidence, 36 items were deleted. Finally, according to the advisory committee consultations for qualitative evaluation, a formal version of the Infertility-QoL with 25 items was developed. The exploratory factor analysis results showed that the 6-factor model was appropriate. The newly developed instrument (Infertility-QoL) consisted of 25 items across six dimensions: physical health, sexual life, emotional status, self-efficacy, subjective wellbeing and social relations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed the new Infertility-QoL instrument for male and female infertility patients, and preliminarily verified its dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02416-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a global issue that significantly imposes physical and psychosocial burdens on both female and male patients, affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and family wellbeing. The aim of this study was to develop a de novo HRQoL instrument for male and female infertility patients in China, and describe the generation and selection of items for Infertility-QoL.

Methods: This study used a mixed methods design involving 4 steps. The items identified from the systematic review and qualitative interview analysis were used to construct draft candidate items (step 1). In order to ensure item relevance, comprehension, and acceptability, using cognitive interviews prior to quantifying psychometric testing (step 2). In the third step, we conducted a cross-sectional quantitative offline survey for item selection. Classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) were used to assess dimensionality and performance of items. Finally, by conducting advisory committee consultations and thematic seminars, the items were further qualitatively evaluated, and developed a formal version of the Infertility-QoL (step 4).

Results: Step 1 resulted in the generation of 73 items. Based on CTT and IRT psychometric evidence, 36 items were deleted. Finally, according to the advisory committee consultations for qualitative evaluation, a formal version of the Infertility-QoL with 25 items was developed. The exploratory factor analysis results showed that the 6-factor model was appropriate. The newly developed instrument (Infertility-QoL) consisted of 25 items across six dimensions: physical health, sexual life, emotional status, self-efficacy, subjective wellbeing and social relations.

Conclusions: This study developed the new Infertility-QoL instrument for male and female infertility patients, and preliminarily verified its dimensions.

设计和选择一种新的与不孕症患者健康相关的生活质量测量工具(不孕- qol):一项全国多中心、四阶段、混合方法的研究。
背景:不孕症是一个全球性问题,对女性和男性患者都造成了严重的身体和心理负担,影响了他们与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)和家庭福祉。本研究的目的是为中国男性和女性不孕症患者开发一种全新的HRQoL仪器,并描述不孕不育- qol项目的生成和选择。方法:本研究采用四步骤的混合方法设计。从系统评价和定性访谈分析中确定的项目用于构建候选项目草案(步骤1)。为了确保项目的相关性,理解性和可接受性,在量化心理测试之前使用认知访谈(步骤2)。在第三步,我们进行了一个横断面的定量的线下调查项目选择。采用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)评估项目的维度和表现。最后,通过咨询委员会协商和专题研讨会,对这些项目进行了进一步的定性评价,并制定了不孕症生活质量的正式版本(步骤4)。结果:步骤1生成73项。根据CTT和IRT的心理测量证据,删除了36个项目。最后,根据咨询委员会对定性评价的磋商,制定了包含25个项目的不孕症生活质量的正式版本。探索性因子分析结果表明,6因子模型是合适的。新开发的工具(不孕不育-生活质量)包括身体健康、性生活、情绪状态、自我效能、主观幸福感和社会关系六个维度的25个项目。结论:本研究开发了适用于男性和女性不孕症患者的新型不孕不育-生活质量仪,并对其尺寸进行了初步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信