Has the new GP contract in Scotland reduced health inequalities? Qualitative evaluation of the views of general practitioners working in deprived areas.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura Aitken, Eddie Donaghy, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"Has the new GP contract in Scotland reduced health inequalities? Qualitative evaluation of the views of general practitioners working in deprived areas.","authors":"Laura Aitken, Eddie Donaghy, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02609-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scotland has the widest health inequalities in western Europe and a well-documented inverse care law in general practice. Scotland introduced a new General Practitioner contract in 2018, reforming how care is delivered. Changes included expanding the primary care multidisciplinary team, and grouping practices into geographical clusters to improve quality of care for the local populations. A stated aim of the new contract was also to reduce inequalities in health. However, the effects of the reforms upon health inequalities have been little explored. This study aimed to analyse the views of General Practitioners working in deprived areas on the impact of the contract on health inequalities in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved a secondary analysis of qualitative data from one-to-one interviews with 11 GPs serving patients in deprived areas of Scotland. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite some positive opinions on some aspects of the contract, GPs in deprived areas felt that the aim of reducing inequalities had not been achieved. Reasons for this were: (1) persisting barriers to engagement for patients in deprived areas (including poor access to services, lack of patient education about the reforms, centralisation of some services, and difficulties with remote consulting), (2) inadequate support to manage patients with complex problems (including difficulty in providing continuity of care, and limited resources for patients with specific comorbidities such as mental health and chronic pain), (3) clusters in areas of deprivation lacking capacity to address health inequalities (including lack of time, lack of training, and lack of data and evaluation), and (4) a lack of workforce and strategic planning in the new contract regarding deprivation (such as suitable resource allocation and recruitment of sufficient numbers of appropriate staff in practices in deprived areas). Two additional cross-cutting themes were identified, relating to lack of time and poor relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new Scottish General Practice contract has not achieved its aim of reducing health inequalities, according to General Practitioners working in deprived areas. Future iterations of the contract need to implement changes that will tackle the inverse care law and thus help reduce inequalities in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02609-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scotland has the widest health inequalities in western Europe and a well-documented inverse care law in general practice. Scotland introduced a new General Practitioner contract in 2018, reforming how care is delivered. Changes included expanding the primary care multidisciplinary team, and grouping practices into geographical clusters to improve quality of care for the local populations. A stated aim of the new contract was also to reduce inequalities in health. However, the effects of the reforms upon health inequalities have been little explored. This study aimed to analyse the views of General Practitioners working in deprived areas on the impact of the contract on health inequalities in Scotland.

Methods: This study involved a secondary analysis of qualitative data from one-to-one interviews with 11 GPs serving patients in deprived areas of Scotland. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: Despite some positive opinions on some aspects of the contract, GPs in deprived areas felt that the aim of reducing inequalities had not been achieved. Reasons for this were: (1) persisting barriers to engagement for patients in deprived areas (including poor access to services, lack of patient education about the reforms, centralisation of some services, and difficulties with remote consulting), (2) inadequate support to manage patients with complex problems (including difficulty in providing continuity of care, and limited resources for patients with specific comorbidities such as mental health and chronic pain), (3) clusters in areas of deprivation lacking capacity to address health inequalities (including lack of time, lack of training, and lack of data and evaluation), and (4) a lack of workforce and strategic planning in the new contract regarding deprivation (such as suitable resource allocation and recruitment of sufficient numbers of appropriate staff in practices in deprived areas). Two additional cross-cutting themes were identified, relating to lack of time and poor relationships.

Conclusions: The new Scottish General Practice contract has not achieved its aim of reducing health inequalities, according to General Practitioners working in deprived areas. Future iterations of the contract need to implement changes that will tackle the inverse care law and thus help reduce inequalities in health.

苏格兰新的全科医生合同是否减少了健康不平等?贫困地区全科医生意见的定性评价。
背景:苏格兰是西欧卫生不平等最严重的国家,在一般实践中有充分记录的反保健法。苏格兰在2018年引入了一项新的全科医生合同,改革了医疗服务的提供方式。变化包括扩大初级保健多学科团队,并将实践分组到地理集群以提高对当地人口的护理质量。新合同的一个明确目标是减少保健方面的不平等现象。然而,改革对保健不平等现象的影响却鲜有探讨。这项研究的目的是分析在贫困地区工作的全科医生对合同对苏格兰健康不平等的影响的看法。方法:本研究涉及对11名在苏格兰贫困地区为患者服务的全科医生进行一对一访谈的定性数据的二次分析。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:尽管对合同的某些方面有一些积极的意见,但贫困地区的全科医生认为减少不平等的目标尚未实现。原因如下:(1)贫困地区患者参与的持续障碍(包括难以获得服务、缺乏对患者的改革教育、一些服务的集中化以及远程咨询方面的困难);(2)管理有复杂问题的患者的支持不足(包括难以提供连续性护理,以及为患有精神健康和慢性疼痛等特定合并症的患者提供的资源有限);(3)贫困地区的集群缺乏解决保健不平等问题的能力(包括缺乏时间、缺乏培训以及缺乏数据和评价);(4)新合同中缺乏关于贫困的劳动力和战略规划(例如在贫困地区的实践中适当分配资源和招聘足够数量的适当工作人员)。确定了另外两个跨领域的主题,即缺乏时间和关系不佳。结论:根据在贫困地区工作的全科医生的说法,新的苏格兰全科医生合同并没有达到减少健康不平等的目标。该合同的未来迭代需要进行修改,以解决逆向护理法,从而有助于减少健康方面的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信