Disorder at the Synapse: How the Active Inference Framework Unifies Competing Perspectives on Depression.

IF 2 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.3390/e27090970
Christopher G Davey, Paul B Badcock
{"title":"Disorder at the Synapse: How the Active Inference Framework Unifies Competing Perspectives on Depression.","authors":"Christopher G Davey, Paul B Badcock","doi":"10.3390/e27090970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression is one of the most disabling of all disorders across the community, yet many aspects of the disorder remain contentious. Psychosocial and biological perspectives are often placed in opposition to one another, which in part reflects a failure of our explanatory frameworks. The active inference account of brain function breaks down this dualism, demonstrating that bodily processes are deeply integrated with the social world. It shows us that there is no contradiction in understanding depression as a product of the social environment at the same time as having a brain basis and manifesting in biological symptoms. From an active inference perspective, depression can be thought of as a synaptopathy: a disorder that arises from alterations to the excitatory-inhibitory balance enacted at the synapse, reflecting the interoceptive precision-weightings that have changed in the context of psychosocial instability. Therapies that alleviate depressive symptoms act at different levels of the active inference framework to re-weight precision estimates and the confidence we have in our predictions: this is true for psychotherapies, lifestyle interventions and antidepressant medications. Their effectiveness is often only partial, and while different treatment modalities can complement one another, there is a need for continued development of new and better treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"27 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e27090970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression is one of the most disabling of all disorders across the community, yet many aspects of the disorder remain contentious. Psychosocial and biological perspectives are often placed in opposition to one another, which in part reflects a failure of our explanatory frameworks. The active inference account of brain function breaks down this dualism, demonstrating that bodily processes are deeply integrated with the social world. It shows us that there is no contradiction in understanding depression as a product of the social environment at the same time as having a brain basis and manifesting in biological symptoms. From an active inference perspective, depression can be thought of as a synaptopathy: a disorder that arises from alterations to the excitatory-inhibitory balance enacted at the synapse, reflecting the interoceptive precision-weightings that have changed in the context of psychosocial instability. Therapies that alleviate depressive symptoms act at different levels of the active inference framework to re-weight precision estimates and the confidence we have in our predictions: this is true for psychotherapies, lifestyle interventions and antidepressant medications. Their effectiveness is often only partial, and while different treatment modalities can complement one another, there is a need for continued development of new and better treatment options.

突触紊乱:主动推理框架如何统一抑郁症的竞争观点。
抑郁症是社会上所有疾病中致残性最强的一种,但关于这种疾病的许多方面仍存在争议。社会心理和生物学的观点往往是对立的,这在一定程度上反映了我们的解释框架的失败。对大脑功能的积极推断打破了这种二元论,表明身体过程与社会世界是深度整合的。它向我们表明,将抑郁症理解为社会环境的产物,同时又有大脑基础,表现为生物症状,这并不矛盾。从主动推理的角度来看,抑郁症可以被认为是一种突触病:一种由突触上的兴奋-抑制平衡改变引起的疾病,反映了在社会心理不稳定的背景下,内感受精确权重发生了变化。缓解抑郁症状的疗法在主动推理框架的不同层次上起作用,以重新加权精度估计和我们对预测的信心:心理疗法、生活方式干预和抗抑郁药物都是如此。它们的效果往往只是部分的,虽然不同的治疗方式可以相互补充,但仍需要继续开发新的和更好的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信