Ultrasonographic Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area and Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Laboratory Biomarkers in Electrodiagnostically Confirmed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Single-Center Correlational Study.
Hasan Kara, Hüseyin Kaplan, Fatma Nur Aba, Servin Karaca, İsa Cüce
{"title":"Ultrasonographic Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area and Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Laboratory Biomarkers in Electrodiagnostically Confirmed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Single-Center Correlational Study.","authors":"Hasan Kara, Hüseyin Kaplan, Fatma Nur Aba, Servin Karaca, İsa Cüce","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA, mm<sup>2</sup>) and clinical findings, blood test results, and electrodiagnostic (EDX) measurements in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study included 62 patients (111 hands). The median nerve CSA was assessed using ultrasound (US). The clinical assessment included symptom duration, symptom severity, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), and physical examination. Patient-level analyses used the CSA of the most symptomatic hand for clinical and laboratory variables (<i>n</i> = 62 patients). Hand-level EDX analyses accounted for within-patient clustering by reporting right and left hands separately. Associations were summarized with Spearman's ρ and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); multiplicity was addressed using Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). EDX units: latency ms, amplitude mV/µV, and velocity m/s. <b>Results:</b> CSA was not associated with global symptom burden (Visual Analog Scale; BCTQ). No laboratory marker remained significant after FDR across the full panel. By contrast, CSA correlated with EDX impairment at the hand level with low-to-moderate effect sizes; for example, distal motor latency was positively associated with CSA on the right (ρ = 0.557, 95% CI 0.334-0.733) and left (ρ = 0.318, 95% CI 0.022-0.578). CSA also correlated positively with CTS EDX severity (right: ρ = 0.449, 95% CI 0.223-0.646; left: ρ = 0.354, 95% CI 0.071-0.609). <b>Conclusions:</b> Ultrasonographic CSA was associated with electrophysiologic impairment and was not associated with overall symptom burden; laboratory signals did not survive FDR control. Accordingly, CSA may serve as a complementary morphologic adjunct to clinical assessment and EDX, with limited utility as a stand-alone severity metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA, mm2) and clinical findings, blood test results, and electrodiagnostic (EDX) measurements in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 62 patients (111 hands). The median nerve CSA was assessed using ultrasound (US). The clinical assessment included symptom duration, symptom severity, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), and physical examination. Patient-level analyses used the CSA of the most symptomatic hand for clinical and laboratory variables (n = 62 patients). Hand-level EDX analyses accounted for within-patient clustering by reporting right and left hands separately. Associations were summarized with Spearman's ρ and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); multiplicity was addressed using Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). EDX units: latency ms, amplitude mV/µV, and velocity m/s. Results: CSA was not associated with global symptom burden (Visual Analog Scale; BCTQ). No laboratory marker remained significant after FDR across the full panel. By contrast, CSA correlated with EDX impairment at the hand level with low-to-moderate effect sizes; for example, distal motor latency was positively associated with CSA on the right (ρ = 0.557, 95% CI 0.334-0.733) and left (ρ = 0.318, 95% CI 0.022-0.578). CSA also correlated positively with CTS EDX severity (right: ρ = 0.449, 95% CI 0.223-0.646; left: ρ = 0.354, 95% CI 0.071-0.609). Conclusions: Ultrasonographic CSA was associated with electrophysiologic impairment and was not associated with overall symptom burden; laboratory signals did not survive FDR control. Accordingly, CSA may serve as a complementary morphologic adjunct to clinical assessment and EDX, with limited utility as a stand-alone severity metric.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.