A Comparative Evaluation of Meta-Learning Models for Few-Shot Chest X-Ray Disease Classification.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Luis-Carlos Quiñonez-Baca, Graciela Ramirez-Alonso, Fernando Gaxiola, Alain Manzo-Martinez, Raymundo Cornejo, David R Lopez-Flores
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Meta-Learning Models for Few-Shot Chest X-Ray Disease Classification.","authors":"Luis-Carlos Quiñonez-Baca, Graciela Ramirez-Alonso, Fernando Gaxiola, Alain Manzo-Martinez, Raymundo Cornejo, David R Lopez-Flores","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The limited availability of labeled data, particularly in the medical domain, poses a significant challenge for training accurate diagnostic models. While deep learning techniques have demonstrated notable efficacy in image-based tasks, they require large annotated datasets. In data-scarce scenarios-especially involving rare diseases-their performance deteriorates significantly. Meta-learning offers a promising alternative by enabling models to adapt quickly to new tasks using prior knowledge and only a few labeled examples. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of representative meta-learning models for thoracic disease classification in chest X-rays. <b>Methods</b>: We conduct a comparative evaluation of four meta-learning models: Prototypical Networks, Relation Networks, MAML, and FoMAML. First, we assess five backbone architectures (ConvNeXt, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, and ViT) using a Prototypical Network. The best-performing backbone is then used across all meta-learning models for fair comparison. Experiments are performed on the ChestX-ray14 dataset under a 2-way setting with multiple <i>k</i>-shot configurations. <b>Results</b>: Prototypical Networks combined with DenseNet-121 achieved the best performance, with a recall of 68.1%, an F1-score of 67.4%, and a precision of 0.693 in the 2-way, 10-shot configuration. In a disease-specific analysis, Hernia obtains the best classification results. Furthermore, Prototypical and Relation Networks demonstrate significantly higher computational efficiency, requiring fewer FLOPs and shorter execution times than MAML and FoMAML. <b>Conclusions</b>: Prototype-based meta-learning, particularly with DenseNet-121, proves to be a robust and computationally efficient approach for few-shot chest X-ray disease classification. These findings highlight its potential for real-world clinical applications, especially in scenarios with limited annotated medical data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The limited availability of labeled data, particularly in the medical domain, poses a significant challenge for training accurate diagnostic models. While deep learning techniques have demonstrated notable efficacy in image-based tasks, they require large annotated datasets. In data-scarce scenarios-especially involving rare diseases-their performance deteriorates significantly. Meta-learning offers a promising alternative by enabling models to adapt quickly to new tasks using prior knowledge and only a few labeled examples. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of representative meta-learning models for thoracic disease classification in chest X-rays. Methods: We conduct a comparative evaluation of four meta-learning models: Prototypical Networks, Relation Networks, MAML, and FoMAML. First, we assess five backbone architectures (ConvNeXt, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, and ViT) using a Prototypical Network. The best-performing backbone is then used across all meta-learning models for fair comparison. Experiments are performed on the ChestX-ray14 dataset under a 2-way setting with multiple k-shot configurations. Results: Prototypical Networks combined with DenseNet-121 achieved the best performance, with a recall of 68.1%, an F1-score of 67.4%, and a precision of 0.693 in the 2-way, 10-shot configuration. In a disease-specific analysis, Hernia obtains the best classification results. Furthermore, Prototypical and Relation Networks demonstrate significantly higher computational efficiency, requiring fewer FLOPs and shorter execution times than MAML and FoMAML. Conclusions: Prototype-based meta-learning, particularly with DenseNet-121, proves to be a robust and computationally efficient approach for few-shot chest X-ray disease classification. These findings highlight its potential for real-world clinical applications, especially in scenarios with limited annotated medical data.

几次胸片疾病分类元学习模型的比较评价。
背景/目的:标记数据的有限可用性,特别是在医学领域,对训练准确的诊断模型提出了重大挑战。虽然深度学习技术在基于图像的任务中表现出了显著的功效,但它们需要大量带注释的数据集。在数据匮乏的情况下,尤其是涉及罕见疾病的情况下,它们的性能会显著下降。元学习提供了一个很有前途的选择,它使模型能够使用先验知识和少量标记示例快速适应新任务。本研究旨在评估具有代表性的元学习模型在胸部x光片中胸部疾病分类的有效性。方法:我们对四种元学习模型进行了比较评估:原型网络、关系网络、MAML和faml。首先,我们使用原型网络评估了五种骨干架构(ConvNeXt, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2和ViT)。然后在所有元学习模型中使用表现最好的主干进行公平比较。实验在chex -ray14数据集上进行,采用双路设置和多个k-shot配置。结果:结合DenseNet-121的Prototypical Networks在2路10次配置下的召回率为68.1%,f1得分为67.4%,准确率为0.693。在疾病特异性分析中,疝获得最好的分类结果。此外,与MAML和faml相比,Prototypical和Relation Networks显示出更高的计算效率,需要更少的FLOPs和更短的执行时间。结论:基于原型的元学习,特别是DenseNet-121,被证明是一种鲁棒且计算效率高的胸片疾病分类方法。这些发现突出了其在现实世界临床应用的潜力,特别是在医疗数据有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信