Factors Associated with the Detection of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Liquid Biopsy in Biliary Tract Cancer.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.3390/cancers17183071
Hiroshi Shimizu, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Keisuke Kudo, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiromasa Ohira
{"title":"Factors Associated with the Detection of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Liquid Biopsy in Biliary Tract Cancer.","authors":"Hiroshi Shimizu, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Keisuke Kudo, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiromasa Ohira","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan's C-CAT (June 2019-January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, <i>FGFR2</i>/<i>RET</i>/<i>NTRK</i> fusions, <i>BRAF</i> V600E, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, <i>IDH1</i> mutations, and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0-4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne<sup>®</sup> Liquid). <b>Results</b>: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, <i>IDH1</i>, <i>KRAS</i> G12C, or <i>BRAF</i> V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. <b>Conclusions</b>: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan's C-CAT (June 2019-January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne® CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, FGFR2/RET/NTRK fusions, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, IDH1 mutations, and ERBB2 amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0-4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne® Liquid). Results: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; p < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90; p = 0.01) and ERBB2 amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57; p < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, IDH1, KRAS G12C, or BRAF V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. Conclusions: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate.

胆道癌液体活检检测可操作基因组改变的相关因素。
背景:基于血液的综合基因组谱(CGP)是液体活检的一种形式,通常用于胆道癌(BTC),当基于组织的CGP(组织CGP)不可用时,尽管检出率较低。本研究探讨了与检测可操作的基因组改变相关的因素,以优化其使用。方法:回顾性分析日本C-CAT(2019年6月- 2025年1月)的BTC病例,限制面板比较FoundationOne®CDx (F1, n = 5019)和FoundationOne®Liquid CDx (F1L, n = 1550)。缺失的协变量通过多次插值处理(m = 20)。面板间平衡使用1:1的倾向-得分匹配(卡尺0.2)。结果采用逻辑回归建模。靶点包括MSI-H、TMB-H、FGFR2/RET/NTRK融合、BRAF V600E、KRAS G12C、IDH1突变和ERBB2扩增。探索性分析通过预先指定的富集因子(0-4)的数量对结果进行分层。液体活检采用基于血浆的综合基因组分析(FoundationOne®Liquid)。结果:漏诊率低;匹配后(每组n = 1549)协变量平衡良好(|SMD|均≤0.05)。F1L对任何可操作改变的检出率低于F1(16.8%比24.8%;OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75; p < 0.001)。F1L也有较低的TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43-0.90, p = 0.01)和ERBB2扩增(OR 0.42, 0.31-0.57, p < 0.001), MSI-H、IDH1、KRAS G12C和BRAF V600E无显著差异。在F1L中,非门周位置(OR 2.05)、肝脏(OR 1.90)、淋巴结(OR 1.41)和肺转移(OR 1.52)预测了可操作的基因组改变的检测。F1L检出率从5.8%(零因素)增加到32.8%(四因素),接近组织在三个因素。结论:在提高检出率的条件下,仔细选择样本,可以最大限度地发挥液体活检的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信