Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Aligning Guideline Recommendations with Real-World Evidence.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.3390/cancers17183085
Roberto Cammarata, Alberto Catamerò, Vincenzo La Vaccara, Roberto Coppola, Damiano Caputo
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Aligning Guideline Recommendations with Real-World Evidence.","authors":"Roberto Cammarata, Alberto Catamerò, Vincenzo La Vaccara, Roberto Coppola, Damiano Caputo","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year overall survival below 12% and high recurrence rates even after R0 resection. Traditionally managed with a \"surgery-first\" approach, two consistent observations-the near-universal presence of micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and the frequent inability to complete adjuvant therapy-have driven the integration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) into clinical practice. NAT offers several theoretical and practical advantages: early systemic control of occult disease, improved delivery and completion of multimodal treatment, biological selection of surgical candidates, and increased R0 resection rates. While in borderline resectable PDAC, randomized trials have consistently demonstrated improved margin-negative resection rates and early survival benefits compared with upfront surgery, in resectable PDAC, evidence is more heterogeneous. Real-world studies corroborate trial findings, reporting higher R0 rates and reduced lymph node positivity without increased perioperative risk, but also highlight substantial heterogeneity in regimens, duration, and radiotherapy use. Limitations to universal NAT adoption include reliance on anatomy-based resectability criteria, absence of validated predictive biomarkers, challenges in response assessment, and concerns over disease progression during preoperative treatment. Future developments will focus on integrating molecular profiling, circulating tumor DNA dynamics, and advanced imaging into patient selection and treatment adaptation, supported by biomarker-enriched and adaptive trial designs. NAT is thus evolving from a selective strategy for borderline disease to an innovative framework to optimize multimodal treatment delivery and refine patient selection in PDAC, with the potential to improve surgical outcomes and inform systemic therapy decisions in both resectable and borderline resectable settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with a 5-year overall survival below 12% and high recurrence rates even after R0 resection. Traditionally managed with a "surgery-first" approach, two consistent observations-the near-universal presence of micrometastatic disease at diagnosis and the frequent inability to complete adjuvant therapy-have driven the integration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) into clinical practice. NAT offers several theoretical and practical advantages: early systemic control of occult disease, improved delivery and completion of multimodal treatment, biological selection of surgical candidates, and increased R0 resection rates. While in borderline resectable PDAC, randomized trials have consistently demonstrated improved margin-negative resection rates and early survival benefits compared with upfront surgery, in resectable PDAC, evidence is more heterogeneous. Real-world studies corroborate trial findings, reporting higher R0 rates and reduced lymph node positivity without increased perioperative risk, but also highlight substantial heterogeneity in regimens, duration, and radiotherapy use. Limitations to universal NAT adoption include reliance on anatomy-based resectability criteria, absence of validated predictive biomarkers, challenges in response assessment, and concerns over disease progression during preoperative treatment. Future developments will focus on integrating molecular profiling, circulating tumor DNA dynamics, and advanced imaging into patient selection and treatment adaptation, supported by biomarker-enriched and adaptive trial designs. NAT is thus evolving from a selective strategy for borderline disease to an innovative framework to optimize multimodal treatment delivery and refine patient selection in PDAC, with the potential to improve surgical outcomes and inform systemic therapy decisions in both resectable and borderline resectable settings.

胰腺导管腺癌的新辅助治疗:与现实世界证据一致的指南建议。
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)仍然是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,5年总生存率低于12%,即使在R0切除术后复发率也很高。传统上以“手术优先”的方法进行治疗,两个一致的观察结果——诊断时几乎普遍存在的微转移性疾病和经常无法完成辅助治疗——推动了新辅助治疗(NAT)融入临床实践。NAT提供了几个理论和实践优势:早期系统控制隐匿性疾病,改善交付和完成多模式治疗,生物选择手术候选人,提高R0切除率。虽然在边缘可切除的PDAC中,随机试验一致表明,与前期手术相比,边缘阴性切除率和早期生存获益有所提高,但在可切除的PDAC中,证据更加多样化。真实世界的研究证实了试验结果,报告了更高的R0率和更低的淋巴结阳性,但没有增加围手术期风险,但也强调了方案、持续时间和放疗使用的实质性异质性。普遍采用NAT的限制包括依赖于基于解剖的可切除性标准,缺乏经过验证的预测性生物标志物,反应评估方面的挑战,以及对术前治疗期间疾病进展的担忧。未来的发展将集中于将分子分析、循环肿瘤DNA动力学和先进成像整合到患者选择和治疗适应中,并支持生物标志物富集和适应性试验设计。因此,NAT正在从一种边缘性疾病的选择性策略演变为一种创新的框架,以优化PDAC的多模式治疗交付和细化患者选择,具有改善手术结果的潜力,并为可切除和边缘性可切除环境的全身治疗决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信