Centralized Surgical Care Improves Survival in Non-Functional Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.3390/cancers17183030
Ahmed Alnajar, Amber Collier, Mehmet Akcin, John I Lew, Tanaz M Vaghaiwalla
{"title":"Centralized Surgical Care Improves Survival in Non-Functional Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.","authors":"Ahmed Alnajar, Amber Collier, Mehmet Akcin, John I Lew, Tanaz M Vaghaiwalla","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Non-functional well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-PanNETs) are complex, heterogeneous malignancies with variable prognosis. Despite guideline recommendations, disparities in access to specialized care may impact survival. This study examines whether treatment facility type, geographic travel distance, and treatment modalities are associated with survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with WD-PanNETs. <b>Results:</b> Among 20,174 patients with WD-PanNETs, the median age was 62 years (IQR: 52-70), and 54% were men. The majority were treated at non-academic hospitals (76%), with 2.9% traveling >250 miles for care. Patients treated at non-academic hospitals (24%) had 50% lower 15-year survival rates compared to those treated at academic hospitals (58%) and integrated hospitals (56%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients traveling >250 miles had a 72% 15-year survival rate, compared to 43% for those traveling <12.5 miles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the context of facility-type and geographic distance, treatment at non-academic hospitals <250 miles was associated with a 21% higher mortality risk (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and treatment at low-volume hospitals increased mortality risk by 25% (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, primary tumor resection was associated with a 64% reduction in mortality risk (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.33-0.38, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which remained significant at all disease stages. <b>Conclusion:</b> Treatment at academic or high-volume centers and longer travel distances were associated with improved OS in patients with WD-PanNETs. Primary tumor resection remains critical, while systemic therapies were primarily used in later-stage disease. These findings support policies that improve access to centralized, multidisciplinary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-functional well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WD-PanNETs) are complex, heterogeneous malignancies with variable prognosis. Despite guideline recommendations, disparities in access to specialized care may impact survival. This study examines whether treatment facility type, geographic travel distance, and treatment modalities are associated with survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with WD-PanNETs. Results: Among 20,174 patients with WD-PanNETs, the median age was 62 years (IQR: 52-70), and 54% were men. The majority were treated at non-academic hospitals (76%), with 2.9% traveling >250 miles for care. Patients treated at non-academic hospitals (24%) had 50% lower 15-year survival rates compared to those treated at academic hospitals (58%) and integrated hospitals (56%) (p < 0.001). Patients traveling >250 miles had a 72% 15-year survival rate, compared to 43% for those traveling <12.5 miles (p < 0.001). In the context of facility-type and geographic distance, treatment at non-academic hospitals <250 miles was associated with a 21% higher mortality risk (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31, p < 0.001), and treatment at low-volume hospitals increased mortality risk by 25% (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37, p < 0.001). In contrast, primary tumor resection was associated with a 64% reduction in mortality risk (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.33-0.38, p < 0.001), which remained significant at all disease stages. Conclusion: Treatment at academic or high-volume centers and longer travel distances were associated with improved OS in patients with WD-PanNETs. Primary tumor resection remains critical, while systemic therapies were primarily used in later-stage disease. These findings support policies that improve access to centralized, multidisciplinary care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

集中手术治疗提高无功能高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的生存率。
背景:非功能性高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(WD-PanNETs)是一种复杂、异质性、预后多变的恶性肿瘤。尽管有指南建议,但在获得专业护理方面的差异可能会影响生存。本研究探讨了治疗设施类型、地理旅行距离和治疗方式是否与WD-PanNETs患者的生存结果相关。结果:20174例WD-PanNETs患者中位年龄为62岁(IQR: 52-70),男性占54%。大多数人在非学术医院接受治疗(76%),2.9%的人在250英里以外的地方接受治疗。与在学术医院(58%)和综合医院(56%)治疗的患者相比,在非学术医院治疗的患者(24%)15年生存率低50% (p < 0.001)。旅行250英里的患者15年生存率为72%,而旅行p < 0.001的患者为43%)。在设施类型和地理距离的背景下,在非学术医院治疗(p < 0.001)和在小容量医院治疗使死亡风险增加25% (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37, p < 0.001)。相比之下,原发肿瘤切除与死亡风险降低64%相关(HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.33-0.38, p < 0.001),这在所有疾病阶段都是显著的。结论:在学术或大容量中心治疗以及较长的旅行距离与WD-PanNETs患者的OS改善相关。原发肿瘤切除仍然至关重要,而系统性治疗主要用于晚期疾病。这些发现支持改善获得集中多学科护理的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信