William Stramke, Luca Tonellotto, Emmanuella Guenova, François Kuonen
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Surgical Margin Assessment of High-Risk Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"William Stramke, Luca Tonellotto, Emmanuella Guenova, François Kuonen","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Accurate margin assessment during surgical treatment is essential to prevent recurrences of BCC. Mohs surgery or alternative peripheral and deep en-face margin assessment (PDEMA) based on conventional histopathology are considered the gold standard for excising high-risk BCC, as it allows stepwise and complete examination of peripheral and deep margins. However, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. EVCM has emerged as a promising alternative, allowing rapid intraoperative evaluation of fresh excised tissue. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the diagnostic accuracy of EVCM in a PDEMA workflow of high-risk nodular BCCs. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective monocentric study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) between March 2024 and May 2025. A total of 51 patients with histologically confirmed nodular BCCs considered as high-risk and thus addressed for EVCM-assisted excision were included, yielding 171 surgical margin samples. EVCM and conventional histology-based PDEMA analyses were compared. <b>Results:</b> EVCM achieved an overall sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI: 71.7-98.9%) and specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 95.2-99.7%) compared to conventional histology. The positive and negative predictive values were 88.2% (95% CI: 63.6-97.4%) and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.4-99.9%), respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> EVCM demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for the intraoperative PDEMA of high-risk, nodular BCC. Its integration in PDEMA surgical workflows may improve efficiency, although confirmatory studies are needed in broader clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Accurate margin assessment during surgical treatment is essential to prevent recurrences of BCC. Mohs surgery or alternative peripheral and deep en-face margin assessment (PDEMA) based on conventional histopathology are considered the gold standard for excising high-risk BCC, as it allows stepwise and complete examination of peripheral and deep margins. However, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. EVCM has emerged as a promising alternative, allowing rapid intraoperative evaluation of fresh excised tissue. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of EVCM in a PDEMA workflow of high-risk nodular BCCs. Methods: A retrospective monocentric study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) between March 2024 and May 2025. A total of 51 patients with histologically confirmed nodular BCCs considered as high-risk and thus addressed for EVCM-assisted excision were included, yielding 171 surgical margin samples. EVCM and conventional histology-based PDEMA analyses were compared. Results: EVCM achieved an overall sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI: 71.7-98.9%) and specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 95.2-99.7%) compared to conventional histology. The positive and negative predictive values were 88.2% (95% CI: 63.6-97.4%) and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.4-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion: EVCM demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for the intraoperative PDEMA of high-risk, nodular BCC. Its integration in PDEMA surgical workflows may improve efficiency, although confirmatory studies are needed in broader clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.