A Deep Learning Framework for Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Whole Slide Images.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-13 DOI:10.3390/cancers17182991
Amir Hadjifaradji, Michael Diaz-Stewart, Jenny Chu, David Farnell, David Schaeffer, Hossein Farahani, Ali Bashashati, Jonathan M Loree
{"title":"A Deep Learning Framework for Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Whole Slide Images.","authors":"Amir Hadjifaradji, Michael Diaz-Stewart, Jenny Chu, David Farnell, David Schaeffer, Hossein Farahani, Ali Bashashati, Jonathan M Loree","doi":"10.3390/cancers17182991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are uncommon neoplasms. Grading informs the prognosis and treatment decision of NENs and is determined by cell proliferation, which is measured by mitotic count and Ki-67 index. These measurements present challenges for pathologists as they suffer inter- and intra-observer variability and are cumbersome to quantify. To address these challenges, we developed a machine learning pipeline for identifying tumor areas, proliferating cells, and grading NENs. <b>Methods</b>: Our study includes 385 samples of gastroenteropancreatic NENs from across British Columbia with two stains (247 H&E and 138 Ki-67 images). Labels for these cases are at the patient-level, and there are 186 patients. We systematically investigated three settings for our study: H&E, H&E with Ki-67, and pathologist-reviewed and corrected cases. <b>Results</b>: Our H&E framework achieved a three-fold balanced accuracy of 77.5% in NEN grading. The H&E with Ki-67 framework yields a performance improvement to 83.0% on grading. We provide survival and multivariate analysis with a c-index of 0.65. Grade 1 NENs misclassified by the model were reviewed by a pathologist to assess reasons. Analysis of our AI-graded NENs for the subset of pathologist-assessed G1s demonstrated a significant (<i>p</i>-value = 0.007) survival difference amongst samples the algorithm assigned to a higher grade (<i>n</i> = 20; median survival 4.22 years) compared to concordant G1 samples (<i>n</i> = 60; median survival 10.13 years). <b>Conclusions</b>: Our model identifies NEN grades with high accuracy and identified some grade 1 tumors as prognostically unique, suggesting potential improvements to standard grading. Further studies are needed to determine if this discordant group is a different clinical entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are uncommon neoplasms. Grading informs the prognosis and treatment decision of NENs and is determined by cell proliferation, which is measured by mitotic count and Ki-67 index. These measurements present challenges for pathologists as they suffer inter- and intra-observer variability and are cumbersome to quantify. To address these challenges, we developed a machine learning pipeline for identifying tumor areas, proliferating cells, and grading NENs. Methods: Our study includes 385 samples of gastroenteropancreatic NENs from across British Columbia with two stains (247 H&E and 138 Ki-67 images). Labels for these cases are at the patient-level, and there are 186 patients. We systematically investigated three settings for our study: H&E, H&E with Ki-67, and pathologist-reviewed and corrected cases. Results: Our H&E framework achieved a three-fold balanced accuracy of 77.5% in NEN grading. The H&E with Ki-67 framework yields a performance improvement to 83.0% on grading. We provide survival and multivariate analysis with a c-index of 0.65. Grade 1 NENs misclassified by the model were reviewed by a pathologist to assess reasons. Analysis of our AI-graded NENs for the subset of pathologist-assessed G1s demonstrated a significant (p-value = 0.007) survival difference amongst samples the algorithm assigned to a higher grade (n = 20; median survival 4.22 years) compared to concordant G1 samples (n = 60; median survival 10.13 years). Conclusions: Our model identifies NEN grades with high accuracy and identified some grade 1 tumors as prognostically unique, suggesting potential improvements to standard grading. Further studies are needed to determine if this discordant group is a different clinical entity.

神经内分泌肿瘤全片图像分类的深度学习框架。
背景/目的:神经内分泌肿瘤(NENs)是一种罕见的肿瘤。分级决定NENs的预后和治疗决策,并由细胞增殖决定,细胞增殖由有丝分裂计数和Ki-67指数测量。这些测量对病理学家提出了挑战,因为它们遭受观察者之间和内部的变异性,并且难于量化。为了应对这些挑战,我们开发了一种机器学习管道,用于识别肿瘤区域、增殖细胞和对nen进行分级。方法:我们的研究包括385份来自不列颠哥伦比亚省的胃肠胰腺NENs样本,两种染色(247张H&E图像和138张Ki-67图像)。这些病例的标签是在患者层面上的,共有186名患者。我们系统地调查了三种情况:H&E, Ki-67 H&E,病理检查和纠正的病例。结果:我们的H&E框架在NEN分级中实现了77.5%的三倍平衡精度。采用Ki-67框架的H&E在评分方面的表现提高了83.0%。我们提供了生存率和多变量分析,c指数为0.65。由病理学家对模型错误分类的1级NENs进行审查以评估原因。我们对经病理评估的G1组的ai分级NENs进行分析,结果显示,与G1组(n = 60,中位生存期10.13年)相比,分级较高的G1组样本(n = 20,中位生存期4.22年)存在显著(p值= 0.007)的生存差异。结论:我们的模型能够高精度地识别NEN的分级,并识别出一些预后独特的1级肿瘤,这提示了标准分级的潜在改进。需要进一步的研究来确定这个不一致的群体是否是一个不同的临床实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信