Help provided by community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
S F F Groenestein, M Bussemaker, S van der Pas
{"title":"Help provided by community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"S F F Groenestein, M Bussemaker, S van der Pas","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06356-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global expansion of the COVID-19 virus led many countries, including the Netherlands, to implement socially restrictive measures to protect vulnerable groups from the virus, without considering negative consequences. Older individuals show large differences in vulnerability, but were defined as vulnerable, overlooking their strengths and resilience. We aim to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictive measures on provided help by community dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands; and (2) to examine the cross-sectional effect of social capital and mental wellbeing on the provided help.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Impact Corona study from October/November 2020. Community-dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands, aged 65 years and older, completed an online questionnaire. Providing help was measured by 'already providing help' to at least one of the defined subgroups for the question 'To what extent are you willing to offer help to (group) during the covid-19 pandemic?'. Followed by the question of what type of assistance this was, such as grocery shopping. Social capital was measured by the amount of social contact, trust in people in general, knowing sufficient people who could provide help and provided help in the neighborhood. Mental wellbeing was measured by questions about feeling more anxious, stressed and staying home during the pandemic. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7,616 Older individuals participated in this study. About one third (32.9%) of the older individuals provided help during the COVID-19 pandemic (56.2% female, 73.4% multi-person household, 60.4% in good health). The majority provided the same (60.9%) or more (29.7%) help than before the pandemic and had a higher social capital, and a better mental wellbeing, compared to older individuals who did not provide help.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, a third of the older individuals still provided help and remained socially involved during the pandemic. They had high social capital and mental well-being, supporting their helping behavior. When developing future restrictive measures, a distinction based on health and vulnerability should be prioritized over one based primarily on age, to prevent the emergence of a different form of vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06356-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global expansion of the COVID-19 virus led many countries, including the Netherlands, to implement socially restrictive measures to protect vulnerable groups from the virus, without considering negative consequences. Older individuals show large differences in vulnerability, but were defined as vulnerable, overlooking their strengths and resilience. We aim to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictive measures on provided help by community dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands; and (2) to examine the cross-sectional effect of social capital and mental wellbeing on the provided help.

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Impact Corona study from October/November 2020. Community-dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands, aged 65 years and older, completed an online questionnaire. Providing help was measured by 'already providing help' to at least one of the defined subgroups for the question 'To what extent are you willing to offer help to (group) during the covid-19 pandemic?'. Followed by the question of what type of assistance this was, such as grocery shopping. Social capital was measured by the amount of social contact, trust in people in general, knowing sufficient people who could provide help and provided help in the neighborhood. Mental wellbeing was measured by questions about feeling more anxious, stressed and staying home during the pandemic. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses.

Results: 7,616 Older individuals participated in this study. About one third (32.9%) of the older individuals provided help during the COVID-19 pandemic (56.2% female, 73.4% multi-person household, 60.4% in good health). The majority provided the same (60.9%) or more (29.7%) help than before the pandemic and had a higher social capital, and a better mental wellbeing, compared to older individuals who did not provide help.

Conclusions: Overall, a third of the older individuals still provided help and remained socially involved during the pandemic. They had high social capital and mental well-being, supporting their helping behavior. When developing future restrictive measures, a distinction based on health and vulnerability should be prioritized over one based primarily on age, to prevent the emergence of a different form of vulnerability.

Abstract Image

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间荷兰社区居住老年人提供的帮助。
背景:COVID-19病毒在全球的蔓延导致包括荷兰在内的许多国家实施了社会限制性措施,以保护弱势群体免受该病毒的侵害,而不考虑负面后果。老年人在脆弱性方面表现出很大的差异,但被定义为脆弱,忽视了他们的优势和韧性。我们的目标是调查2019冠状病毒病大流行及其限制措施对荷兰社区居住老年人提供帮助的影响;(2)考察社会资本和心理健康对提供帮助的横截面影响。方法:这项横断面研究利用了2020年10月/ 11月的冲击电晕研究数据。居住在荷兰社区的65岁及以上的老年人完成了一份在线问卷。在“在covid-19大流行期间,你愿意在多大程度上向(群体)提供帮助”的问题中,通过“已经向至少一个定义的子群体提供帮助”来衡量提供帮助。接下来的问题是这是什么类型的帮助,比如去杂货店买东西。社会资本是通过社会接触的数量来衡量的,对他人的信任,认识足够多可以提供帮助的人,并在附近提供帮助。心理健康是通过在大流行期间感到更焦虑、压力更大和呆在家里等问题来衡量的。数据分析采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析。结果:7616名老年人参与了这项研究。约三分之一(32.9%)的老年人在COVID-19大流行期间提供了帮助(56.2%为女性,73.4%为多人家庭,60.4%健康状况良好)。与不提供帮助的老年人相比,大多数人提供的帮助与疫情前相同(60.9%)或更多(29.7%),并且拥有更高的社会资本和更好的心理健康。结论:总体而言,三分之一的老年人在大流行期间仍然提供帮助并保持社会参与。他们有较高的社会资本和心理健康,支持他们的助人行为。在制定今后的限制性措施时,应优先考虑基于健康和脆弱性的区分,而不是主要基于年龄的区分,以防止出现不同形式的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信