Wenjuan Lei, Yan Duan, Mingyan Xin, Min Tian, Jia Xu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/CS/REL): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.","authors":"Wenjuan Lei, Yan Duan, Mingyan Xin, Min Tian, Jia Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relebactam is a new inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases. The FDA has approved combining IMI/CS/REL to treat some infectious diseases. This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of IMI/CS/REL based on existing clinical trials so as to provide a reference for follow-up research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Mar 28, 2025, with \"Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam\" or \"IMI/CS/REL\" as keywords, and screened the results according to the proposed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the day 28/30 all-cause mortality, clinical response rate, microbiological response rate, the adverse event response rate and drug-related adverse reaction rate were evaluated using R (4.4.3). The evaluation results were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% confidence limit (RR, 95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs (1606 subjects) were involved in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between IMI/CS/REL and comparators in day 28/30 all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10), in clinical response rate during the early follow-up period (EFU) (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67) and in microbiological response at EFU (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76). The adverse events (AEs) rate also showed no statistical difference in each study's arms (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMI/CS/REL demonstrates a non-inferior efficacy and safety profile compared to standard comparators in treating carbapenem-susceptible or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, more robust clinical evidence-especially in resistant, polymicrobial, and pathogen-defined infections-is needed to fully establish its role in real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Relebactam is a new inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases. The FDA has approved combining IMI/CS/REL to treat some infectious diseases. This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of IMI/CS/REL based on existing clinical trials so as to provide a reference for follow-up research.
Methods: Researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Mar 28, 2025, with "Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam" or "IMI/CS/REL" as keywords, and screened the results according to the proposed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the day 28/30 all-cause mortality, clinical response rate, microbiological response rate, the adverse event response rate and drug-related adverse reaction rate were evaluated using R (4.4.3). The evaluation results were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% confidence limit (RR, 95%CI).
Results: Six RCTs (1606 subjects) were involved in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between IMI/CS/REL and comparators in day 28/30 all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10), in clinical response rate during the early follow-up period (EFU) (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67) and in microbiological response at EFU (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76). The adverse events (AEs) rate also showed no statistical difference in each study's arms (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.87).
Conclusions: IMI/CS/REL demonstrates a non-inferior efficacy and safety profile compared to standard comparators in treating carbapenem-susceptible or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, more robust clinical evidence-especially in resistant, polymicrobial, and pathogen-defined infections-is needed to fully establish its role in real-world practice.
期刊介绍:
BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.