In Vitro and In Vivo Comparisons of Activated Charcoal and Biochar as Dietary Treatments for Controlling Boar Taint.

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomolecules Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI:10.3390/biom15091257
Melissa Parent, Christine Bone, Lee-Anne Huber, E James Squires
{"title":"In Vitro and In Vivo Comparisons of Activated Charcoal and Biochar as Dietary Treatments for Controlling Boar Taint.","authors":"Melissa Parent, Christine Bone, Lee-Anne Huber, E James Squires","doi":"10.3390/biom15091257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activated charcoal (AC) is an adsorbent that can prevent the accumulation of boar taint-causing compounds in the fat, but is not an approved dietary additive for livestock animals. Biochar (BC) is a similar feed-approved charcoal adsorbent that may be an alternative dietary additive to control boar taint. This study was conducted to evaluate AC and BC, both in vitro and in vivo, as dietary treatments for boar taint. This was done by first conducting an in vitro binding study to compare binding between AC, BC, and spent filter aid (SFA) for boar taint compounds. Results of the in vitro study showed that both AC and BC had significantly higher <i>B<sub>max</sub></i> for androstenone (AC: 97.2 ± 0.4% and BC: 84.5 ± 0.8%) and skatole (AC: 106.1 ± 0.2%, BC: 113.2 ± 0.7%), compared to SFA with a <i>B<sub>max</sub></i> of 50.5 ± 0.2% for androstenone and 97.1 ± 5.3% for skatole. AC and BC were then tested as feed additives in finisher diets fed to slaughter weight boars. Both adsorbents were successful at preventing boar taint in a subset of animals (83%), while having no effect on plasma levels of estrone sulfate or androstenone, and growth and performance parameters. These findings suggest that BC is a suitable alternative for AC as a dietary additive to prevent boar taint.</p>","PeriodicalId":8943,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15091257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Activated charcoal (AC) is an adsorbent that can prevent the accumulation of boar taint-causing compounds in the fat, but is not an approved dietary additive for livestock animals. Biochar (BC) is a similar feed-approved charcoal adsorbent that may be an alternative dietary additive to control boar taint. This study was conducted to evaluate AC and BC, both in vitro and in vivo, as dietary treatments for boar taint. This was done by first conducting an in vitro binding study to compare binding between AC, BC, and spent filter aid (SFA) for boar taint compounds. Results of the in vitro study showed that both AC and BC had significantly higher Bmax for androstenone (AC: 97.2 ± 0.4% and BC: 84.5 ± 0.8%) and skatole (AC: 106.1 ± 0.2%, BC: 113.2 ± 0.7%), compared to SFA with a Bmax of 50.5 ± 0.2% for androstenone and 97.1 ± 5.3% for skatole. AC and BC were then tested as feed additives in finisher diets fed to slaughter weight boars. Both adsorbents were successful at preventing boar taint in a subset of animals (83%), while having no effect on plasma levels of estrone sulfate or androstenone, and growth and performance parameters. These findings suggest that BC is a suitable alternative for AC as a dietary additive to prevent boar taint.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

活性炭和生物炭防治公猪粪臭的体内外比较。
活性炭(AC)是一种吸附剂,可以防止公猪脂肪中引起公猪污染的化合物的积累,但不是一种被批准的牲畜饲料添加剂。生物炭(BC)是一种类似的饲料批准的木炭吸附剂,可能是一种替代的日粮添加剂,以控制公猪的污染。本研究旨在评价在体外和体内添加AC和BC对公猪粪臭的治疗效果。这是通过首先进行一项体外结合研究来比较AC, BC和废助滤剂(SFA)对公猪污染化合物的结合。体外研究结果表明,AC和BC对雄烯酮(AC: 97.2±0.4%,BC: 84.5±0.8%)和臭臭素(AC: 106.1±0.2%,BC: 113.2±0.7%)的Bmax均显著高于SFA对雄烯酮(50.5±0.2%)和臭臭素(97.1±5.3%)的Bmax。将AC和BC作为饲料添加剂添加到屠宰体重公猪的育肥猪饲粮中进行试验。这两种吸附剂都能成功地防止一部分动物(83%)的公猪污染,而对血浆硫酸雌酮或雄烯酮水平以及生长和性能参数没有影响。由此可见,BC是一种较好的替代AC的饲粮添加剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomolecules
Biomolecules Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.28 days
期刊介绍: Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on biogenic substances and their biological functions, structures, interactions with other molecules, and their microenvironment as well as biological systems. Biomolecules publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications.  Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信