Evaluation of Measurement Errors in Rotational Stitching, One-Shot, and Slot-Scanning Full-Length Radiography.

Abstract

Full-length radiography is essential for evaluating spinal deformities, limb length discrepancies, and preoperative planning in orthopedics, yet the measurement accuracy of different radiographic methods remains unclear. This phantom study compared the accuracy of rotational stitching, one-shot and slot-scanning full-length radiography across six radiographic systems in quantifying distances between anatomical landmarks. Measurement errors were statistically analyzed using appropriate nonparametric tests. The results demonstrated significant differences in measurement accuracy among the three methods (H (2) = 15.86, p < 0.001). Slot-scanning exhibited the highest accuracy, with a mean error of -1.19 ± 10.13 mm, while both rotational stitching and one-shot imaging showed greater systematic underestimation, with mean errors of -18.95 ± 13.77 mm and -15.32 ± 12.38 mm, respectively. These negative biases (approximately 1.9 cm and 1.5 cm) are clinically meaningful because, if unrecognized, they can alter mechanical axis estimation and alignment planning in procedures such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Post hoc analysis confirmed the superior accuracy of slot-scanning compared to the other two methods, while no significant difference was found between rotational stitching and one-shot imaging. These findings indicate that system choice substantially impacts measurement accuracy, supporting preferential use of slot-scanning when precise quantitative assessment is required.