Theresa Mittermair, Andrea Brunner, Bettina Zelger, Rohit Arora, Christian Wolfgang Huck, Johannes Dominikus Pallua
{"title":"Proof-of-Concept Study: Hyperspectral Imaging for Quantification of DKK-3 Expression in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.","authors":"Theresa Mittermair, Andrea Brunner, Bettina Zelger, Rohit Arora, Christian Wolfgang Huck, Johannes Dominikus Pallua","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide. This study investigated the suitability of visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging compared to visual assessment and conventional digital image analysis for quantifying immunohistochemical staining on the example of Dickkopf-3 (DKK-3) in OSCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of TMAs containing DKK-3 stained OSCC of 50 patients was retrieved from the archives at the Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck. TMAs were first evaluated visually, followed by digital image analysis using QuPath (version 0.3.2, open-source software). For hyperspectral imaging, six exemplary cases were selected (three cases with strong expression and three cases with weak expression) and evaluated. The collected hyperspectral images were visualised using TIVITA (Tissue Imaging System). The resulting true-colour images and the classified HSI images were then assessed using the QuPath software. The Allred score and the H-score were used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>97 tissue cores were used for visual and digital image analysis. No significant difference was found between the evaluations of visual and digital image analysis using the H-score (pWilcoxon = 0.278), and both H-scores correlated significantly with each other (p<sup>Spearman</sup> < 0.001). Similar results were also found using the Allred score. The kappa value was 0.67, which represents a \"substantial\" correlation. Finally, the H-scores and Allred scores were compared for visual, digital, and HSI imaging. No significant differences were found between the three groups concerning the H-score (pWilcoxon > 0.1). Using Cohen's Kappa, a \"fair\" to \"moderate\" correlation was observed between the three evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (VIS-NIR-HSI) is a promising complementary tool for digital pathology workflows. This proof-of-concept study suggests that HSI offers the potential for more objective quantification of DKK-3 expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, particularly in cases with weak staining. However, given the small sample size and exploratory design, the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Future studies with larger, clinically annotated cohorts and standardised workflows are needed before any consideration of routine clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide. This study investigated the suitability of visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging compared to visual assessment and conventional digital image analysis for quantifying immunohistochemical staining on the example of Dickkopf-3 (DKK-3) in OSCC.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of TMAs containing DKK-3 stained OSCC of 50 patients was retrieved from the archives at the Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck. TMAs were first evaluated visually, followed by digital image analysis using QuPath (version 0.3.2, open-source software). For hyperspectral imaging, six exemplary cases were selected (three cases with strong expression and three cases with weak expression) and evaluated. The collected hyperspectral images were visualised using TIVITA (Tissue Imaging System). The resulting true-colour images and the classified HSI images were then assessed using the QuPath software. The Allred score and the H-score were used for all analyses.
Results: 97 tissue cores were used for visual and digital image analysis. No significant difference was found between the evaluations of visual and digital image analysis using the H-score (pWilcoxon = 0.278), and both H-scores correlated significantly with each other (pSpearman < 0.001). Similar results were also found using the Allred score. The kappa value was 0.67, which represents a "substantial" correlation. Finally, the H-scores and Allred scores were compared for visual, digital, and HSI imaging. No significant differences were found between the three groups concerning the H-score (pWilcoxon > 0.1). Using Cohen's Kappa, a "fair" to "moderate" correlation was observed between the three evaluations.
Conclusion: Visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (VIS-NIR-HSI) is a promising complementary tool for digital pathology workflows. This proof-of-concept study suggests that HSI offers the potential for more objective quantification of DKK-3 expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, particularly in cases with weak staining. However, given the small sample size and exploratory design, the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Future studies with larger, clinically annotated cohorts and standardised workflows are needed before any consideration of routine clinical application.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering