DSOF: A Rapid Method to Determine the Abundance of Microalgae and Methanotrophic Bacteria in Coculture Using a Combination of Differential Sedimentation, Optical Density, and Fluorescence.
Carlos Cartin-Caballero, Christophe Collet, Daniel Gapes, Peter A Gostomski, Matthew B Stott, Carlo R Carere
{"title":"DSOF: A Rapid Method to Determine the Abundance of Microalgae and Methanotrophic Bacteria in Coculture Using a Combination of Differential Sedimentation, Optical Density, and Fluorescence.","authors":"Carlos Cartin-Caballero, Christophe Collet, Daniel Gapes, Peter A Gostomski, Matthew B Stott, Carlo R Carere","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12091000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cocultivation of microalgae and aerobic methanotrophs represents an emerging biotechnology platform to produce high-protein biomass, yet quantifying individual species in mixed cultures remains challenging. Here, we present a rapid, low-cost method-differential sedimentation, optical density, and fluorescence (DSOF)-to determine the abundance of coculture members. DSOF exploits differences in cell size and pigment autofluorescence between the thermoacidophilic microalga and methanotrophic species <i>Galdieria</i> sp. RTK37.1 and <i>Methylacidiphilum</i> sp. RTK17.1, respectively, to selectively sediment algal cells and estimate population contributions via OD<sub>600</sub> and phycocyanin fluorescence. Evaluation with model suspensions across a wide cell density range (0 ≤ [<i>Galdieria</i>]: ≤ 3.23 A.U., and 0 ≤ [<i>Methylacidiphilum</i>] ≤ 1.54 A.U.) showed strong agreement with known values, with most absolute errors < 0.1 A.U. and relative errors < 10% at moderate biomass levels. Application to live batch cocultures under microalga or methanotroph growth-suppressed conditions, and during simultaneous growth, demonstrated accurate tracking of population dynamics and revealed enhanced methanotroph growth in the presence of oxygenic microalgae. While DSOF accuracy decreases at very concentrated biomass (>2.0 A.U. for <i>Galdieria</i>) or under nitrogen-limiting conditions, the model provides a practical, scalable alternative to more complex, invasive or expensive techniques, enabling near real-time monitoring of microalgae-methanotroph cocultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12091000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cocultivation of microalgae and aerobic methanotrophs represents an emerging biotechnology platform to produce high-protein biomass, yet quantifying individual species in mixed cultures remains challenging. Here, we present a rapid, low-cost method-differential sedimentation, optical density, and fluorescence (DSOF)-to determine the abundance of coculture members. DSOF exploits differences in cell size and pigment autofluorescence between the thermoacidophilic microalga and methanotrophic species Galdieria sp. RTK37.1 and Methylacidiphilum sp. RTK17.1, respectively, to selectively sediment algal cells and estimate population contributions via OD600 and phycocyanin fluorescence. Evaluation with model suspensions across a wide cell density range (0 ≤ [Galdieria]: ≤ 3.23 A.U., and 0 ≤ [Methylacidiphilum] ≤ 1.54 A.U.) showed strong agreement with known values, with most absolute errors < 0.1 A.U. and relative errors < 10% at moderate biomass levels. Application to live batch cocultures under microalga or methanotroph growth-suppressed conditions, and during simultaneous growth, demonstrated accurate tracking of population dynamics and revealed enhanced methanotroph growth in the presence of oxygenic microalgae. While DSOF accuracy decreases at very concentrated biomass (>2.0 A.U. for Galdieria) or under nitrogen-limiting conditions, the model provides a practical, scalable alternative to more complex, invasive or expensive techniques, enabling near real-time monitoring of microalgae-methanotroph cocultures.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering