Time, Ideologies, and Care: Gendered Patterns of Parental Involvement in the UK and Portugal.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mariana Pinho, Inês Lourenço, Marisa Lousada
{"title":"Time, Ideologies, and Care: Gendered Patterns of Parental Involvement in the UK and Portugal.","authors":"Mariana Pinho, Inês Lourenço, Marisa Lousada","doi":"10.3390/bs15091204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines cross-national differences in parental involvement, work hours, and gender ideologies among parents in the UK and Portugal. Findings revealed that UK parents, particularly mothers, reported higher childcare involvement, while Portuguese parents worked more paid hours, reflecting fewer structural childcare constraints. Despite mothers in both countries endorsing more egalitarian gender ideologies than fathers, Portuguese parents overall held more egalitarian views and lower essentialist beliefs. Surprisingly, British fathers reported greater involvement in physical childcare than their Portuguese counterparts. Gender ideologies negatively predicted partner childcare hours, indicating compensatory dynamics, with significant mediation by work hours only in the UK. This suggests that egalitarian gender beliefs alone might be insufficient for achieving equality in family roles without corresponding sociopolitical frameworks to enable equitable practices. These results highlight the influence of national context and gender beliefs on family labour divisions and underscore the need for policies that support more equitable sharing of paid and unpaid responsibilities across both countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines cross-national differences in parental involvement, work hours, and gender ideologies among parents in the UK and Portugal. Findings revealed that UK parents, particularly mothers, reported higher childcare involvement, while Portuguese parents worked more paid hours, reflecting fewer structural childcare constraints. Despite mothers in both countries endorsing more egalitarian gender ideologies than fathers, Portuguese parents overall held more egalitarian views and lower essentialist beliefs. Surprisingly, British fathers reported greater involvement in physical childcare than their Portuguese counterparts. Gender ideologies negatively predicted partner childcare hours, indicating compensatory dynamics, with significant mediation by work hours only in the UK. This suggests that egalitarian gender beliefs alone might be insufficient for achieving equality in family roles without corresponding sociopolitical frameworks to enable equitable practices. These results highlight the influence of national context and gender beliefs on family labour divisions and underscore the need for policies that support more equitable sharing of paid and unpaid responsibilities across both countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

时间、意识形态和关怀:英国和葡萄牙父母参与的性别模式。
这项研究考察了英国和葡萄牙父母在父母参与、工作时间和性别意识形态方面的跨国差异。调查结果显示,英国父母,尤其是母亲,对儿童保育的投入更高,而葡萄牙父母的带薪工作时间更长,反映出结构性的儿童保育限制较少。尽管两国的母亲都比父亲更支持平等主义的性别意识形态,但葡萄牙父母总体上持更平等主义的观点,本质主义的信念更低。令人惊讶的是,与葡萄牙父亲相比,英国父亲在照顾孩子方面的参与度更高。性别意识形态负向预测伴侣照顾孩子的时间,表明补偿动态,只有在英国,工作时间有显著的中介作用。这表明,如果没有相应的社会政治框架来实现公平做法,仅凭平等主义的性别信念可能不足以实现家庭角色的平等。这些结果突出了国家背景和性别观念对家庭分工的影响,并强调需要制定政策,支持两国之间更公平地分担有偿和无偿责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信