University Students' Good Practices as Moderators Between Active Coping and Stress Responses.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cristina Ruiz-Camacho, Margarita Gozalo, Elena Felipe-Castaño
{"title":"University Students' Good Practices as Moderators Between Active Coping and Stress Responses.","authors":"Cristina Ruiz-Camacho, Margarita Gozalo, Elena Felipe-Castaño","doi":"10.3390/bs15091223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the framework of the European Higher Education Area, university students' good practices are considered key indicators of educational quality. In light of the high levels of academic stress reported in this population, the present study aims to examine whether four specific practices-feedback-seeking, cooperative work, time management, and active learning-moderate the relationship between active coping and stress responses. A cross-sectional design was employed with a sample of 1014 university students (<i>M</i> = 20.56; <i>SD</i> = 3.50). Participants completed the Academic Stress Coping Scale (A-CEA), the Academic Stress Response Scale (R-CEA), and the Inventory of Good Practices in University Students (IBPEU). Moderation analyses were conducted using linear regressions with interaction terms, and conditional effects (simple slopes) were estimated at low and high levels of the moderator. Significant moderation effects emerged. Feedback-seeking, cooperative work, and time management strengthened the inverse association between active coping and academic stress, with stronger reductions when these practices were reported at high levels. In contrast, active learning showed a threshold pattern: active coping reduced stress only when this practice was actively implemented, suggesting that its effective implementation may be necessary for coping to be effective. Promoting good practices may enhance the benefits of active coping. Their integration into early psychoeducational programs could bolster students' personal resources and reduce psychological distress in demanding academic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the framework of the European Higher Education Area, university students' good practices are considered key indicators of educational quality. In light of the high levels of academic stress reported in this population, the present study aims to examine whether four specific practices-feedback-seeking, cooperative work, time management, and active learning-moderate the relationship between active coping and stress responses. A cross-sectional design was employed with a sample of 1014 university students (M = 20.56; SD = 3.50). Participants completed the Academic Stress Coping Scale (A-CEA), the Academic Stress Response Scale (R-CEA), and the Inventory of Good Practices in University Students (IBPEU). Moderation analyses were conducted using linear regressions with interaction terms, and conditional effects (simple slopes) were estimated at low and high levels of the moderator. Significant moderation effects emerged. Feedback-seeking, cooperative work, and time management strengthened the inverse association between active coping and academic stress, with stronger reductions when these practices were reported at high levels. In contrast, active learning showed a threshold pattern: active coping reduced stress only when this practice was actively implemented, suggesting that its effective implementation may be necessary for coping to be effective. Promoting good practices may enhance the benefits of active coping. Their integration into early psychoeducational programs could bolster students' personal resources and reduce psychological distress in demanding academic settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大学生良好行为在积极应对与压力反应之间的调节作用。
在欧洲高等教育区框架内,大学生的良好实践被认为是教育质量的关键指标。鉴于该人群中报告的高水平学业压力,本研究旨在研究反馈寻求、合作工作、时间管理和主动学习四种具体实践是否调节主动应对与压力反应之间的关系。采用横断面设计,样本为1014名大学生(M = 20.56; SD = 3.50)。被试完成学业压力应对量表(A-CEA)、学业压力反应量表(R-CEA)和大学生良好实践量表(IBPEU)。使用具有相互作用项的线性回归进行调节分析,并在调节因子的低水平和高水平上估计条件效应(简单斜率)。出现了显著的调节效应。寻求反馈、合作工作和时间管理加强了积极应对与学业压力之间的负相关关系,当这些实践水平较高时,其降低程度更强。相比之下,主动学习表现出阈值模式:积极应对只有在积极实施的情况下才会减少压力,这表明积极应对的有效实施可能是有效应对的必要条件。推广良好做法可增强积极应对的益处。他们融入早期心理教育项目可以增强学生的个人资源,减少在高要求的学术环境中的心理困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信