Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Oscar Javier Valencia Blanco, Saray Fernández-Hernández, Hector de Llanos-Lanchares, Miquel Punset Fuste, José Angel Delgado García-Menocal, Javier Gil Mur, Aritza Brizuela Velasco
{"title":"Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.","authors":"Oscar Javier Valencia Blanco, Saray Fernández-Hernández, Hector de Llanos-Lanchares, Miquel Punset Fuste, José Angel Delgado García-Menocal, Javier Gil Mur, Aritza Brizuela Velasco","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this experimental in vitro study, both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of two self-curing dental composites were compared: Structur 3 (based on Bis-GMA) and Visco III (based on Bis-EMA), which are used for the direct fabrication of temporary dental prostheses. The properties evaluated included flexural strength, toughness, hydrophilicity (measured using the contact angle), density, microhardness, water absorption, and wear and scratch resistance. In terms of flexural strength, Structur 3 exhibited a higher value (127 ± 16 MPa) than Visco III (103 ± 25 MPa). In addition, the dental composite based on Bis-GMA showed a higher toughness (36.52 ± 9.20 mJ) compared to 16.55 ± 7.55 mJ for the dental composite based on Bis-EMA) and a greater displacement to fracture (2.50 ± 0.38 mm compared to 1.72 ± 0.38 mm). However, Visco III showed a higher microhardness (17.045 ± 0.93 HV0.5) compared to Structur 3 (8.10 ± 0.76 HV0.5) and a lower water absorption (11.2 ± 0.4 µg/mm<sup>3</sup> compared to Structur 3). In wear tests, Structur 3 showed greater wear (0.047 ± 0.021 mm<sup>2</sup> wear channel area) compared to Visco III (0.031 ± 0.013 mm<sup>2</sup>). Density analysis showed that Visco III is denser (1.5917 ± 0.006 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) than Structur 3 (1.324 ± 0.005 g/cm<sup>3</sup>). Fractography analysis showed that both dental composites exhibited brittle fractures. Contact angle tests revealed a similar hydrophilicity of both dental composites with values below 90°. These differences in properties may be influenced by the filler composition of the two dental composites, as Visco III contains macro-fillers with elements such as aluminum and barium, which increase radiopacity. The conclusion is that Visco III is preferable in terms of durability and resistance, while Structur 3 is more suitable for applications that require flexibility, such as in provisional prostheses with pontics or in situations that require high esthetic quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this experimental in vitro study, both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of two self-curing dental composites were compared: Structur 3 (based on Bis-GMA) and Visco III (based on Bis-EMA), which are used for the direct fabrication of temporary dental prostheses. The properties evaluated included flexural strength, toughness, hydrophilicity (measured using the contact angle), density, microhardness, water absorption, and wear and scratch resistance. In terms of flexural strength, Structur 3 exhibited a higher value (127 ± 16 MPa) than Visco III (103 ± 25 MPa). In addition, the dental composite based on Bis-GMA showed a higher toughness (36.52 ± 9.20 mJ) compared to 16.55 ± 7.55 mJ for the dental composite based on Bis-EMA) and a greater displacement to fracture (2.50 ± 0.38 mm compared to 1.72 ± 0.38 mm). However, Visco III showed a higher microhardness (17.045 ± 0.93 HV0.5) compared to Structur 3 (8.10 ± 0.76 HV0.5) and a lower water absorption (11.2 ± 0.4 µg/mm3 compared to Structur 3). In wear tests, Structur 3 showed greater wear (0.047 ± 0.021 mm2 wear channel area) compared to Visco III (0.031 ± 0.013 mm2). Density analysis showed that Visco III is denser (1.5917 ± 0.006 g/cm3) than Structur 3 (1.324 ± 0.005 g/cm3). Fractography analysis showed that both dental composites exhibited brittle fractures. Contact angle tests revealed a similar hydrophilicity of both dental composites with values below 90°. These differences in properties may be influenced by the filler composition of the two dental composites, as Visco III contains macro-fillers with elements such as aluminum and barium, which increase radiopacity. The conclusion is that Visco III is preferable in terms of durability and resistance, while Structur 3 is more suitable for applications that require flexibility, such as in provisional prostheses with pontics or in situations that require high esthetic quality.

两种用于直接临时修复体的自固化复合树脂的物理化学和力学特性。
在体外实验研究中,比较了两种自固化牙科复合材料的物理化学和力学性能:structure 3(基于Bis-GMA)和Visco III(基于Bis-EMA),这两种材料用于直接制作临时义齿。评估的性能包括抗弯强度、韧性、亲水性(使用接触角测量)、密度、显微硬度、吸水性、耐磨和抗划伤性。在抗弯强度方面,结构3(127±16 MPa)高于Visco III(103±25 MPa)。此外,Bis-GMA复合材料的韧性(36.52±9.20 mJ)高于Bis-EMA复合材料(16.55±7.55 mJ),断裂位移(2.50±0.38 mm)高于Bis-EMA复合材料(1.72±0.38 mm)。然而,Visco III的显微硬度(17.045±0.93 HV0.5)高于structor3(8.10±0.76 HV0.5),吸水率(11.2±0.4µg/mm3)低于structor3。在磨损试验中,结构3的磨损面积(0.047±0.021 mm2)大于Visco III的磨损面积(0.031±0.013 mm2)。密度分析表明,Visco III的密度(1.5917±0.006 g/cm3)高于structure 3(1.324±0.005 g/cm3)。断口分析表明,两种牙用复合材料均呈现脆性断裂。接触角测试表明,两种牙科复合材料在90°以下的亲水性相似。这些性能差异可能受到两种牙科复合材料的填料成分的影响,因为Visco III含有含有铝和钡等元素的宏填料,这会增加放射性不透明度。结论是,Visco III在耐用性和耐受性方面更可取,而structure 3更适合需要灵活性的应用,例如在带有支架的临时假体中或在需要高美学质量的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信