Further Validation Study of the Gender-Specific Binary Depression Screening Version (GIDS-15) and Investigation of Intervention Effects.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jan S Pellowski, Christian Wiessner, Claudia Buntrock, Hanna Christiansen
{"title":"Further Validation Study of the Gender-Specific Binary Depression Screening Version (GIDS-15) and Investigation of Intervention Effects.","authors":"Jan S Pellowski, Christian Wiessner, Claudia Buntrock, Hanna Christiansen","doi":"10.3390/bs15091253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Men and women differ in the manifestation of depression. At the same time, there is a lack of gender-sensitive depression questionnaires in Germany. This study investigated the Gender-specific binary depression screening version (GIDS-15) in a further validation step. In a two-armed, pragmatic single-blind randomised controlled clinical trial, we first investigated the psychometric properties and the sensitivity to change in the GIDS-15 in a sample with subclinical depression (<i>N</i> = 203). In addition, we then analysed sex differences between the intervention and waiting control group over time. We were able to demonstrate adequate to acceptable internal consistency as well as convergent construct validity of the GIDS-15. Additionally, we were able to demonstrate the sensitivity to change in the GIDS-15. Using a linear mixed model, we calculated a three-way interaction between intervention group, sex, and time (<i>p</i> = 0.017). We found an increase in the intervention effect for men over time. Conclusions: The GIDS-15 proves to be a solid and practical screening tool for the gender-sensitive assessment of depression in Germany. It can be used for progression and intervention diagnostics, although the intervention effect that was found can only be interpreted to a limited extent due to significant sample size differences between men and women. Limitations of our study and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Men and women differ in the manifestation of depression. At the same time, there is a lack of gender-sensitive depression questionnaires in Germany. This study investigated the Gender-specific binary depression screening version (GIDS-15) in a further validation step. In a two-armed, pragmatic single-blind randomised controlled clinical trial, we first investigated the psychometric properties and the sensitivity to change in the GIDS-15 in a sample with subclinical depression (N = 203). In addition, we then analysed sex differences between the intervention and waiting control group over time. We were able to demonstrate adequate to acceptable internal consistency as well as convergent construct validity of the GIDS-15. Additionally, we were able to demonstrate the sensitivity to change in the GIDS-15. Using a linear mixed model, we calculated a three-way interaction between intervention group, sex, and time (p = 0.017). We found an increase in the intervention effect for men over time. Conclusions: The GIDS-15 proves to be a solid and practical screening tool for the gender-sensitive assessment of depression in Germany. It can be used for progression and intervention diagnostics, although the intervention effect that was found can only be interpreted to a limited extent due to significant sample size differences between men and women. Limitations of our study and practical implications are discussed.

Abstract Image

性别二元抑郁筛查版(GIDS-15)的进一步验证研究及干预效果调查。
男性和女性在抑郁症的表现上有所不同。与此同时,德国缺乏对性别问题敏感的抑郁症问卷。本研究进一步验证了性别特异性二元抑郁症筛查版本(GIDS-15)。在一项双臂、实用的单盲随机对照临床试验中,我们首先研究了亚临床抑郁症患者(N = 203)的GIDS-15的心理测量特性和对变化的敏感性。此外,我们还分析了干预组和等待对照组之间的性别差异。我们能够证明足够的可接受的内部一致性以及收敛构造有效性的GIDS-15。此外,我们能够证明GIDS-15对变化的敏感性。使用线性混合模型,我们计算了干预组、性别和时间之间的三向交互作用(p = 0.017)。我们发现,随着时间的推移,男性的干预效果有所增加。结论:GIDS-15被证明是德国抑郁症性别敏感评估的坚实实用的筛查工具。它可以用于进展和干预诊断,尽管由于男性和女性之间的显着样本量差异,所发现的干预效果只能在有限程度上解释。讨论了本研究的局限性和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信