Sequencing Analysis Demonstrates That a Complex Genetic Architecture Contributes to Risk for Spina Bifida

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Madison Strain, Melanie E. Garrett, Max Bucklan, Joan M. Jasien, Gordon Worley, Joseph G. Gleeson, Allison E. Ashley-Koch
{"title":"Sequencing Analysis Demonstrates That a Complex Genetic Architecture Contributes to Risk for Spina Bifida","authors":"Madison Strain,&nbsp;Melanie E. Garrett,&nbsp;Max Bucklan,&nbsp;Joan M. Jasien,&nbsp;Gordon Worley,&nbsp;Joseph G. Gleeson,&nbsp;Allison E. Ashley-Koch","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Spina bifida (SB), a common neural tube defects (NTDs), has a complex genetic architecture that remains incompletely understood. Although prior studies have identified rare, deleterious single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in SB, broader contributions to risk remain unclear. Here, we investigated shared genetic risk among 256 SB probands compared with 395 ancestry-matched controls using an unbiased sequencing approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed an exome-wide association study (ExWAS) of 46,887 SNVs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) &gt; 0.001 to identify single-variant associations, followed by gene-based burden tests to assess the cumulative effect of SNVs within genes, using all variants and then restricting to rare variants (MAF &lt; 0.05). Both burden tests were repeated in 510 unaffected parents to evaluate excess mutational burden relative to controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all analyses, 16 genes were associated with SB: <i>SRCIN1</i>, <i>PDE4DIP</i>, <i>XCL2</i>, <i>CTAGE10P</i>, <i>GLB1L3</i>, <i>PMS2P4</i>, <i>HSPA4</i>, <i>GLB1L2</i>, <i>FAM90A1</i>, <i>PLA1A</i>, <i>HLA-A</i>, <i>SPIRE2</i>, <i>TVP23B</i>, <i>CHD5</i>, <i>FOXA2</i>, and <i>PIF1</i>. ExWAS identified 11 significant SNVs, nine of which were common (MAF &gt; 0.05). The unrestricted burden test identified seven genes; four remained significant when restricted to rare variants, and two additional genes emerged only in that subset. Five burden-associated genes were not detected in the ExWAS, suggesting cumulative variant effects. Four burden-associated genes also showed enrichment in parents, supporting inherited risk. Three of these showed suggestive transmission disequilibrium (<i>p</i> values ≤ 0.10) and one was attributed to multiple SNVs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results provide new insight into the multifactorial genetic landscape of SB and highlight the importance of unbiased approaches in constructing genetic models of NTD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spina bifida (SB), a common neural tube defects (NTDs), has a complex genetic architecture that remains incompletely understood. Although prior studies have identified rare, deleterious single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in SB, broader contributions to risk remain unclear. Here, we investigated shared genetic risk among 256 SB probands compared with 395 ancestry-matched controls using an unbiased sequencing approach.

Methods

We performed an exome-wide association study (ExWAS) of 46,887 SNVs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) > 0.001 to identify single-variant associations, followed by gene-based burden tests to assess the cumulative effect of SNVs within genes, using all variants and then restricting to rare variants (MAF < 0.05). Both burden tests were repeated in 510 unaffected parents to evaluate excess mutational burden relative to controls.

Results

Across all analyses, 16 genes were associated with SB: SRCIN1, PDE4DIP, XCL2, CTAGE10P, GLB1L3, PMS2P4, HSPA4, GLB1L2, FAM90A1, PLA1A, HLA-A, SPIRE2, TVP23B, CHD5, FOXA2, and PIF1. ExWAS identified 11 significant SNVs, nine of which were common (MAF > 0.05). The unrestricted burden test identified seven genes; four remained significant when restricted to rare variants, and two additional genes emerged only in that subset. Five burden-associated genes were not detected in the ExWAS, suggesting cumulative variant effects. Four burden-associated genes also showed enrichment in parents, supporting inherited risk. Three of these showed suggestive transmission disequilibrium (p values ≤ 0.10) and one was attributed to multiple SNVs.

Conclusion

These results provide new insight into the multifactorial genetic landscape of SB and highlight the importance of unbiased approaches in constructing genetic models of NTD.

Abstract Image

测序分析表明,复杂的遗传结构增加了脊柱裂的风险
背景脊柱裂(Spina bifida, SB)是一种常见的神经管缺陷(NTDs),其复杂的遗传结构尚未完全了解。尽管先前的研究已经在SB中发现了罕见的、有害的单核苷酸变异(snv),但对风险的更广泛贡献仍不清楚。在这里,我们使用无偏测序方法研究了256个SB先显子与395个祖先匹配对照的共同遗传风险。方法:我们对46,887个小等位基因频率(MAF) >; 0.001的snv进行了外显子组全关联研究(ExWAS),以确定单变异关联,然后进行基于基因的负担试验,评估基因内snv的累积效应,使用所有变异,然后限制为罕见变异(MAF < 0.05)。在510名未受影响的父母中重复这两项负担测试,以评估相对于对照组的额外突变负担。结果在所有分析中,16个基因与SB相关:SRCIN1、PDE4DIP、XCL2、CTAGE10P、GLB1L3、PMS2P4、HSPA4、GLB1L2、FAM90A1、PLA1A、HLA-A、SPIRE2、TVP23B、CHD5、FOXA2和PIF1。ExWAS鉴定出11个显著snv,其中9个为常见snv (MAF > 0.05)。无限制负荷试验鉴定出7个基因;当局限于罕见的变异时,有四个基因仍然很重要,另外两个基因只在这个子集中出现。ExWAS中未检测到5个负荷相关基因,提示累积变异效应。四种与负担相关的基因在父母身上也表现出富集,支持遗传风险。其中3例显示传导性不平衡(p值≤0.10),1例归因于多个snv。结论本研究结果为认识SB的多因子遗传格局提供了新的视角,并强调了建立NTD遗传模型的无偏倚方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth Defects Research
Birth Defects Research Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks. Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信