Perspectives on Well-being of Older Adults and Young People in Taiwan- A Q-Methodology Study

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Hua-I Hsu, Chih-Chi Liu, Chun-Yu Kuo, Job van Exel, Hsueh-Chih Chen, Stephanie Fu Yang
{"title":"Perspectives on Well-being of Older Adults and Young People in Taiwan- A Q-Methodology Study","authors":"Hua-I Hsu,&nbsp;Chih-Chi Liu,&nbsp;Chun-Yu Kuo,&nbsp;Job van Exel,&nbsp;Hsueh-Chih Chen,&nbsp;Stephanie Fu Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11482-024-10410-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Well-being has been described as a multifaceted concept that is not easy to summarize in a single measure, especially across different generations. Questions remain regarding the factors constituting well-being across generations and whether these factors are weighed differently. This study explores these generational discrepancies in well-being perceptions using Q-methodology. Participants (<i>N</i> = 176) in Taiwan, categorized as older adults (53) and young adults (123), ranked statements representing various well-being factors. Analysis identified five distinct viewpoints across both generations, which were (1) physical health and spiritual harmony, (2) interpersonal relationships, sufficient income, and health (3) personal health, financial stability, inner peace, and goals (4) fulfillment and life satisfaction, and (5) personal achievement-centric well-being, signifying the multifaceted nature of well-being priorities across age groups. Notably, older adults showed a strong consensus on viewpoints emphasizing physical well-being and social connections, while younger adults placed greater weight on a broader range of well-being factors including financial security, inner peace, and goal achievement. Cultural influences were also evident in the rankings. These findings highlight the need for well-being measures and policies that cater to the diverse needs of different generations. Future research should explore the prevalence of these viewpoints, their connection to individual characteristics, and how they evolve over time and in different socio-economic contexts, potentially reflecting changing societal values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"20 2","pages":"483 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-024-10410-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well-being has been described as a multifaceted concept that is not easy to summarize in a single measure, especially across different generations. Questions remain regarding the factors constituting well-being across generations and whether these factors are weighed differently. This study explores these generational discrepancies in well-being perceptions using Q-methodology. Participants (N = 176) in Taiwan, categorized as older adults (53) and young adults (123), ranked statements representing various well-being factors. Analysis identified five distinct viewpoints across both generations, which were (1) physical health and spiritual harmony, (2) interpersonal relationships, sufficient income, and health (3) personal health, financial stability, inner peace, and goals (4) fulfillment and life satisfaction, and (5) personal achievement-centric well-being, signifying the multifaceted nature of well-being priorities across age groups. Notably, older adults showed a strong consensus on viewpoints emphasizing physical well-being and social connections, while younger adults placed greater weight on a broader range of well-being factors including financial security, inner peace, and goal achievement. Cultural influences were also evident in the rankings. These findings highlight the need for well-being measures and policies that cater to the diverse needs of different generations. Future research should explore the prevalence of these viewpoints, their connection to individual characteristics, and how they evolve over time and in different socio-economic contexts, potentially reflecting changing societal values.

Abstract Image

台湾老年人与年轻人幸福感之透视——q -方法学研究
幸福被描述为一个多方面的概念,不容易用单一的衡量标准来总结,尤其是在不同的世代之间。关于构成几代人幸福的因素,以及这些因素是否被不同地衡量,问题仍然存在。本研究使用q -方法论探讨了这些幸福感感知的代际差异。台湾的参与者(N = 176),分为老年人(53)和年轻人(123),对代表各种幸福因素的陈述进行排名。分析发现,两代人对幸福的关注有5个不同的观点,分别是(1)身体健康和精神和谐;(2)人际关系、充足的收入和健康;(3)个人健康、财务稳定、内心平静和目标;(4)成就感和生活满意度;(5)以个人成就为中心的幸福。这表明,不同年龄段的人对幸福的关注是多方面的。值得注意的是,老年人在强调身体健康和社会关系的观点上表现出强烈的共识,而年轻人则更重视更广泛的幸福因素,包括经济安全、内心平静和目标实现。文化的影响在排名中也很明显。这些发现突出表明,有必要制定福利措施和政策,以满足不同世代的不同需求。未来的研究应该探索这些观点的普遍性,它们与个体特征的联系,以及它们如何随着时间和不同的社会经济背景而演变,从而潜在地反映不断变化的社会价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信