{"title":"Assessing Matrix Effects in LC–MS/MS Analysis of Pesticides in Food Using Diluted QuEChERS Extracts","authors":"Abderrahim Eddahby, Abdelkarim Chahine, Lahcen Hssaini","doi":"10.1007/s12161-025-02786-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Matrix effects (MEs) in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis of pesticide residues pose significant challenges due to signal suppression or enhancement caused by co-extracted matrix components. This study evaluates the efficacy of a 10-fold dilution strategy to mitigate MEs for 90 pesticides across 10 food matrices (tomato, bean, zucchini, potato, dates, carrot, cucumber, fennel, mint, apple). Extracts were prepared using a modified QuEChERS protocol, diluted, and analyzed via UPLC-ESI–MS/MS. MEs were quantified by comparing slopes of matrix-matched and solvent-based calibration curves. Results demonstrated that dilution significantly reduced MEs in most matrices: 97% of pesticides in tomato, 92% in zucchini, and 93% in potato exhibited acceptable ME values (± 20%). However, efficacy varied with matrix composition and pesticide properties. Hydrophilic pesticides (e.g., acephate, logP = − 0.85) showed suppression in carbohydrate-rich matrices (e.g., dates, − 14% ME), while lipophilic compounds (e.g., chlorpyrifos, logP = 4.7) displayed enhancement in lipid-dense matrices (e.g., apple, + 48.4% ME). Persistent MEs occurred in 25–27% of cases, such as fenamidone in carrot (− 15% ME) and fenpropathrin in fennel (+ 63% ME), necessitating matrix- and analyte-specific interventions. While dilution proved effective for more than 90% of cases, outliers necessitate advanced methods like isotope-labeled standards. This work validates dilution as a cost-effective strategy for routine pesticide analysis, balancing sensitivity with regulatory compliance in food.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 7","pages":"1203 - 1212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02786-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Matrix effects (MEs) in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis of pesticide residues pose significant challenges due to signal suppression or enhancement caused by co-extracted matrix components. This study evaluates the efficacy of a 10-fold dilution strategy to mitigate MEs for 90 pesticides across 10 food matrices (tomato, bean, zucchini, potato, dates, carrot, cucumber, fennel, mint, apple). Extracts were prepared using a modified QuEChERS protocol, diluted, and analyzed via UPLC-ESI–MS/MS. MEs were quantified by comparing slopes of matrix-matched and solvent-based calibration curves. Results demonstrated that dilution significantly reduced MEs in most matrices: 97% of pesticides in tomato, 92% in zucchini, and 93% in potato exhibited acceptable ME values (± 20%). However, efficacy varied with matrix composition and pesticide properties. Hydrophilic pesticides (e.g., acephate, logP = − 0.85) showed suppression in carbohydrate-rich matrices (e.g., dates, − 14% ME), while lipophilic compounds (e.g., chlorpyrifos, logP = 4.7) displayed enhancement in lipid-dense matrices (e.g., apple, + 48.4% ME). Persistent MEs occurred in 25–27% of cases, such as fenamidone in carrot (− 15% ME) and fenpropathrin in fennel (+ 63% ME), necessitating matrix- and analyte-specific interventions. While dilution proved effective for more than 90% of cases, outliers necessitate advanced methods like isotope-labeled standards. This work validates dilution as a cost-effective strategy for routine pesticide analysis, balancing sensitivity with regulatory compliance in food.
期刊介绍:
Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.