Are Children's Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports of Health Utility Agreed? A School-Based Study in China using the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Yan Li, Yanqiu Chen, Jize Sun, Mingyu Jiang, Aixia Ma, Xuejing Jin, Pingyu Chen
{"title":"Are Children's Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports of Health Utility Agreed? A School-Based Study in China using the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D","authors":"Yan Li,&nbsp;Yanqiu Chen,&nbsp;Jize Sun,&nbsp;Mingyu Jiang,&nbsp;Aixia Ma,&nbsp;Xuejing Jin,&nbsp;Pingyu Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11482-025-10463-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objective: This study investigated a general Chinese child population aged 7–8 years with the EuroQol 5-Dimension Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and Child Health Utility 9D (CHU-9D) instruments, aiming to examine the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports across various dimensions and overall health utility values, as well as to explore potential factors that may affect the agreement and utility values. Methods: Data were collected from second-grade students aged 7–8 in four schools in Guangxi and Guizhou provinces, China. Children and their proxies independently completed their respective versions of the questionnaires, including the EQ-5D-Y, the CHU-9D, and other socio-demographic information. The agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports in various dimensions was assessed using agreement rate and Adjusted Consistency (AC) value. Bland–Altman (BA) plots and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were utilized to analyze the agreement of utility values. Subgroup analyses of ICC and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to explore factors influencing the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports. Results: A total of 369 pairs of valid questionnaires were collected from both children and proxies. The AC values for various dimensions showed good agreement between children and proxies for physical function dimensions, but poorer agreement for subjective social and psychological function dimensions. BA plots revealed significant overestimation of children's utility values by both EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D proxy-reports compared to self-reports. The ICC values for self-reported and proxy-reported utilities were 0.130 for the EQ-5D-Y and 0.295 for the CHU-9D. Subgroup analysis revealed that mothers had higher ICC values and better agreement with children compared to fathers. Moreover, children's health conditions, parental marital status, and family's highest education level impacted agreement results. Conclusions: For the general child population aged 7–8 years in China, the agreement between self-reported and proxy-reported utilities is weak, particularly in subjective social and psychological dimensions, with proxy-reports significantly overestimating children's utility values compared to self-reports. Self-reports and proxy-reports of health utility should be considered complementary rather than interchangeable. The findings provide valuable insights and references for the development of guidelines for self-reports and proxy-reports of children's utility instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"20 3","pages":"1221 - 1241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-025-10463-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated a general Chinese child population aged 7–8 years with the EuroQol 5-Dimension Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and Child Health Utility 9D (CHU-9D) instruments, aiming to examine the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports across various dimensions and overall health utility values, as well as to explore potential factors that may affect the agreement and utility values. Methods: Data were collected from second-grade students aged 7–8 in four schools in Guangxi and Guizhou provinces, China. Children and their proxies independently completed their respective versions of the questionnaires, including the EQ-5D-Y, the CHU-9D, and other socio-demographic information. The agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports in various dimensions was assessed using agreement rate and Adjusted Consistency (AC) value. Bland–Altman (BA) plots and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were utilized to analyze the agreement of utility values. Subgroup analyses of ICC and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to explore factors influencing the agreement between self-reports and proxy-reports. Results: A total of 369 pairs of valid questionnaires were collected from both children and proxies. The AC values for various dimensions showed good agreement between children and proxies for physical function dimensions, but poorer agreement for subjective social and psychological function dimensions. BA plots revealed significant overestimation of children's utility values by both EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D proxy-reports compared to self-reports. The ICC values for self-reported and proxy-reported utilities were 0.130 for the EQ-5D-Y and 0.295 for the CHU-9D. Subgroup analysis revealed that mothers had higher ICC values and better agreement with children compared to fathers. Moreover, children's health conditions, parental marital status, and family's highest education level impacted agreement results. Conclusions: For the general child population aged 7–8 years in China, the agreement between self-reported and proxy-reported utilities is weak, particularly in subjective social and psychological dimensions, with proxy-reports significantly overestimating children's utility values compared to self-reports. Self-reports and proxy-reports of health utility should be considered complementary rather than interchangeable. The findings provide valuable insights and references for the development of guidelines for self-reports and proxy-reports of children's utility instruments.

儿童的自我报告和卫生事业代理报告是否一致?基于EQ-5D-Y和CHU-9D的中国校本研究
目的:本研究采用EuroQol 5维青少年版(EQ-5D-Y)和儿童健康效用9D (CHU-9D)量表对中国7-8岁的普通儿童进行调查,旨在检验自我报告与代理报告在各维度和整体健康效用值之间的一致性,并探讨影响一致性和效用值的潜在因素。方法:以广西、贵州四所学校7 ~ 8岁二年级学生为调查对象。儿童及其代理人独立完成了各自版本的调查问卷,包括EQ-5D-Y、CHU-9D和其他社会人口统计信息。采用协议率和调整一致性(AC)值评估自我报告与代理报告在各维度上的一致性。使用Bland-Altman (BA)图和类内相关系数(ICC)分析效用值的一致性。采用ICC亚组分析和多元线性回归分析探讨影响自我报告与代理报告一致性的因素。结果:共收集有效问卷369对。各维度的AC值与生理功能维度一致,但与主观社会功能和心理功能维度的一致性较差。BA图显示,与自我报告相比,EQ-5D-Y和CHU-9D代理报告都显著高估了儿童的效用值。EQ-5D-Y的自我报告和代理报告效用的ICC值为0.130,CHU-9D为0.295。亚组分析显示,与父亲相比,母亲的ICC值更高,与孩子的一致性更好。此外,儿童的健康状况、父母的婚姻状况和家庭的最高受教育程度影响了协议结果。结论:在中国7-8岁的儿童群体中,自我报告和代理报告的效用值一致性较弱,特别是在主观社会和心理维度上,代理报告显著高估了儿童的效用值。健康效用的自我报告和代理报告应被认为是互补的,而不是可互换的。研究结果为制定儿童实用工具自我报告和代理报告指南提供了宝贵的见解和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信