Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete: a RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Viktor Mechtcherine, Shravan Muthukrishnan, Annika Robens-Radermacher, Rob Wolfs, Jelle Versteege, Costantino Menna, Onur Ozturk, Nilufer Ozyurt, Josef Roupec, Christiane Richter, Jörg Jungwirth, Luiza Miranda, Rebecca Ammann, Jean-François Caron, Victor de Bono, Renate Monte, Iván Navarrete, Claudia Eugenin, Hélène Lombois-Burger, Bilal Baz, Maris Sinka, Alise Sapata, Ilhame Harbouz, Yamei Zhang, Zijian Jia, Jacques Kruger, Jean-Pierre Mostert, Mateja Štefančič, Lucija Hanžič, Abdelhak Kaci, Said Rahal, Manu Santhanam, Shantanu Bhattacherjee, Chalermwut Snguanyat, Arun Arunothayan, Zengfeng Zhao, Inka Mai, Inken Jette Rasehorn, David Böhler, Niklas Freund, Dirk Lowke, Tobias Neef, Markus Taubert, Daniel Auer, C. Maximilian Hechtl, Maximilian Dahlenburg, Laura Esposito, Richard Buswell, John Kolawole, Muhammad Nura Isa, Xingzi Liu, Zhendi Wang, Kolluru Subramaniam, Freek Bos
{"title":"Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete: a RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity","authors":"Viktor Mechtcherine,&nbsp;Shravan Muthukrishnan,&nbsp;Annika Robens-Radermacher,&nbsp;Rob Wolfs,&nbsp;Jelle Versteege,&nbsp;Costantino Menna,&nbsp;Onur Ozturk,&nbsp;Nilufer Ozyurt,&nbsp;Josef Roupec,&nbsp;Christiane Richter,&nbsp;Jörg Jungwirth,&nbsp;Luiza Miranda,&nbsp;Rebecca Ammann,&nbsp;Jean-François Caron,&nbsp;Victor de Bono,&nbsp;Renate Monte,&nbsp;Iván Navarrete,&nbsp;Claudia Eugenin,&nbsp;Hélène Lombois-Burger,&nbsp;Bilal Baz,&nbsp;Maris Sinka,&nbsp;Alise Sapata,&nbsp;Ilhame Harbouz,&nbsp;Yamei Zhang,&nbsp;Zijian Jia,&nbsp;Jacques Kruger,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Mostert,&nbsp;Mateja Štefančič,&nbsp;Lucija Hanžič,&nbsp;Abdelhak Kaci,&nbsp;Said Rahal,&nbsp;Manu Santhanam,&nbsp;Shantanu Bhattacherjee,&nbsp;Chalermwut Snguanyat,&nbsp;Arun Arunothayan,&nbsp;Zengfeng Zhao,&nbsp;Inka Mai,&nbsp;Inken Jette Rasehorn,&nbsp;David Böhler,&nbsp;Niklas Freund,&nbsp;Dirk Lowke,&nbsp;Tobias Neef,&nbsp;Markus Taubert,&nbsp;Daniel Auer,&nbsp;C. Maximilian Hechtl,&nbsp;Maximilian Dahlenburg,&nbsp;Laura Esposito,&nbsp;Richard Buswell,&nbsp;John Kolawole,&nbsp;Muhammad Nura Isa,&nbsp;Xingzi Liu,&nbsp;Zhendi Wang,&nbsp;Kolluru Subramaniam,&nbsp;Freek Bos","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditional construction techniques, such as in-situ casting and pre-cast concrete methods, have well-established testing protocols for assessing compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, including specific procedures for sample preparation and curing. In contrast, 3D concrete printing currently lacks standardized testing protocols, potentially contributing to the inconsistent results reported in previous studies. To address this issue, RILEM TC 304-ADC initiated a comprehensive interlaboratory study on the mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete. This study involves 30 laboratories worldwide, contributing 34 sets of data, with some laboratories testing more than one mix design. The compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were determined under three distinct conditions: Default, where each laboratory printed according to their standard procedure followed by water bath curing; Deviation 1, which involved creating a cold joint by increasing the time interval between printing layers; and Deviation 2, where the standard printing process was used, but the specimens were cured under conditions different from water bath. Some tests were conducted at two different scales based on specimen size—“mortar-scale” and “concrete-scale”—to investigate the size effect on compressive strength. Since the mix design remained identical for both scales, the only variable was the specimen size. This paper reports on the findings from the interlaboratory study, followed by a detailed investigation into the influencing parameters such as extraction location, cold joints, number of interlayers, and curing conditions on the mechanical properties of the printed concrete. As this study includes results from laboratories worldwide, its contribution to the development of relevant standardized testing protocols is critical. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional construction techniques, such as in-situ casting and pre-cast concrete methods, have well-established testing protocols for assessing compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, including specific procedures for sample preparation and curing. In contrast, 3D concrete printing currently lacks standardized testing protocols, potentially contributing to the inconsistent results reported in previous studies. To address this issue, RILEM TC 304-ADC initiated a comprehensive interlaboratory study on the mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete. This study involves 30 laboratories worldwide, contributing 34 sets of data, with some laboratories testing more than one mix design. The compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were determined under three distinct conditions: Default, where each laboratory printed according to their standard procedure followed by water bath curing; Deviation 1, which involved creating a cold joint by increasing the time interval between printing layers; and Deviation 2, where the standard printing process was used, but the specimens were cured under conditions different from water bath. Some tests were conducted at two different scales based on specimen size—“mortar-scale” and “concrete-scale”—to investigate the size effect on compressive strength. Since the mix design remained identical for both scales, the only variable was the specimen size. This paper reports on the findings from the interlaboratory study, followed by a detailed investigation into the influencing parameters such as extraction location, cold joints, number of interlayers, and curing conditions on the mechanical properties of the printed concrete. As this study includes results from laboratories worldwide, its contribution to the development of relevant standardized testing protocols is critical.

3D打印混凝土的机械性能:一项RILEM 304-ADC实验室间研究——抗压强度和弹性模量
传统的施工技术,如原位浇筑和预制混凝土方法,都有完善的测试协议来评估抗压强度和弹性模量,包括样品制备和养护的具体程序。相比之下,3D混凝土打印目前缺乏标准化的测试方案,这可能导致先前研究报告的结果不一致。为了解决这个问题,RILEM TC 304-ADC对3D打印混凝土的力学性能进行了全面的实验室间研究。本研究涉及全球30个实验室,提供34组数据,其中一些实验室测试了不止一种混合设计。抗压强度和弹性模量是在三种不同的条件下确定的:默认情况下,每个实验室根据各自的标准程序进行印刷,然后进行水浴固化;偏差1,通过增加打印层之间的时间间隔来创建冷接头;偏差2,使用标准印刷工艺,但样品在不同于水浴的条件下固化。在“砂浆尺度”和“混凝土尺度”两种不同尺度下进行了一些试验,以研究尺寸对抗压强度的影响。由于混合设计对两种尺度保持相同,唯一的变量是试样尺寸。本文报告了实验室间研究的结果,然后详细研究了提取位置、冷接缝、夹层数量和养护条件等参数对打印混凝土力学性能的影响。由于这项研究包括来自世界各地实验室的结果,因此它对制定相关标准化测试方案的贡献至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信