TFCP system: a novel framework for evaluating the effectiveness of skin wound treatment

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Bo-Wen Zheng, Chao Lian, Yong-Hong Qin, Jian-Xiong Qiao, Lin Zhong, Jin Zhang, Ying-Jun Su, Xuan-Fen Zhang
{"title":"TFCP system: a novel framework for evaluating the effectiveness of skin wound treatment","authors":"Bo-Wen Zheng,&nbsp;Chao Lian,&nbsp;Yong-Hong Qin,&nbsp;Jian-Xiong Qiao,&nbsp;Lin Zhong,&nbsp;Jin Zhang,&nbsp;Ying-Jun Su,&nbsp;Xuan-Fen Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04388-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acute and chronic skin wounds, including defects and ulcers, represent a prevalent clinical challenge in increasing morbidity. With advancements in treatment technologies such as skin wound care and surgical repair, treatment effectiveness has constantly shown improvement. However, assessments of treatment efficacy have typically relied on measures involving primary or secondary healing and subsequent basic functional evaluations. Unfortunately, the degree of cosmetic improvement and the level of pain during diagnosis and treatment have often been overlooked. So, the current assessment methods and results are far from meeting the assessment needs of the injured in terms of self-care, work ability, and confidence recovery. Consequently, some wounds that should be promptly repaired do not receive timely or optimal treatment, resulting in prolonged total treatment times, painful treatment experiences, residual scarring, or functional and aesthetic impacts from remaining scars or skin grafts (flaps). To address these issues, we propose a new therapeutic effect evaluation system (TFCP system), which encompass treatment duration (T), functional recovery (F) (complete, significant, basic, none), cosmetic outcome (C) (regenerative rejuvenation repair, rejuvenation repair, cosmetic repair, disfiguration), and pain level (P) (none, mild, moderate, severe). The TFCP system can be used to predict and ultimately evaluate the therapeutic effects of various skin wounds, thereby promoting the adoption of concepts and technologies related to cosmetic repair and comfortable diagnosis and treatment. Ultimately, this will help improve the effectiveness of skin wound treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04388-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute and chronic skin wounds, including defects and ulcers, represent a prevalent clinical challenge in increasing morbidity. With advancements in treatment technologies such as skin wound care and surgical repair, treatment effectiveness has constantly shown improvement. However, assessments of treatment efficacy have typically relied on measures involving primary or secondary healing and subsequent basic functional evaluations. Unfortunately, the degree of cosmetic improvement and the level of pain during diagnosis and treatment have often been overlooked. So, the current assessment methods and results are far from meeting the assessment needs of the injured in terms of self-care, work ability, and confidence recovery. Consequently, some wounds that should be promptly repaired do not receive timely or optimal treatment, resulting in prolonged total treatment times, painful treatment experiences, residual scarring, or functional and aesthetic impacts from remaining scars or skin grafts (flaps). To address these issues, we propose a new therapeutic effect evaluation system (TFCP system), which encompass treatment duration (T), functional recovery (F) (complete, significant, basic, none), cosmetic outcome (C) (regenerative rejuvenation repair, rejuvenation repair, cosmetic repair, disfiguration), and pain level (P) (none, mild, moderate, severe). The TFCP system can be used to predict and ultimately evaluate the therapeutic effects of various skin wounds, thereby promoting the adoption of concepts and technologies related to cosmetic repair and comfortable diagnosis and treatment. Ultimately, this will help improve the effectiveness of skin wound treatment.

TFCP系统:评估皮肤创面治疗效果的新框架
急性和慢性皮肤伤口,包括缺陷和溃疡,是发病率不断上升的一个普遍的临床挑战。随着皮肤创面护理、手术修复等治疗技术的进步,治疗效果不断提高。然而,治疗效果的评估通常依赖于包括原发性或继发性愈合和随后的基本功能评估的措施。不幸的是,在诊断和治疗过程中,美容改善的程度和疼痛程度经常被忽视。因此,目前的评估方法和结果在自我护理、工作能力、信心恢复等方面还远远不能满足伤者的评估需求。因此,一些应该及时修复的伤口没有得到及时或最佳的治疗,导致总治疗时间延长,痛苦的治疗经历,残留疤痕,或残留疤痕或皮肤移植(皮瓣)对功能和美学的影响。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一个新的治疗效果评估系统(TFCP系统),包括治疗时间(T)、功能恢复(F)(完全、显著、基本、无)、美容结果(C)(再生年轻化修复、年轻化修复、美容修复、毁容)和疼痛程度(P)(无、轻度、中度、重度)。TFCP系统可用于预测和最终评估各种皮肤创面的治疗效果,从而促进美容修复和舒适诊疗相关概念和技术的采用。最终,这将有助于提高皮肤伤口治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信