Approaches to enhancing grain yield and carbon neutrality with organic and inorganic fertilizer practice in Chinese paddy fields

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiafei Li, Zhenglan Peng, Tao Liu, Bo Cheng, Xinrui Li, William D. Batchelor, Zongkui Chen
{"title":"Approaches to enhancing grain yield and carbon neutrality with organic and inorganic fertilizer practice in Chinese paddy fields","authors":"Xiafei Li,&nbsp;Zhenglan Peng,&nbsp;Tao Liu,&nbsp;Bo Cheng,&nbsp;Xinrui Li,&nbsp;William D. Batchelor,&nbsp;Zongkui Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12571-025-01548-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Achieving both high yield and carbon (C) neutrality, which is critical for food security while pursuing the goal of C neutrality, is often conflicting, particularly with organic fertilizer practices in Chinese paddy fields. Resolving this conflict requires further research and practical changes, as current studies remain fragmented. Therefore, this study used the Denitrification-Decomposition model to evaluate the potential of inorganic and organic fertilizers practices for improving both C neutrality and grain yields in Chinese paddy fields. The findings showed that in chemical nitrogen (N) treatments, grain yield and C neutrality ranged from 6.36–9.48 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and 3.49–13.42 t C ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Specifically, when chemical N was applied at 150–250 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, higher plant C sequestration was observed, leading to increased yield and C neutrality. When chemical N was combined with green manure, straw incorporation, or manure fertilizer, grain yield improved by about 7%, while C neutrality decreased by 20%. To further enhance yield and C neutrality, it is imperative to increase plant C sequestration by 1.0 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> and reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 0.22 t CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>−1</sup> in chemical N applications of 150–200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> combined with green manure. Additionally, achieving higher C neutrality with chemical N applications of 200–250 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> combined with straw incorporation or manure fertilizer requested enhancing plant C sequestration by 1.2 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> or reducing the global warming potential. In conclusions, combining chemical N at 150–200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> with green manure offers a promising approach to achieving both higher grain yield and C neutrality. However, efforts to further reduce carbon emissions are still essential for enhancing C neutrality. The study provides valuable insights for advancing food security while pursuing the goal of C neutrality in Chinese rice fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"17 4","pages":"1053 - 1070"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-025-01548-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving both high yield and carbon (C) neutrality, which is critical for food security while pursuing the goal of C neutrality, is often conflicting, particularly with organic fertilizer practices in Chinese paddy fields. Resolving this conflict requires further research and practical changes, as current studies remain fragmented. Therefore, this study used the Denitrification-Decomposition model to evaluate the potential of inorganic and organic fertilizers practices for improving both C neutrality and grain yields in Chinese paddy fields. The findings showed that in chemical nitrogen (N) treatments, grain yield and C neutrality ranged from 6.36–9.48 t ha−1 and 3.49–13.42 t C ha−1, respectively. Specifically, when chemical N was applied at 150–250 kg N ha−1, higher plant C sequestration was observed, leading to increased yield and C neutrality. When chemical N was combined with green manure, straw incorporation, or manure fertilizer, grain yield improved by about 7%, while C neutrality decreased by 20%. To further enhance yield and C neutrality, it is imperative to increase plant C sequestration by 1.0 t C ha−1 and reduce N2O emission by 0.22 t CO2-eq ha−1 in chemical N applications of 150–200 kg N ha−1 combined with green manure. Additionally, achieving higher C neutrality with chemical N applications of 200–250 kg N ha−1 combined with straw incorporation or manure fertilizer requested enhancing plant C sequestration by 1.2 t C ha−1 or reducing the global warming potential. In conclusions, combining chemical N at 150–200 kg N ha−1 with green manure offers a promising approach to achieving both higher grain yield and C neutrality. However, efforts to further reduce carbon emissions are still essential for enhancing C neutrality. The study provides valuable insights for advancing food security while pursuing the goal of C neutrality in Chinese rice fields.

中国水田有机无机施肥提高粮食产量和碳中和的途径
在追求碳中和目标的同时,实现高产和碳中和对粮食安全至关重要,但这两者往往存在冲突,特别是与中国稻田的有机肥料施用相冲突。解决这一冲突需要进一步的研究和实际的改变,因为目前的研究仍然是碎片化的。因此,本研究采用反硝化-分解模型来评价无机和有机施肥对提高中国稻田碳中和和粮食产量的潜力。结果表明,氮素处理对籽粒产量和碳中性的影响分别为6.36 ~ 9.48 t C ha−1和3.49 ~ 13.42 t C ha−1。具体来说,当施用150 ~ 250 kg N ha - 1的化学氮时,观察到更高的植物碳固存,导致产量增加和碳中和。有机肥、秸秆还田、有机肥配施氮肥,籽粒产量提高约7%,碳中性降低20%。为了进一步提高产量和碳中性,在150-200 kg N - ha - 1化学施氮与绿肥配合的条件下,必须增加植株碳固存1.0 t C - ha - 1,减少N2O排放0.22 t CO2-eq ha - 1。此外,通过施用200-250 kg N ha - 1的化学氮肥与秸秆或粪肥相结合,实现更高的碳中和,要求提高植物碳固存1.2 t C ha - 1或降低全球变暖潜势。综上所述,有机肥配施150 ~ 200 kg N ha - 1的化学氮肥是提高籽粒产量和碳中和的有效途径。然而,进一步减少碳排放的努力对于加强碳中和仍然至关重要。该研究为促进粮食安全,同时实现中国稻田碳中性的目标提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信