{"title":"Exploring PM2.5 and O3 disparities and synergies management through integrated natural and sociology-environmental drivers in the YRD","authors":"Fanmei Zeng, Chu Ren, Weiqing Wang, Liguo Zhou, Xiaoyan Dai, Weichun Ma","doi":"10.1007/s11869-025-01728-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying the main factors influencing PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations is crucial for effective pollution control in urban areas. By combining optimal parameter-based geographical detector (OPGD) and multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) models, this study reveals the underlying mechanisms of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> spatial variation in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), focusing on both natural and socioeconomic indicators. The OPGD model optimized the spatial scale and zoning of geographic data, enhancing the accuracy of identifying PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> drivers compared to conventional methods. The results showed that the optimal spatial scale of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations in this study region was 9 km. Optimal discrete parameter combinations for most socioeconomic factors were quantile breaks with 9 intervals, while Natural Breaks or equal breaks were more suitable for natural factors. Both natural factors, such as precipitation, wind speed, dew point, temperature, solar radiation, and elevation, and anthropogenic factors, including land use types and vehicle numbers, were key drivers of variations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations over the years. Combined natural and socioeconomic factors significantly enhanced the explanatory power of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations. The MGWR model’s fit for key factors was highest in spring, with adjusted R² values for PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> both exceeding 0.8, indicating that the coordinated management of these pollutants should prioritize spring, particularly in areas with low wind speed, where wind interacted non-linearly with most of factors, strongly influencing PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> variation. Even in summer, when O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations differed significantly, elevation and land use types each explain over 40% of the variance. This suggests that optimizing land use structures in low-altitude urbanized areas and enhancing local dispersion conditions could improve air quality. However, during autumn and winter, no significant common factor was found to explain the variation in both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations. Vegetation-related factors, such as the Normalized Digital Vegetation Index (NDVI) and urban green coverage ratio, though weak individually, exhibited strong nonlinear interactions, highlighting their indirect role in pollutant dynamics, especially for O<sub>3</sub> in colder months and PM<sub>2.5</sub> during spring and summer. This study underscores the necessity for region-specific air pollution regulations to consider both natural and social factors across various time scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 6","pages":"1681 - 1700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-025-01728-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying the main factors influencing PM2.5 and O3 concentrations is crucial for effective pollution control in urban areas. By combining optimal parameter-based geographical detector (OPGD) and multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) models, this study reveals the underlying mechanisms of PM2.5 and O3 spatial variation in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), focusing on both natural and socioeconomic indicators. The OPGD model optimized the spatial scale and zoning of geographic data, enhancing the accuracy of identifying PM2.5 and O3 drivers compared to conventional methods. The results showed that the optimal spatial scale of PM2.5 and O3 concentrations in this study region was 9 km. Optimal discrete parameter combinations for most socioeconomic factors were quantile breaks with 9 intervals, while Natural Breaks or equal breaks were more suitable for natural factors. Both natural factors, such as precipitation, wind speed, dew point, temperature, solar radiation, and elevation, and anthropogenic factors, including land use types and vehicle numbers, were key drivers of variations in PM2.5 and O3 concentrations over the years. Combined natural and socioeconomic factors significantly enhanced the explanatory power of PM2.5 and O3 concentrations. The MGWR model’s fit for key factors was highest in spring, with adjusted R² values for PM2.5 and O3 both exceeding 0.8, indicating that the coordinated management of these pollutants should prioritize spring, particularly in areas with low wind speed, where wind interacted non-linearly with most of factors, strongly influencing PM2.5 and O3 variation. Even in summer, when O3 and PM2.5 concentrations differed significantly, elevation and land use types each explain over 40% of the variance. This suggests that optimizing land use structures in low-altitude urbanized areas and enhancing local dispersion conditions could improve air quality. However, during autumn and winter, no significant common factor was found to explain the variation in both PM2.5 and O3 concentrations. Vegetation-related factors, such as the Normalized Digital Vegetation Index (NDVI) and urban green coverage ratio, though weak individually, exhibited strong nonlinear interactions, highlighting their indirect role in pollutant dynamics, especially for O3 in colder months and PM2.5 during spring and summer. This study underscores the necessity for region-specific air pollution regulations to consider both natural and social factors across various time scales.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.