Effects of melt depletion and metasomatism on the heat generation in the continental lithospheric mantle below Jagersfontein, South Africa

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Diego I. Toro Vivanco, Jörg Hermann, Philip E. Janney, Suzette Timmerman
{"title":"Effects of melt depletion and metasomatism on the heat generation in the continental lithospheric mantle below Jagersfontein, South Africa","authors":"Diego I. Toro Vivanco,&nbsp;Jörg Hermann,&nbsp;Philip E. Janney,&nbsp;Suzette Timmerman","doi":"10.1007/s00710-025-00945-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Present-day continental lithospheric mantle (CLM) heat production estimates vary considerably and likely overestimate heat generation due to the infiltration of the host magma (i.e., kimberlite), mantle metasomatism or variable heat-producing element (HPE) ratios. We present estimates of heat production in the CLM beneath Jagersfontein, from bulk rock reconstruction of 11 peridotitic xenoliths based on in-situ analyses of primary mineralogy, to avoid kimberlite contamination. Higher concentrations of Th and U are observed in the reconstructed bulk rocks at shallower depths (&lt; 5 GPa) and decrease towards the deepest parts of the CLM (Th: 0.5–26 versus 1–5 ppb; U: 0.4–19 versus 1–3 ppb). Moreover, the reconstructed samples have a broad range of bulk K/U (~ 70-16500) and Th/U ratios (~ 0.2–3.8), outside the expected range of the modern convecting mantle. A crucial factor is garnet, as it can control the U budget, has Th/U &lt; 1 and is present across the CLM in the garnet stability field. The differences of the CLM with the convecting mantle challenge the use of assumedly constant HPE ratios to calculate the heat production. Our estimates of present-day heat generation from reconstructed bulk data yield ~ 0.0002–0.008 µW/m<sup>3</sup> at shallow depths, decreasing down to ~ 0.0005 µW/m<sup>3</sup> near the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, lower than typical heat generation values used in most previous models. The variable heat production in the CLM derives from the metasomatism and re-fertilization near the base caused by rising asthenospheric melts, which react and fractionate as they ascend, potentially carrying most of the HPE in a fluid phase to shallower depths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18547,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"119 3","pages":"691 - 714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00710-025-00945-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-025-00945-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present-day continental lithospheric mantle (CLM) heat production estimates vary considerably and likely overestimate heat generation due to the infiltration of the host magma (i.e., kimberlite), mantle metasomatism or variable heat-producing element (HPE) ratios. We present estimates of heat production in the CLM beneath Jagersfontein, from bulk rock reconstruction of 11 peridotitic xenoliths based on in-situ analyses of primary mineralogy, to avoid kimberlite contamination. Higher concentrations of Th and U are observed in the reconstructed bulk rocks at shallower depths (< 5 GPa) and decrease towards the deepest parts of the CLM (Th: 0.5–26 versus 1–5 ppb; U: 0.4–19 versus 1–3 ppb). Moreover, the reconstructed samples have a broad range of bulk K/U (~ 70-16500) and Th/U ratios (~ 0.2–3.8), outside the expected range of the modern convecting mantle. A crucial factor is garnet, as it can control the U budget, has Th/U < 1 and is present across the CLM in the garnet stability field. The differences of the CLM with the convecting mantle challenge the use of assumedly constant HPE ratios to calculate the heat production. Our estimates of present-day heat generation from reconstructed bulk data yield ~ 0.0002–0.008 µW/m3 at shallow depths, decreasing down to ~ 0.0005 µW/m3 near the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, lower than typical heat generation values used in most previous models. The variable heat production in the CLM derives from the metasomatism and re-fertilization near the base caused by rising asthenospheric melts, which react and fractionate as they ascend, potentially carrying most of the HPE in a fluid phase to shallower depths.

熔体耗竭和交代作用对南非Jagersfontein地下大陆岩石圈地幔热生成的影响
由于寄主岩浆(即金伯利岩)的渗透、地幔交代作用或不同的产热元素(HPE)比率,现今大陆岩石圈地幔(CLM)的产热估计差异很大,可能高估了产热。为了避免金伯利岩污染,我们根据原始矿物学的原位分析,通过对11个橄榄岩包体的大块岩石重建,提出了Jagersfontein下CLM的产热估计。在重建的大块岩石中,在较浅的深度(< 5gpa)观察到较高的Th和U浓度,并在CLM的最深处下降(Th: 0.5-26对1-5 ppb; U: 0.4-19对1-3 ppb)。重构样品的总体K/U(~ 70 ~ 16500)和Th/U(~ 0.2 ~ 3.8)比值范围较宽,超出了现代对流地幔的预期范围。一个关键因素是石榴石,因为它可以控制U预算,具有Th/U <; 1,并且在石榴石稳定性领域中存在于整个CLM中。CLM与对流地幔的差异挑战了假设恒定HPE比率来计算产热的使用。根据重建的大量数据,我们对当前产热的估计在浅层深度为~ 0.0002-0.008µW/m3,在岩石圈-软流圈边界附近降至~ 0.0005µW/m3,低于大多数以前模型中使用的典型产热值。CLM的变热产源于软流层熔体上升引起的基底附近的交代和再施肥,软流层熔体上升时发生反应和分馏,可能以流体形式将大部分HPE带到较浅的深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mineralogy and Petrology
Mineralogy and Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Mineralogy and Petrology welcomes manuscripts from the classical fields of mineralogy, igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry, crystallography, as well as their applications in academic experimentation and research, materials science and engineering, for technology, industry, environment, or society. The journal strongly promotes cross-fertilization among Earth-scientific and applied materials-oriented disciplines. Purely descriptive manuscripts on regional topics will not be considered. Mineralogy and Petrology was founded in 1872 by Gustav Tschermak as "Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen". It is one of Europe''s oldest geoscience journals. Former editors include outstanding names such as Gustav Tschermak, Friedrich Becke, Felix Machatschki, Josef Zemann, and Eugen F. Stumpfl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信