{"title":"Displaced, but not destroyed: archives in the Thirty Years’ War","authors":"Natalie Krentz","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09491-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper focuses on the displacement of archives during the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648). Numerous archives were seized and transported between the German principalities and across Europe during this period. Despite the fact that this upheaval occurred during wartime, very few archives were destroyed. In fact, as this article aims to show, enemy archives were often regarded as highly valuable goods, treated with care, and used for many different purposes. Analysing contemporary transport lists and archival inventories sheds light on the various ways historical actors used seized documents and ascribed value and meaning to them. This article highlights four major uses: Firstly, deeds and records were essential to establish the dominion and administration of newly conquered territories. Secondly, seized documents were used as sources of political information. Thirdly, they were printed in political pamphlets as evidence in battles of propaganda. And finally, looted documents were sold for their material value or collected as antiquarian and cultural goods. Examining the uses of archives displaced in war, thus, serves as a mirror of contemporary cultural practices of archives and documents in general. At the same time, the war itself and the ensuing displacement influenced archival practice and document use and perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09491-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09491-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper focuses on the displacement of archives during the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648). Numerous archives were seized and transported between the German principalities and across Europe during this period. Despite the fact that this upheaval occurred during wartime, very few archives were destroyed. In fact, as this article aims to show, enemy archives were often regarded as highly valuable goods, treated with care, and used for many different purposes. Analysing contemporary transport lists and archival inventories sheds light on the various ways historical actors used seized documents and ascribed value and meaning to them. This article highlights four major uses: Firstly, deeds and records were essential to establish the dominion and administration of newly conquered territories. Secondly, seized documents were used as sources of political information. Thirdly, they were printed in political pamphlets as evidence in battles of propaganda. And finally, looted documents were sold for their material value or collected as antiquarian and cultural goods. Examining the uses of archives displaced in war, thus, serves as a mirror of contemporary cultural practices of archives and documents in general. At the same time, the war itself and the ensuing displacement influenced archival practice and document use and perception.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context