Comparison of Kızılırmak and Yeşilırmak (Southern Black Sea) estuarine ecosystems based on macrobenthic biodiversity and environmental variables and new records for the macroinvertebrate fauna of Turkey

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Melih Rüzgar, Aysun Gümüş
{"title":"Comparison of Kızılırmak and Yeşilırmak (Southern Black Sea) estuarine ecosystems based on macrobenthic biodiversity and environmental variables and new records for the macroinvertebrate fauna of Turkey","authors":"Melih Rüzgar,&nbsp;Aysun Gümüş","doi":"10.1007/s00027-025-01200-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the Kızılırmak and Yeşilirmak estuarine ecosystems in Turkey, which provide significant freshwater and nutrient inputs to the Samsun Shelf area along the midsouthern Black Sea. The objective was to determine the current ecological status and to detect any significant differences between two estuarine ecosystems (restored—Kızılırmak—and natural—Yeşilırmak) in terms of macrobenthic invertebrates and environmental variables. Macrobenthic invertebrates were collected with a 500 µm mesh size kick-net. A total of four samplings, one in each season, were collected during February, May, August, and November of 2017. A total of 90 taxa, mainly oligochaetas and chironomids, were identified, composed of 51 species in Kızılırmak and 60 in Yeşilırmak. <i>Orthocladius (Orthocladius) dentifer</i>, <i>O. (O.) clarkei</i>, <i>O. (O.) dorenus</i>, <i>O. (O.) wetterenesis</i>, <i>O. (O.) mixtus</i>, and <i>Mystacides longicornis</i> were found to be new records for Turkey. The distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates was compared between season, estuary, grain size and stations. In Kızılırmak and Yeşilırmak, the region characterized as estuarine was found to be small transitional waters. In Kızılırmak, a high similarity was observed among stations, accompanied by relatively low diversity across sampling sites. This phenomenon is thought to be a natural consequence of the reconstruction activities along the river, which have deleteriously affected the ecosystem. The Yeşilırmak estuary has a more diverse macrobenthic community and appeared to be better preserved than the Kızılırmak area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55489,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Sciences","volume":"87 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00027-025-01200-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00027-025-01200-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the Kızılırmak and Yeşilirmak estuarine ecosystems in Turkey, which provide significant freshwater and nutrient inputs to the Samsun Shelf area along the midsouthern Black Sea. The objective was to determine the current ecological status and to detect any significant differences between two estuarine ecosystems (restored—Kızılırmak—and natural—Yeşilırmak) in terms of macrobenthic invertebrates and environmental variables. Macrobenthic invertebrates were collected with a 500 µm mesh size kick-net. A total of four samplings, one in each season, were collected during February, May, August, and November of 2017. A total of 90 taxa, mainly oligochaetas and chironomids, were identified, composed of 51 species in Kızılırmak and 60 in Yeşilırmak. Orthocladius (Orthocladius) dentifer, O. (O.) clarkei, O. (O.) dorenus, O. (O.) wetterenesis, O. (O.) mixtus, and Mystacides longicornis were found to be new records for Turkey. The distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates was compared between season, estuary, grain size and stations. In Kızılırmak and Yeşilırmak, the region characterized as estuarine was found to be small transitional waters. In Kızılırmak, a high similarity was observed among stations, accompanied by relatively low diversity across sampling sites. This phenomenon is thought to be a natural consequence of the reconstruction activities along the river, which have deleteriously affected the ecosystem. The Yeşilırmak estuary has a more diverse macrobenthic community and appeared to be better preserved than the Kızılırmak area.

基于大型底栖生物多样性和环境变量以及土耳其大型无脊椎动物区系新记录的Kızılırmak和Yeşilırmak(黑海南部)河口生态系统比较
本研究调查了土耳其的Kızılırmak和ye ilirmak河口生态系统,它们为黑海中南部的Samsun陆架地区提供了大量的淡水和营养输入。目的是确定目前的生态状况,并查明两个河口生态系统(restored-Kızılırmak-and natural-Yeşilırmak)在大型底栖无脊椎动物和环境变量方面的任何重大差异。大型底栖无脊椎动物用500µm孔径的踢网收集。2017年2月、5月、8月和11月共采集4份样本,每个季节1份。共鉴定出90个分类群,其中Kızılırmak区51种,Yeşilırmak区60种,以少毛纲和手拟纲为主。在土耳其发现了新记录的Orthocladius (Orthocladius) dentifer、O. (O.) clarkei、O. (O.) dorenus、O. (O.) wetterenesis、O. (O.) mixtus和Mystacides longicornis。比较了季节、河口、粒度和站点间大型底栖无脊椎动物的分布。Kızılırmak和Yeşilırmak以河口为特征的区域为小型过渡水域。在Kızılırmak中,观测站之间观察到高度的相似性,伴随着采样点之间相对较低的多样性。这一现象被认为是沿江重建活动的自然结果,这些活动对生态系统造成了有害影响。Yeşilırmak河口的大型底栖生物群落更加多样化,并且似乎比Kızılırmak地区保存得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Sciences
Aquatic Sciences 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
60
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aquatic Sciences – Research Across Boundaries publishes original research, overviews, and reviews dealing with aquatic systems (both freshwater and marine systems) and their boundaries, including the impact of human activities on these systems. The coverage ranges from molecular-level mechanistic studies to investigations at the whole ecosystem scale. Aquatic Sciences publishes articles presenting research across disciplinary and environmental boundaries, including studies examining interactions among geological, microbial, biological, chemical, physical, hydrological, and societal processes, as well as studies assessing land-water, air-water, benthic-pelagic, river-ocean, lentic-lotic, and groundwater-surface water interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信