Methods for quantifying low populations of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in vegetable soils and their potential for use in monitoring programs to improve nematode management decisions

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES
Graham Roy Stirling, Neil L. Wilson, Jennifer A. Cobon, Wayne T. O’Neill
{"title":"Methods for quantifying low populations of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in vegetable soils and their potential for use in monitoring programs to improve nematode management decisions","authors":"Graham Roy Stirling,&nbsp;Neil L. Wilson,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Cobon,&nbsp;Wayne T. O’Neill","doi":"10.1007/s13313-025-01058-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most Australian vegetable growers apply fumigants or nematicides as a precautionary nematode control measure when crops susceptible to root-knot nematode (RKN, <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp.) are grown in soils and environmental conditions suitable for the nematode. The only way growers can make rational decisions on whether these expensive and environmentally disruptive chemicals are required is to regularly monitor RKN populations and decide whether numbers prior to planting are high enough to cause economic damage. However, such monitoring programs are difficult to implement because nematode quantification methods vary in efficiency and the damage threshold for RKN on highly susceptible vegetable crops is often &lt; 10 root-knot nematodes /200 mL soil. Consequently, five nematode quantification methods were tested to see whether they could reliably detect these very low population densities of RKN. Two novel methods produced consistent results: 1) extracting nematodes from 2 L soil samples using Whitehead trays, quantifying the RKN DNA in the nematode suspension using molecular methods, and generating a standard curve so that the molecular results provided an estimate of the total number of RKN individuals in the sample, and 2) a bioassay in which two tomato seedlings were planted in pots containing 2 L soil and the number of galls produced on roots were counted after 21–25 days. Both methods could be used to quantify low populations of RKN, but bioassays are more practical because expensive equipment and facilities are not required and they can be done at a local level by people lacking nematological or molecular skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8598,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Plant Pathology","volume":"54 3","pages":"387 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13313-025-01058-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most Australian vegetable growers apply fumigants or nematicides as a precautionary nematode control measure when crops susceptible to root-knot nematode (RKN, Meloidogyne spp.) are grown in soils and environmental conditions suitable for the nematode. The only way growers can make rational decisions on whether these expensive and environmentally disruptive chemicals are required is to regularly monitor RKN populations and decide whether numbers prior to planting are high enough to cause economic damage. However, such monitoring programs are difficult to implement because nematode quantification methods vary in efficiency and the damage threshold for RKN on highly susceptible vegetable crops is often < 10 root-knot nematodes /200 mL soil. Consequently, five nematode quantification methods were tested to see whether they could reliably detect these very low population densities of RKN. Two novel methods produced consistent results: 1) extracting nematodes from 2 L soil samples using Whitehead trays, quantifying the RKN DNA in the nematode suspension using molecular methods, and generating a standard curve so that the molecular results provided an estimate of the total number of RKN individuals in the sample, and 2) a bioassay in which two tomato seedlings were planted in pots containing 2 L soil and the number of galls produced on roots were counted after 21–25 days. Both methods could be used to quantify low populations of RKN, but bioassays are more practical because expensive equipment and facilities are not required and they can be done at a local level by people lacking nematological or molecular skills.

蔬菜土壤中根结线虫(Meloidogyne spp.)低种群的量化方法及其在监测项目中用于改善线虫管理决策的潜力
当作物易受根结线虫(RKN, Meloidogyne spp.)感染时,大多数澳大利亚蔬菜种植者使用熏蒸剂或杀线虫剂作为预防线虫控制措施,这些作物生长在适合线虫生长的土壤和环境条件下。对于是否需要使用这些昂贵且破坏环境的化学品,种植者能够做出理性决定的唯一方法是定期监测RKN的数量,并确定种植前的RKN数量是否高到足以造成经济损失。然而,由于线虫量化方法的效率各不相同,并且RKN对高易感蔬菜作物的危害阈值通常为10根结线虫/200 mL土壤,因此此类监测方案难以实施。因此,测试了五种线虫量化方法,以确定它们是否能够可靠地检测这些非常低的RKN种群密度。两个新方法产生一致的结果:1)从2 L土壤样本中提取线虫使用怀特黑德托盘,量化RKN DNA线虫悬挂使用分子方法,并生成一个标准曲线,这样的分子总数的结果提供了一个估计RKN个体样本,和2)生物测定中包含2 L两个番茄幼苗栽在盆土和根五倍子生产的数量是21 - 25日天后统计。这两种方法都可以用来量化RKN的低种群,但是生物测定更实用,因为不需要昂贵的设备和设施,而且它们可以由缺乏线虫学或分子技能的人在地方一级完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Plant Pathology
Australasian Plant Pathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Australasian Plant Pathology presents new and significant research in all facets of the field of plant pathology. Dedicated to a worldwide readership, the journal focuses on research in the Australasian region, including Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea, as well as the Indian, Pacific regions. Australasian Plant Pathology is the official journal of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信