Policy recommendations to accelerate the replacement of inef-ficient electric motors in the EU

IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
João Fong, Bruno de Wachter, Ivan Sangiorgio, Nikos Ntaras, Maria Zarkadoula, Anibal T. de Almeida
{"title":"Policy recommendations to accelerate the replacement of inef-ficient electric motors in the EU","authors":"João Fong,&nbsp;Bruno de Wachter,&nbsp;Ivan Sangiorgio,&nbsp;Nikos Ntaras,&nbsp;Maria Zarkadoula,&nbsp;Anibal T. de Almeida","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10338-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electric motors service longer than is generally assumed, resulting in large numbers of inefficient motors remaining in service. Replacing them faster would free up additional energy savings – a contribution not to be overlooked in view of the energy efficiency objectives set out at COP28. The savings potential is even greater if the entire motor system is optimized at the same time. The EU-funded initiative EU-MORE conducted a review of current policy measures stimulating motor replacement in EU Member States, on the basis of publicly available data sources and with the help of national experts. The identified measures were analysed for their approach, impact, and the lessons learned. The review revealed that support measures of a financial nature formed the large majority, while it is questionable whether these are still the most effective in times of high electricity prices. The lack of insight into the benefits of motor replacement is much less addressed. A significant proportion of the identified measures address industrial energy efficiency in general, often without mentioning motor replacement as an eligible measure. Only a few countries have developed policy instruments specifically promoting a system approach to motor replacement. The review is followed by recommendations aiming to tackle these shortcomings and build on the success factors of existing policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-025-10338-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-025-10338-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric motors service longer than is generally assumed, resulting in large numbers of inefficient motors remaining in service. Replacing them faster would free up additional energy savings – a contribution not to be overlooked in view of the energy efficiency objectives set out at COP28. The savings potential is even greater if the entire motor system is optimized at the same time. The EU-funded initiative EU-MORE conducted a review of current policy measures stimulating motor replacement in EU Member States, on the basis of publicly available data sources and with the help of national experts. The identified measures were analysed for their approach, impact, and the lessons learned. The review revealed that support measures of a financial nature formed the large majority, while it is questionable whether these are still the most effective in times of high electricity prices. The lack of insight into the benefits of motor replacement is much less addressed. A significant proportion of the identified measures address industrial energy efficiency in general, often without mentioning motor replacement as an eligible measure. Only a few countries have developed policy instruments specifically promoting a system approach to motor replacement. The review is followed by recommendations aiming to tackle these shortcomings and build on the success factors of existing policies.

在欧盟加速更换低效率电动机的政策建议
电动机的使用时间比通常假设的要长,导致大量低效电动机仍在使用中。更快地替换它们将节省额外的能源——鉴于COP28设定的能源效率目标,这一贡献不容忽视。如果整个电机系统同时进行优化,则节省的潜力甚至更大。欧盟资助的EU- more计划在各国专家的帮助下,根据公开的数据来源,对欧盟成员国当前刺激电机更换的政策措施进行了审查。对确定的措施的方法、影响和吸取的教训进行了分析。审查显示,金融性质的支持措施占绝大多数,但值得怀疑的是,这些措施在高电价时期是否仍然最有效。缺乏对电机更换的好处的了解很少得到解决。确定的措施中有很大一部分是针对工业能源效率的,通常没有提到电机更换是一个合格的措施。只有少数国家制定了政策工具,专门促进对更换电动机采取系统办法。审查之后提出建议,旨在解决这些缺点,并以现有政策的成功因素为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信