Unwanted Pregnancies and Unwanted Laws: Public Support for the Criminalization of Abortion and the Consequences for Criminal Justice Officials

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ben Brown
{"title":"Unwanted Pregnancies and Unwanted Laws: Public Support for the Criminalization of Abortion and the Consequences for Criminal Justice Officials","authors":"Ben Brown","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09802-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For roughly half a century, from 1973 to 2022, a woman’s autonomy to have an abortion was a constitutionally protected right. The situation changed in 2022 when the Supreme Court ruled in <i>Dobbs v. Jackson</i> that the Constitution does not confer the right to have an abortion and more than a dozen states enacted statutory abortion bans which make the performance of the procedure a felony offense. The present study provides analyses of survey data on public support for the criminalization of abortion gathered from a random sample of more than 1,500 respondents subsequent to the Court’s ruling in <i>Dobbs v. Jackson</i> and the enactment of the abortion bans. The results of the analyses show that more than three out of four respondents opposed laws which proscribe abortion, with support for the criminalization of abortion being most significantly impacted by political ideology and religious beliefs. The finding that there is a paucity of public support for the recently enacted statutory abortion bans suggest that the statutes undermine the principles of democracy, erode the legitimacy of the law, are unlikely to be willingly obeyed, and create multiple challenges for criminal justice officials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 4","pages":"641 - 663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09802-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For roughly half a century, from 1973 to 2022, a woman’s autonomy to have an abortion was a constitutionally protected right. The situation changed in 2022 when the Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson that the Constitution does not confer the right to have an abortion and more than a dozen states enacted statutory abortion bans which make the performance of the procedure a felony offense. The present study provides analyses of survey data on public support for the criminalization of abortion gathered from a random sample of more than 1,500 respondents subsequent to the Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson and the enactment of the abortion bans. The results of the analyses show that more than three out of four respondents opposed laws which proscribe abortion, with support for the criminalization of abortion being most significantly impacted by political ideology and religious beliefs. The finding that there is a paucity of public support for the recently enacted statutory abortion bans suggest that the statutes undermine the principles of democracy, erode the legitimacy of the law, are unlikely to be willingly obeyed, and create multiple challenges for criminal justice officials.

意外怀孕和意外法律:公众支持将堕胎定为刑事犯罪及其对刑事司法官员的影响
在大约半个世纪的时间里,从1973年到2022年,女性堕胎的自主权是一项受宪法保护的权利。这种情况在2022年发生了变化,当时最高法院在多布斯诉杰克逊案中裁定,宪法没有赋予堕胎的权利,十几个州颁布了法定堕胎禁令,将堕胎视为重罪。本研究分析了在最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案作出裁决和颁布堕胎禁令之后,从1500多名受访者中随机抽取的公众支持将堕胎定为刑事犯罪的调查数据。分析结果表明,四分之三以上的答复者反对禁止堕胎的法律,支持将堕胎定为刑事犯罪受到政治意识形态和宗教信仰的最大影响。调查发现,公众对最近颁布的堕胎禁令缺乏支持,这表明这些法规破坏了民主原则,侵蚀了法律的合法性,不太可能被自愿遵守,并给刑事司法官员带来了多重挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Criminal Justice
American Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信