Palestine as provenance: archiving against genocide from Gaza to South Lebanon (Jabal Amil)

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
J. J. Ghaddar
{"title":"Palestine as provenance: archiving against genocide from Gaza to South Lebanon (Jabal Amil)","authors":"J. J. Ghaddar","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09484-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How can we archive against genocide in Gaza and its extension elsewhere in Palestine and surrounding countries like Lebanon in this urgent moment while avoiding the pitfalls of white guilt and paternalistic benevolence? How can we draw on models and practices of mutual aid and solidarity between Lebanon and Palestine to articulate a robust decolonial archival praxis (Ghaddar and Caswell in Arch Sci 19(2):71–85, 2019)? To answer these questions, I outline the ongoing deliberate targeting of Gaza’s archives and documentary heritage as part of a systematic campaign of erasure of local history alongside the people who hold and produce the living memory, culture, and knowledge. I also consider the repetition of these destructive practices before, during and since the Nakba as part of a concerted Orientalist/Zionist policy aimed at manufacturing a false claim of Israeli nativity, and remaking the region according to racist fantasies and biblical myths. Emphasizing the importance of documenting the genocide in Gaza, and archiving political activism against the project of “Greater Isreal,” I outline the long history and incredible breadth of Palestinian and Lebanese counter archiving initiatives. In turn, I focus on one such effort, Fighting Erasure: Digitizing Gaza’s Genocide and the War on Lebanon, a participatory action research, archival and teaching project co-led by myself, Dr. Hanine Shehadeh and Dr. Rami Zurayk, through an expansive network of Palestinian, Lebanese, regional and international professionals, communities and organizations. I inform on key project activities and some of the many challenges of doing this work, from bullets and bombs to sieges and sanctions, while being silenced and dealing with the general abandonment of the international community of our Palestinian and Lebanese colleagues. I also touch on some of the project’s innovative practices and frameworks, including its <i>archiving in place</i> ethos, decentralized and non-corporate model for digital infrastructures, and insistence on global collaborations that are locally grounded. Along the way, I build on my previous theorizing of <i>provenance in place</i> and <i>Palestine as provenance</i> in relation dominant archival practices and standards like ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description (2000), the Fighting Erasure project and, more broadly, the radical ethos and liberatory praxis emerging from counter archiving practices and initiatives in Palestine and Lebanon.</p><p>\nRecreation by Ibrahim Abusitta of an image of an IOF soldier posing for a picture in front of burning books. A screenshot of the original image was tweeted out by Younis Tirawi (@ytirawi), a Palestinian reporter on security and political affairs. In a fact check for snopes.com, Taija PerryCook reports the location is presumed to be the Central Library of the Islamic University of Gaza. The image was originally published in Briarpatch on July 23, 2024. It is republished with permission of Briarpatch and the artist.</p>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09484-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09484-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can we archive against genocide in Gaza and its extension elsewhere in Palestine and surrounding countries like Lebanon in this urgent moment while avoiding the pitfalls of white guilt and paternalistic benevolence? How can we draw on models and practices of mutual aid and solidarity between Lebanon and Palestine to articulate a robust decolonial archival praxis (Ghaddar and Caswell in Arch Sci 19(2):71–85, 2019)? To answer these questions, I outline the ongoing deliberate targeting of Gaza’s archives and documentary heritage as part of a systematic campaign of erasure of local history alongside the people who hold and produce the living memory, culture, and knowledge. I also consider the repetition of these destructive practices before, during and since the Nakba as part of a concerted Orientalist/Zionist policy aimed at manufacturing a false claim of Israeli nativity, and remaking the region according to racist fantasies and biblical myths. Emphasizing the importance of documenting the genocide in Gaza, and archiving political activism against the project of “Greater Isreal,” I outline the long history and incredible breadth of Palestinian and Lebanese counter archiving initiatives. In turn, I focus on one such effort, Fighting Erasure: Digitizing Gaza’s Genocide and the War on Lebanon, a participatory action research, archival and teaching project co-led by myself, Dr. Hanine Shehadeh and Dr. Rami Zurayk, through an expansive network of Palestinian, Lebanese, regional and international professionals, communities and organizations. I inform on key project activities and some of the many challenges of doing this work, from bullets and bombs to sieges and sanctions, while being silenced and dealing with the general abandonment of the international community of our Palestinian and Lebanese colleagues. I also touch on some of the project’s innovative practices and frameworks, including its archiving in place ethos, decentralized and non-corporate model for digital infrastructures, and insistence on global collaborations that are locally grounded. Along the way, I build on my previous theorizing of provenance in place and Palestine as provenance in relation dominant archival practices and standards like ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description (2000), the Fighting Erasure project and, more broadly, the radical ethos and liberatory praxis emerging from counter archiving practices and initiatives in Palestine and Lebanon.

Recreation by Ibrahim Abusitta of an image of an IOF soldier posing for a picture in front of burning books. A screenshot of the original image was tweeted out by Younis Tirawi (@ytirawi), a Palestinian reporter on security and political affairs. In a fact check for snopes.com, Taija PerryCook reports the location is presumed to be the Central Library of the Islamic University of Gaza. The image was originally published in Briarpatch on July 23, 2024. It is republished with permission of Briarpatch and the artist.

巴勒斯坦作为起源:从加沙到南黎巴嫩的种族灭绝档案(人民报)
在这个紧迫的时刻,我们如何在避免白人内疚和家长式仁慈的陷阱的同时,反对加沙及其在巴勒斯坦其他地方和黎巴嫩等周边国家的种族灭绝?我们如何利用黎巴嫩和巴勒斯坦之间互助和团结的模式和实践来阐明一个强大的非殖民化档案实践(Ghaddar和Caswell,《科学》19(2):71-85,2019)?为了回答这些问题,我概述了正在进行的蓄意针对加沙档案和文献遗产的行动,这是一场系统性运动的一部分,旨在抹去当地历史,同时抹去拥有和创造生活记忆、文化和知识的人们。我还认为,在Nakba之前、期间和之后,这些破坏性做法的重复,是东方主义者/犹太复国主义者协调一致的政策的一部分,旨在制造以色列诞生地的虚假声明,并根据种族主义幻想和圣经神话重塑该地区。我强调记录加沙种族灭绝的重要性,并将反对“大以色列”计划的政治活动存档,概述了巴勒斯坦和黎巴嫩反存档倡议的悠久历史和令人难以置信的广度。反过来,我将重点关注其中一项努力,即“打击抹除:数字化加沙的种族灭绝和黎巴嫩战争”,这是一个参与性行动研究、档案和教学项目,由我、Hanine Shehadeh博士和Rami Zurayk博士共同领导,通过一个由巴勒斯坦、黎巴嫩、地区和国际专业人士、社区和组织组成的广泛网络。我将介绍主要的项目活动和从事这项工作的许多挑战,从子弹和炸弹到围困和制裁,同时保持沉默并处理国际社会对我们的巴勒斯坦和黎巴嫩同事的普遍抛弃。我还谈到了该项目的一些创新实践和框架,包括其就地存档的精神、数字基础设施的分散和非企业模式,以及坚持以本地为基础的全球合作。在此过程中,我建立在我之前的关于出处的理论基础上,并将巴勒斯坦作为主要档案实践和标准的出处,如ISAD(G):通用国际标准档案描述(2000),战斗擦除项目,以及更广泛地说,巴勒斯坦和黎巴嫩的反档案实践和倡议中出现的激进精神和解放实践。易卜拉欣·阿布西塔(Ibrahim Abusitta)创作的一幅IOF士兵在燃烧的书籍前摆姿势拍照的图像。巴勒斯坦安全和政治事务记者Younis Tirawi (@ytirawi)在推特上发布了原始图片的截图。在snopes.com网站的事实核查中,Taija PerryCook报道说,地点可能是加沙伊斯兰大学的中央图书馆。这张照片最初于2024年7月23日在Briarpatch发表。经Briarpatch和艺术家许可,本文再次发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信