Modeling Spatial Accessibility of Healthcare Services for the Elderly Population with a SAM-G2SFCA Method: A Resource-Sharing Perspective

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zheng Gong, Chengzhi Zhang, Zhihui Song, Keying Peng, Feng Gao, Shaoli Li, Shaoying Li
{"title":"Modeling Spatial Accessibility of Healthcare Services for the Elderly Population with a SAM-G2SFCA Method: A Resource-Sharing Perspective","authors":"Zheng Gong,&nbsp;Chengzhi Zhang,&nbsp;Zhihui Song,&nbsp;Keying Peng,&nbsp;Feng Gao,&nbsp;Shaoli Li,&nbsp;Shaoying Li","doi":"10.1007/s12061-025-09677-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accessibility of healthcare services is a paramount determinant of elderly health outcomes. However, existing research often neglects the effects of resource-sharing pressures among different demographic groups for healthcare resources when measuring the accessibility for elderly population. To bridge this gap, this study developed a Supply Allocation Model (SAM) that considers the interactions between the elderly and non-elderly populations, as well as the distribution of healthcare resources. The model was subsequently integrated with the G2SFCA method, utilizing demographic, mobile phone, and point of interest (POI) datasets to assess the spatial accessibility of healthcare services for the elderly population in Guangzhou, China. The model’s accuracy and reliability were tested through calibration and validation processes, utilizing real-world healthcare treatment datasets. The effectiveness of the SAM was measured through the computation of the healthcare accessibility index and the Gini coefficient, utilizing both the SAM-G2SFCA and G2SFCA models. The results show that the SAM achieves the highest prediction accuracy at a 15-minute threshold. As the time threshold decreases, the role of supply factors in predicting the proportion of healthcare utilization strengthens. Moreover, the SAM-G2SFCA leads to a reduction in the equity of accessibility across all time thresholds when compared to the G2SFCA method, particularly in peripheral urban areas where elderly populations face greater resource-sharing pressures and healthcare accessibility is often overestimated. These findings provide valuable insights for policy formulation and theoretical advancement, informing the design of more equitable and efficient healthcare resource allocation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09677-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessibility of healthcare services is a paramount determinant of elderly health outcomes. However, existing research often neglects the effects of resource-sharing pressures among different demographic groups for healthcare resources when measuring the accessibility for elderly population. To bridge this gap, this study developed a Supply Allocation Model (SAM) that considers the interactions between the elderly and non-elderly populations, as well as the distribution of healthcare resources. The model was subsequently integrated with the G2SFCA method, utilizing demographic, mobile phone, and point of interest (POI) datasets to assess the spatial accessibility of healthcare services for the elderly population in Guangzhou, China. The model’s accuracy and reliability were tested through calibration and validation processes, utilizing real-world healthcare treatment datasets. The effectiveness of the SAM was measured through the computation of the healthcare accessibility index and the Gini coefficient, utilizing both the SAM-G2SFCA and G2SFCA models. The results show that the SAM achieves the highest prediction accuracy at a 15-minute threshold. As the time threshold decreases, the role of supply factors in predicting the proportion of healthcare utilization strengthens. Moreover, the SAM-G2SFCA leads to a reduction in the equity of accessibility across all time thresholds when compared to the G2SFCA method, particularly in peripheral urban areas where elderly populations face greater resource-sharing pressures and healthcare accessibility is often overestimated. These findings provide valuable insights for policy formulation and theoretical advancement, informing the design of more equitable and efficient healthcare resource allocation strategies.

Abstract Image

基于SAM-G2SFCA方法的老年人医疗卫生服务空间可达性建模:资源共享视角
保健服务的可及性是老年人健康结果的最重要决定因素。然而,现有研究在衡量老年人口医疗资源可及性时,往往忽略了不同人口群体之间资源共享压力对医疗资源可及性的影响。为了弥补这一差距,本研究开发了一个供给分配模型(SAM),该模型考虑了老年人和非老年人之间的相互作用,以及医疗资源的分配。该模型随后与G2SFCA方法相结合,利用人口统计、移动电话和兴趣点(POI)数据集评估中国广州老年人口医疗保健服务的空间可达性。利用真实世界的医疗保健治疗数据集,通过校准和验证过程测试了模型的准确性和可靠性。利用SAM-G2SFCA和G2SFCA模型,通过计算医疗可及性指数和基尼系数来衡量SAM的有效性。结果表明,在15分钟阈值下,SAM的预测精度最高。随着时间阈值的降低,供给因素对医疗保健利用比例的预测作用增强。此外,与G2SFCA方法相比,SAM-G2SFCA导致所有时间阈值的可及性公平性降低,特别是在老年人口面临更大资源共享压力且医疗可及性往往被高估的外围城市地区。这些发现为政策制定和理论发展提供了有价值的见解,为设计更公平、更有效的医疗资源分配策略提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信