Estimation of Elastic Modulus with Multiple Indenters

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Y. Yoon, G. Han, N. Kim, H. Lee
{"title":"Estimation of Elastic Modulus with Multiple Indenters","authors":"Y. Yoon,&nbsp;G. Han,&nbsp;N. Kim,&nbsp;H. Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11340-025-01173-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conventional Oliver-Pharr method of estimating elastic modulus shows reasonably good accuracy, but errors occur due to inaccuracies in the actual contact area.</p><p>To resolve this issue, this study proposed a new method to estimate the elastic modulus using two different indenters without additional equipment or complicated calibration. We aimed to estimate the elastic modulus using the theoretical indentation depth, without the consideration of sink-in <b>/</b> pile-up effect.</p><p>A numerical indentation test was performed using Berkovich and spherical indenters, and the theoretical contact area and initial unloading slope of the indentation load-depth curve were calculated to derive <i>c</i>-ratio based on the correction factor <i>c</i>. Numerical validation using finite element analysis for various material properties of <i>J</i><sub><i>2</i></sub> and pressure-dependent hardening models showed that the method estimates the elastic modulus with <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 98 %, outperforming the conventional method.</p><p>Microindentation tests were conducted on copper, Al1050, SS304 specimens for experimental validation. The estimated elastic moduli with proposed method showed good agreement with those from tensile tests with an error of 7 %.</p><p>This study proposed a new method for estimating elastic modulus that overcomes the limitations of the conventional method, which is difficult to accurately measure the actual contact area at maximum load, and has high applicability to various materials by using the correction factor <i>c</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"65 6","pages":"943 - 953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-025-01173-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional Oliver-Pharr method of estimating elastic modulus shows reasonably good accuracy, but errors occur due to inaccuracies in the actual contact area.

To resolve this issue, this study proposed a new method to estimate the elastic modulus using two different indenters without additional equipment or complicated calibration. We aimed to estimate the elastic modulus using the theoretical indentation depth, without the consideration of sink-in / pile-up effect.

A numerical indentation test was performed using Berkovich and spherical indenters, and the theoretical contact area and initial unloading slope of the indentation load-depth curve were calculated to derive c-ratio based on the correction factor c. Numerical validation using finite element analysis for various material properties of J2 and pressure-dependent hardening models showed that the method estimates the elastic modulus with R 2 = 98 %, outperforming the conventional method.

Microindentation tests were conducted on copper, Al1050, SS304 specimens for experimental validation. The estimated elastic moduli with proposed method showed good agreement with those from tensile tests with an error of 7 %.

This study proposed a new method for estimating elastic modulus that overcomes the limitations of the conventional method, which is difficult to accurately measure the actual contact area at maximum load, and has high applicability to various materials by using the correction factor c.

Abstract Image

多压头弹性模量的估计
传统的估算弹性模量的oliver - farr方法具有较好的精度,但由于实际接触面积的不精确而产生误差。为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了一种利用两个不同的压头估算弹性模量的新方法,无需额外的设备或复杂的校准。我们的目标是使用理论压痕深度来估计弹性模量,而不考虑下沉/堆积效应。采用Berkovich和球形压头进行了数值压痕试验,计算了压痕载荷-深度曲线的理论接触面积和初始卸载斜率,并基于修正系数c推导出了c比。基于J2各种材料特性的有限元分析和压力相关硬化模型的数值验证表明,该方法估算的弹性模量r2 = 98%,优于传统方法。对铜、Al1050、SS304试样进行了微压痕实验验证。用该方法估算的弹性模量与拉伸试验结果吻合较好,误差为7%。本研究提出了一种估算弹性模量的新方法,克服了传统方法在最大载荷下难以准确测量实际接触面积的局限性,并利用修正系数c对各种材料具有较高的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Mechanics
Experimental Mechanics 物理-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome. Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信