Georgia Tsartsidou, Mary C. Stiner, Mihriban Özbaşaran
{"title":"Aşıklı Höyük phytoliths: basketry and matting in households and burials","authors":"Georgia Tsartsidou, Mary C. Stiner, Mihriban Özbaşaran","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02252-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phytolith analysis conducted at the pre-pottery Neolithic site of Aşıklı Höyük has revealed the common use of basketry and plant fibre matting in domestic and burial contexts. The analysis focused on phytolith traces that preserve the shape of the original artefact on the surface of human skeletons buried below house floors, baskets from houses and burials, as well as within the perforated areas of beads that decorated the skeletons. This article presents results on the plant raw materials used and the fibre production techniques employed. The social customs and the fashion of the time were also investigated. The results show that the mats recovered in almost all the archaeological layers of the site were manufactured from the stems and leaves of common reed <i>(Phragmites australis)</i>, following the same tradition through time. Reed leaf fibres seem to have been used for stringing the beads of a necklace that was found on an infant skeleton. For the mats, the makers applied a tabby technique in most cases, and they employed a variety of patterns to create more complex textures. Special care in the mat weaving is indicated only for the material encasing the infant burials. For the baskets, the makers adopted different techniques and plant materials, depending on the use and needs as well as plant availability. These methods involved coiling and plaiting of reeds (Arundinoideae), sedges (Cyperaceae) and grasses (Gramineae), as well as a combination of common reed stems and ash <i>(Fraxinus</i> sp.) branches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02252-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phytolith analysis conducted at the pre-pottery Neolithic site of Aşıklı Höyük has revealed the common use of basketry and plant fibre matting in domestic and burial contexts. The analysis focused on phytolith traces that preserve the shape of the original artefact on the surface of human skeletons buried below house floors, baskets from houses and burials, as well as within the perforated areas of beads that decorated the skeletons. This article presents results on the plant raw materials used and the fibre production techniques employed. The social customs and the fashion of the time were also investigated. The results show that the mats recovered in almost all the archaeological layers of the site were manufactured from the stems and leaves of common reed (Phragmites australis), following the same tradition through time. Reed leaf fibres seem to have been used for stringing the beads of a necklace that was found on an infant skeleton. For the mats, the makers applied a tabby technique in most cases, and they employed a variety of patterns to create more complex textures. Special care in the mat weaving is indicated only for the material encasing the infant burials. For the baskets, the makers adopted different techniques and plant materials, depending on the use and needs as well as plant availability. These methods involved coiling and plaiting of reeds (Arundinoideae), sedges (Cyperaceae) and grasses (Gramineae), as well as a combination of common reed stems and ash (Fraxinus sp.) branches.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).