Influence of fabrication techniques, impregnation processes, and workmanship quality on the bonding performance of FRP anchors

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mehdi Khorasani, Giovanni Muciaccia, Andrea Nino Consiglio, Davood Mostofinejad
{"title":"Influence of fabrication techniques, impregnation processes, and workmanship quality on the bonding performance of FRP anchors","authors":"Mehdi Khorasani,&nbsp;Giovanni Muciaccia,&nbsp;Andrea Nino Consiglio,&nbsp;Davood Mostofinejad","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02712-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) anchors as a method to mitigate premature debonding of FRP strips. The research focuses on the influence of fiber impregnation techniques in dowel regions, considering the effects of hole cleanliness, workmanship quality, and testing under confined and unconfined conditions. A key aspect of this study is the investigation of impregnation procedures performed under confined conditions, an area that has received limited attention in previous research. The experimental program included three large-scale concrete slabs (1250 × 1550 × 250 mm<sup>3</sup>) and twenty-seven FRP anchor specimens subjected to pull-out tests. The results indicate that fully impregnated anchors exhibited the highest capacity, whereas non-impregnated anchors in the dowel zone showed a significant reduction in performance. Bond strength under confined conditions, typically governed by bond failure, was approximately 50% higher than in unconfined scenarios, where concrete cone failure was predominant. Furthermore, the findings suggest that dowel inclination angles exceeding 15° led to a considerable reduction in pull-out capacity. Analytical models were developed to predict anchor capacity under varying loading conditions, highlighting the need to align modeling approaches with anticipated failure modes. Additionally, thorough cleaning of anchor holes increased load-carrying capacity by up to 20%, emphasizing the importance of proper installation procedures. This study contributes to the optimization of FRP anchor design and installation for improved structural performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02712-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) anchors as a method to mitigate premature debonding of FRP strips. The research focuses on the influence of fiber impregnation techniques in dowel regions, considering the effects of hole cleanliness, workmanship quality, and testing under confined and unconfined conditions. A key aspect of this study is the investigation of impregnation procedures performed under confined conditions, an area that has received limited attention in previous research. The experimental program included three large-scale concrete slabs (1250 × 1550 × 250 mm3) and twenty-seven FRP anchor specimens subjected to pull-out tests. The results indicate that fully impregnated anchors exhibited the highest capacity, whereas non-impregnated anchors in the dowel zone showed a significant reduction in performance. Bond strength under confined conditions, typically governed by bond failure, was approximately 50% higher than in unconfined scenarios, where concrete cone failure was predominant. Furthermore, the findings suggest that dowel inclination angles exceeding 15° led to a considerable reduction in pull-out capacity. Analytical models were developed to predict anchor capacity under varying loading conditions, highlighting the need to align modeling approaches with anticipated failure modes. Additionally, thorough cleaning of anchor holes increased load-carrying capacity by up to 20%, emphasizing the importance of proper installation procedures. This study contributes to the optimization of FRP anchor design and installation for improved structural performance.

Abstract Image

制造工艺、浸渍工艺和工艺质量对FRP锚杆粘结性能的影响
本研究考察了纤维增强聚合物(FRP)锚作为一种减轻FRP条过早剥离的方法的行为。重点研究了纤维浸渍技术对钉孔区域的影响,考虑了孔清洁度、工艺质量以及承压和无承压条件下测试的影响。本研究的一个关键方面是在受限条件下进行的浸渍程序的调查,这是一个在以前的研究中受到有限关注的领域。试验方案包括3块大型混凝土板(1250 × 1550 × 250 mm3)和27个FRP锚固试件进行拉拔试验。结果表明,完全浸渍锚杆的承载力最高,而未浸渍锚杆的承载力则显著下降。约束条件下的粘结强度(通常由粘结破坏决定)比无约束条件下高约50%,无约束条件下主要是混凝土锥体破坏。此外,研究结果表明,销钉倾角超过15°会导致拉出能力大幅降低。开发了分析模型来预测不同荷载条件下的锚固能力,强调需要将建模方法与预期的破坏模式保持一致。此外,彻底清洁锚孔可将承载能力提高20%,强调了正确安装程序的重要性。本研究有助于优化FRP锚杆的设计和安装,提高结构性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信