The Impact of Water-Based Fire Suppression Systems on Combustion Products

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lei Jiang, Davood Zeinali, Kemal Sarp Arsava, Dag Olav Snersrud
{"title":"The Impact of Water-Based Fire Suppression Systems on Combustion Products","authors":"Lei Jiang,&nbsp;Davood Zeinali,&nbsp;Kemal Sarp Arsava,&nbsp;Dag Olav Snersrud","doi":"10.1007/s10694-024-01689-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to experimentally investigate the combustion products of fires suppressed/extinguished by two water-based fire suppression systems, namely, sprinklers and water mist systems. A total of thirteen experiments were conducted with various suppression system configurations, i.e., with a sprinkler, a low-pressure (LP) water mist, and a high-pressure (HP) water mist, at operating pressures ranging from 2 to 60 bar and water flow rate ranging from 10 to 206 L/min. Each experiment was conducted twice, except for the baseline experiment with no suppression. The fuel was a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pallet placed on two wood pallets. During all the stages of fire development, suppression with water, and post-suppression, the combustion products were sampled through Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) using a gas analyzer capable of operating in high humidity. The main combustion products identified were CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and H<sub>2</sub>O. In addition, NO<sub>x</sub> (nitrogen oxides), C<sub>x</sub>H<sub>y</sub> (light-weight hydrocarbons)<sub>,</sub> and HCN were present in relatively high concentrations. All the tested fire suppression systems were effective in reducing the fire size and cooling down the gases. However, when the fire could not be immediately extinguished, the NO<sub>x</sub>, C<sub>x</sub>H<sub>y</sub>, and HCN concentrations were higher than those in the baseline experiment. Moreover, it is observed that the HP water mist system was more effective than the sprinkler and low-pressure water mist systems in reducing the amount of combustion gases during suppression, resulting in lower Fractional Effective Doses (FED). It was observed that the combustion products returned to ambient conditions after five minutes of deactivation. The results from this study provide much-needed validation data for the effectiveness of water-based suppression systems, not only in reducing the fire size but also in reducing the production of acute toxic gases, which is important for considerations regarding evacuation, firefighting, and post-extinguishment conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"61 4","pages":"2441 - 2465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-024-01689-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-024-01689-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to experimentally investigate the combustion products of fires suppressed/extinguished by two water-based fire suppression systems, namely, sprinklers and water mist systems. A total of thirteen experiments were conducted with various suppression system configurations, i.e., with a sprinkler, a low-pressure (LP) water mist, and a high-pressure (HP) water mist, at operating pressures ranging from 2 to 60 bar and water flow rate ranging from 10 to 206 L/min. Each experiment was conducted twice, except for the baseline experiment with no suppression. The fuel was a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pallet placed on two wood pallets. During all the stages of fire development, suppression with water, and post-suppression, the combustion products were sampled through Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) using a gas analyzer capable of operating in high humidity. The main combustion products identified were CO2, CO, and H2O. In addition, NOx (nitrogen oxides), CxHy (light-weight hydrocarbons), and HCN were present in relatively high concentrations. All the tested fire suppression systems were effective in reducing the fire size and cooling down the gases. However, when the fire could not be immediately extinguished, the NOx, CxHy, and HCN concentrations were higher than those in the baseline experiment. Moreover, it is observed that the HP water mist system was more effective than the sprinkler and low-pressure water mist systems in reducing the amount of combustion gases during suppression, resulting in lower Fractional Effective Doses (FED). It was observed that the combustion products returned to ambient conditions after five minutes of deactivation. The results from this study provide much-needed validation data for the effectiveness of water-based suppression systems, not only in reducing the fire size but also in reducing the production of acute toxic gases, which is important for considerations regarding evacuation, firefighting, and post-extinguishment conditions.

水基灭火系统对燃烧产物的影响
本研究旨在实验研究两种水基灭火系统(洒水灭火系统和细水雾灭火系统)对火灾的灭火产物。在不同的灭火系统配置下,即喷头、低压(LP)水雾和高压(HP)水雾,在2 ~ 60 bar的工作压力和10 ~ 206 L/min的水流量范围内,共进行了13次实验。除基线实验不加抑制外,每个实验进行2次。燃料是一个高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)托盘放在两个木托盘上。在火灾发展、用水灭火和灭火后的所有阶段,使用能够在高湿条件下工作的气体分析仪,通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)对燃烧产物进行采样。主要燃烧产物为CO2、CO和H2O。此外,NOx(氮氧化物)、CxHy(轻烃)和HCN的浓度也相对较高。所有测试的灭火系统在减小火灾规模和冷却气体方面都是有效的。然而,当火灾不能立即扑灭时,NOx、CxHy和HCN浓度高于基线实验。此外,观察到高压细水雾系统比喷头和低压细水雾系统更有效地减少了抑制过程中的燃烧气体量,从而降低了分数有效剂量(FED)。据观察,燃烧产物在失活5分钟后恢复到环境条件。本研究的结果为水基灭火系统的有效性提供了急需的验证数据,不仅可以减少火灾规模,还可以减少急性有毒气体的产生,这对于考虑疏散、消防和灭火后的条件非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信