Dynamic Cone of Uncertainty Using Ensemble Forecasting of Tropical Cyclones

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Gauri Shanker, Abhijit Sarkar, Ashu Mamgain, R. Bhatla
{"title":"Dynamic Cone of Uncertainty Using Ensemble Forecasting of Tropical Cyclones","authors":"Gauri Shanker,&nbsp;Abhijit Sarkar,&nbsp;Ashu Mamgain,&nbsp;R. Bhatla","doi":"10.1007/s13143-025-00406-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many operational forecasting centres of tropical cyclones (TCs) issue a static Cone of Uncertainty (COU) to convey the uncertainty associated with the forecast track. This COU is based on the climatological distribution of forecast position errors. The uncertainty information from an ensemble prediction system can help in producing a dynamic COU. The objective of the present work is to build a dynamic COU using multiple member forecasts from India’s National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) Global Ensemble Prediction System (NEPS-G), where the radius at each forecast is determined such that it includes 67% of the ensemble members. This dynamic COU is then compared against a static COU constructed using the fixed radii prescribed by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which are derived from climatological forecast position errors of previous years. All TCs for the period 2019–2021 over the North Indian Ocean (NIO) have been considered in the present study. At shorter lead times (till 18 h), static probability circles are too small to capture most of the best tracks. The dynamic circles show higher detection rate than the static circles till at least 72 h forecast lead time. The static circles outperform the dynamic circles at longer lead times due to large errors in ensemble mean and inadequate ensemble spread. The dynamic circles, over both Bay of Bengal (BoB) and Arabian Sea (AS), perform better till 72-h lead time for the straight and recurving TCs. At longer lead times (84-h onwards), for BOB cyclones, static circles perform better but for AS cyclones, dynamic circles are slightly more effective. For storms with severe cyclonic and higher intensity, dynamic circles are more effective during 18 to 72-h forecasts. During the post-monsoon season for all lead times (except 120-h) best tracks lie within dynamic circles more often than static circles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-025-00406-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many operational forecasting centres of tropical cyclones (TCs) issue a static Cone of Uncertainty (COU) to convey the uncertainty associated with the forecast track. This COU is based on the climatological distribution of forecast position errors. The uncertainty information from an ensemble prediction system can help in producing a dynamic COU. The objective of the present work is to build a dynamic COU using multiple member forecasts from India’s National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) Global Ensemble Prediction System (NEPS-G), where the radius at each forecast is determined such that it includes 67% of the ensemble members. This dynamic COU is then compared against a static COU constructed using the fixed radii prescribed by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which are derived from climatological forecast position errors of previous years. All TCs for the period 2019–2021 over the North Indian Ocean (NIO) have been considered in the present study. At shorter lead times (till 18 h), static probability circles are too small to capture most of the best tracks. The dynamic circles show higher detection rate than the static circles till at least 72 h forecast lead time. The static circles outperform the dynamic circles at longer lead times due to large errors in ensemble mean and inadequate ensemble spread. The dynamic circles, over both Bay of Bengal (BoB) and Arabian Sea (AS), perform better till 72-h lead time for the straight and recurving TCs. At longer lead times (84-h onwards), for BOB cyclones, static circles perform better but for AS cyclones, dynamic circles are slightly more effective. For storms with severe cyclonic and higher intensity, dynamic circles are more effective during 18 to 72-h forecasts. During the post-monsoon season for all lead times (except 120-h) best tracks lie within dynamic circles more often than static circles.

利用热带气旋集合预报的动态不确定锥
许多热带气旋业务预报中心会发出静态不确定性锥(COU),以传达与预报路径有关的不确定性。该COU基于预报位置误差的气候分布。集合预报系统的不确定性信息有助于生成动态COU。当前工作的目标是利用来自印度国家中期天气预报中心(NCMRWF)全球集合预报系统(NEPS-G)的多个成员预报建立一个动态COU,其中每个预报的半径确定为包括67%的集合成员。然后将该动态COU与使用印度气象部门(IMD)规定的固定半径构建的静态COU进行比较,该固定半径来自往年的气候预报位置误差。本研究考虑了2019-2021年期间北印度洋(NIO)的所有tc。在较短的交货期(直到18小时),静态概率圈太小,无法捕获大多数最佳轨道。在预报提前72 h之前,动态圈的检出率高于静态圈。由于集合均值误差大,集合扩展不充分,静态圆在较长的交货期优于动态圆。孟加拉湾(BoB)和阿拉伯海(AS)上空的动态环流在72小时前表现较好。在较长的前置时间(84小时以后),对于BOB气旋,静态环流表现更好,但对于AS气旋,动态环流略显有效。对于强气旋和强度较高的风暴,动力圈在18至72小时的预报更有效。在季风过后的所有提前时间内(120小时除外),最好的路线往往位于动态圈内,而不是静态圈内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信