A generalized method for evaluating immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings from different perspectives

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Shuang Li, Binbin Hu, Changhai Zhai, Paloma Pineda
{"title":"A generalized method for evaluating immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings from different perspectives","authors":"Shuang Li,&nbsp;Binbin Hu,&nbsp;Changhai Zhai,&nbsp;Paloma Pineda","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02176-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The evaluation of immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings is crucial for advancing resilience-based seismic design. To facilitate the development of resilient buildings, a generalized method suitable for any occupancy type of building is proposed to evaluate immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings from engineering, economic, and social perspectives. A functional composition diagram of the building story is constructed, and the story functionality is quantified by using the hierarchical belief rule base inference method based on the evidential reasoning algorithm. The functional composition diagram incorporates the service status of utility systems, such as power, water, communication, heating, and drainage networks, to reflect their impact on the story functionality. Intra-story damage relevance and inter-story functionality relevance of the building are also considered in the functional loss evaluation. To evaluate direct economic loss, two methods for calculating the repair cost ratio are proposed. The choice of method hinges on the level of detail available. Direct social loss is quantified in terms of the casualty ratio, with considerations for the varying impacts of different casualty severity levels on society. Applying this generalized method to a teaching building, the results show that the functional loss is more severe compared to the direct economic and social losses. From the perspective of resilience-based seismic design, it is essential to focus on mitigating functional losses of buildings. This method can provide guidance for pre-earthquake strengthening efforts and post-earthquake recovery strategies for buildings and contribute to advancing resilience-based seismic design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 9","pages":"3711 - 3743"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02176-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings is crucial for advancing resilience-based seismic design. To facilitate the development of resilient buildings, a generalized method suitable for any occupancy type of building is proposed to evaluate immediate post-earthquake losses of buildings from engineering, economic, and social perspectives. A functional composition diagram of the building story is constructed, and the story functionality is quantified by using the hierarchical belief rule base inference method based on the evidential reasoning algorithm. The functional composition diagram incorporates the service status of utility systems, such as power, water, communication, heating, and drainage networks, to reflect their impact on the story functionality. Intra-story damage relevance and inter-story functionality relevance of the building are also considered in the functional loss evaluation. To evaluate direct economic loss, two methods for calculating the repair cost ratio are proposed. The choice of method hinges on the level of detail available. Direct social loss is quantified in terms of the casualty ratio, with considerations for the varying impacts of different casualty severity levels on society. Applying this generalized method to a teaching building, the results show that the functional loss is more severe compared to the direct economic and social losses. From the perspective of resilience-based seismic design, it is essential to focus on mitigating functional losses of buildings. This method can provide guidance for pre-earthquake strengthening efforts and post-earthquake recovery strategies for buildings and contribute to advancing resilience-based seismic design.

Abstract Image

一种从不同角度评估建筑物震后即时损失的广义方法
地震后建筑物的直接损失评估对于推进基于弹性的抗震设计至关重要。为了促进弹性建筑的发展,本文提出了一种适用于任何占用类型的建筑的通用方法,从工程、经济和社会的角度来评估建筑在地震后的直接损失。构造了建筑楼层的功能组成图,并采用基于证据推理算法的分层信念规则推理方法对楼层功能进行了量化。功能组合图结合了公用事业系统的服务状态,如电力、水、通信、供暖和排水网络,以反映它们对故事功能的影响。在功能损失评估中,还考虑了建筑物的层内损伤相关性和层间功能相关性。为了评估直接经济损失,提出了两种计算维修费用比的方法。方法的选择取决于可获得的细节程度。直接社会损失以伤亡率量化,并考虑到不同的伤亡严重程度对社会的不同影响。将该方法应用于某教学楼,结果表明,与直接的经济和社会损失相比,功能损失更为严重。从基于弹性的抗震设计的角度来看,重点是减轻建筑物的功能损失。该方法可以为建筑物的震前加固工作和震后恢复策略提供指导,并有助于推进基于弹性的抗震设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信